Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1023-08 School Concurrency
111111 IIIII II{II IIIII illll illfl 111111111111111111111II IIII 2008167962 Rcpt: 1214213 Rec: 970.50 DS: 0.00 IT: 0.0 ORDINANCE NO. 1023-68 11/21/08 Op y Clerk AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 740-00, ADOPTING �Q THE ZEPHYRHILLS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AS SUBSEQUENTLY AMENDED; REVISING THE TABLE OF CONTENTS TO INCLUDE m� CHAPTER 10; PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT; REVISING CHAPTER 1: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT TO DELETE SUMMARY l! ( OF SCHOOL SITING EDUCATION ISSUES, AND TO DELETE w� OBJECTIVE LU-1-8 AND THEIR RESPECTIVE POLICIES; REVISING ! 3 n CHAPTER 1: FUTURE LAND USE TEXT TO IDENTIFY WHICH LAND USE DESIGNATIONS WILL ALLOW SCHOOLS; CREATING A NEW CHAPTER 10: PUBLIC SCHOOL ! FACILITIES ELEMENT WITH I o ASSOCIATED GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES; REVISING CHAPTER 8: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT TO ADD A TEXT ADDITION ON PG. CIE-2 TO IDENTIFY SCHOOL DISTRICT FUNDING �A SOURCES; TO AMEND GOAL CI-1 AND POLICY CI-1-1-1; INCLUDE GOAL CI-4: PUBLIC SCHOOLS FACILITIES PROGRAM, OBJECTIVE CI-4-1 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLANNING, POLICY CI-4-1-1 SCHOOL BOARD'S FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT, POLICY CI-4-1-2 ADOPTED LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS FOR PASCO COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, POLICY CI-4-1-3 ANNUAL UPDATES, AND POLICY CI-4-1-4 FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE SCHOOL BOARD'S CAPITAL PROJECTS, INCLUDING EXHIBIT 17: PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES 5-10 YEAR CAPITAL PROJECTS AND INCLUDING EXHIBIT 18: FUNDING / REVENUE SOURCES FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS; REVISING CHAPTER SEVEN: INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT TO DELETE TEXT RELATING TO SCHOOL SITING CRITERIA AND OBJECTIVE ICE-1-5 JOINT PROCESS FOR SCHOOL SITING AND RELATED POLICIES: ICE-1-5-1, ICE-1-5-2, ICE-1-5-3, ICE-1-5-4, AND ICE-1-5-5, AMEND GOAL ICE-1 AND OBJECTIVE ICE 1-1, DELETE OBJECTIVE ICE-1-7 DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND RELATED POLICIES: ICE-1-5-1, ICE-1-5-2 AND ICE-1-5-3 REPLACED WITH NEW DISPUTE RESOLUTION UNDER POLICY ICE-1-5-1, INSERT GOAL ICE-2 TO MAINTAIN MECHANISMS FOR SCHOOL CONCURRENCY, CO- LOCATION OF FACILITIES AND JOINT PLANNING AND OBJECTIVE ICE-2-1 COORDINATION WITH DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD, AND POLICIES: ICE-2-1-1 CO-LOCATION OF SCHOOLS, PARKS AND LIBRARIES, ICE-2-1-2 JOINT PLANNING WITH SCHOOL BOARD, ICE-2-1-3 SCHOOL BOARD REVIEW AND COMMENT ON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS, ICE-2-1-4 COORDINATION OF SHARING INFORMATION WITH; SCHOOL BOARD, ICE-2-1-5 COORDINATION OF SCHOOL CONCURRENCY WITH SCHOOL BOARD AND ICE-2-1-6 COORDINATION OF FINANCIAL FEASIBLE CAPITAL PLANNING; REVISING THE MAP APPENDIX TO INCLUDE CHAPTER 10: PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT, MAP 10-1 EXISTING SCHOOLS AND ANCILLARY FACILITIES, MAP 10-2 PROPOSED SCHOOLS, ANCILLARY FACILITIES AND RENOVATIONS, MAP 10-3 COMMUNITY FOCAL POINT AND COLOCATION OPPORTUNITIES, MAP 10-4 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS, MAP 10-5 MIDDLE SCHOOL CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS, MAP 10-6 HIGH SCHOOL CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS AND MAP 10-7 EDUCATION CENTERS CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS; AND; PROVIDING FOR A REPEALER, SEVERABILITY,AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Chapters 125 and 163, Florida Statutes, authorize and require the City of ephyrhills to prepare and enforce a Comprehensive Plan for the development of the City; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Zephyrhills adopted a Comprehensive Plan on March 13, 2000,by Ordinance No. 740-00, and; Record and Return to: City Clerk's Office 5335 8th Street Zephyrhills, FL 33542 OR BK 7970 PG 755 2 of 114 WHEREAS, on April 23, 2008,the City Council of the City of Zephyrhills received a FDCA Objection, Recommendation, and Comment(ORC) (Report. DCA.NO. 08-PEFE1), dated Feb. 22, 2008) on the proposed amendment to the adopted Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Zephyrhills, as part of the said report was requested to consider adopting certain changes to the proposed amendment in order to have the FDCA find the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan in compliance; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Zephyrhills on August 25, 2008 held an adoption public hearing on the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan with due public notice provided pursuant to Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, and has considered all comments received during the public hearing and provided for necessary revisions. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Zephyrhills, Florida as follows: Section 1. AMENDMENT. The following amendments, as attached, are hereby adopted for the Comprehensive Plan: Revising the TABLE OF CONTENTS to include CHAPTER 10: PUBLIC SCHOOL. FACILITIES ELEMENT. Revising the LIST OF EXHIBITS to include EXHIBIT 17 - PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT; Revising Chapter 1: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT to amending language on Page LU-12 identifying which Future Land Use categories schools are permitted in; deleting School_ Siting text on Page LU-41; and to delete School Siting Objective LU-1-8, Policies LU-1-8-1, LU-1-8-2, LU-1-8-3, LU-1-8-4, LU-1-8-5 and LU-1-8-6; Revising Chapter 2: TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT to: amend language in the following policies to address the Proportionate Fair Share Ordinance adopted by the City: Policy TRA-1-1-1, Policy TRA-1-1-2, Policy TRA-1-1-3, Policy TRA-1-1-4,Policy TRA-1-1-6; Revising Chapter 7: INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT to: Amend Goal ICE-1, Objective ICE-1-1, Policy 1-5-1, Creating Goal ICE-2, Objective ICE-2-1, Policies ICE-2-1-1, ICE-2-1-2, ICE-2-1-3, ICE-2-1-4, ICE-2-1-5 and ICE-2-1-6; Revising Chapter 8: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT to: Amend the Table of Contents Page; Creating new text identifying school district funding sources on Page CIE-2; Amend Goal CIE-1, Policy CIE-1-1-1, Creating Goal CI-4, Objective CI-4-1, Policy CI-4-1-1, Policy CI-4-1-2, Policy CI-4-1-3 and Policy CI-4-1-4; Creating a new CHAPTER 10: PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT with associated Goals, Objectives and Policies; Creating a Map Appendix to include Chapter 10: PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT,Map8-1 EXISTING SCHOOLS AND ANCILLARY FACILITIES, MAPS-2 PROPOSED SCHOOL ANCILLARY FACILTIIES AND RENOVATIONS, MAPS-3 COMMUNITY FOCAL POINT AND COLOCATION OPPORTUNITIES, MAPS-4 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL-CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS,_ MAP8-5 MIDDLE SCHOOL CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS, MAP8-6 HIGH SCHOOL CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS AND MAPS-7 EDUCATION CENTERS CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS. SECTION 2. REPEALER. All provisions of the City of Zephyrhills Comprehensive Plan adopted pursuant to Ordinance No. 740-00, as subsequently amended, in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. OR BK 7970 PG 756 3 of 114 SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or provision of this ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction,then the said holding shall in no way affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance having contained such section, subsection, sentence, clause, or provision, and shall not be affected by such holding. SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed in the Office of the Secretary of State by he Clerk of the City of Zephyrhills within ten (10) days after the adoption of this ordinance. he effective date of this comprehensive plan amendment shall be twenty-one (21) days after th FDCA issues a Notice of Intend to find the amendment in compliance if no appeal is filed. No development orders, development permits, or land.uses dependent on this amendment may be issued or commence before it has become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued )y the Administration Commission,this amendment may nevertheless be made effective by doption of a resolution affirming its effective status; and a copy of such resolutions shall be ser t o the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Local Planning, 2555 Shumard Oal oulevard, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100. t r { The foregomg brdinan�e No. 1023-08 was read and passed on the first reading in an open an egu ar meeting of th66.@1ty Council of the City of Zephyrhills, Florida, on this 25th day of August, 2008. N`ts r.-row t; 4n D. oai `E ity Clerk Luis M. Lopez, Co cil President The foregoing Ordiriarjce No. 1023-08 was read and passed on the second reading, following public hearin iman;.open and regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Zephyrhills, Florida poi t1us 8 ''ddy of September, 2008. L1 aD.^Boan, City Clerk Luis M. Lopez, o cil President he,foregoin �� dgn�ance No. 1023-08 was approved by me this 8th day of September, 2008. W. Cliff u , May Approved as to 1 al form and legal content Joseph A. Poblick; City Attorney OR BK 7970 pc 757 4 of 114 COMPREHENSIVE'PLAN-2010 CITY OF ZEPHYRHILLS, FLORIDA TABLE OF CONTENTS ,Chapter 1. Future Land Use Element 2. Transportation Element 3. Housing Element 4. Public Facilities Element 5. Conservation Element 6. Recreation and Open Space Element 7. Intergovernmental Coordination Element 8. Capital Improvements Element 9. Economic Development Element � I 10. Public School Facilities Element Appendices 1 1 OR BK 7970 PG 758 "I 5 of 114 Future Land Use Map Categories Table LU-5 establishes the FLUM categories, the maximum densities and intensities, the locational and use characteristics of each category, and additional standards and criteria necessary to assist in managing the development of land in Zephyrhills. The purpose of this table is to aid decision-makers and the general public in understanding what the appropriate uses are in each category, where they should be located, and how intensively a parcel can be developed. The FLUM categories include: • Residential Estate • Industrial • Residential Suburban • Recreation and Open Space • Residential Urban • Public/Semi-Public • Mobile Home/Recreational Vehicle • :Conservation/Wetlands • Mixed Use • Agriculture Schools shall be permitted in all Future Land Use categories except: C/W (Conservation/ Wetlands) and IN (Industrial). In the planning, siting,' land acquisition and development of the facility evaluation shall include consideration of the following: 1. The student population density of the area, such as sufficient student population of the existing rural communities; 2. Require where feasible the location of new elementary and middle schools, internal or adiacent to residential neighborhoods; and 3. Public safety. Re ision: August, 2008 CITY OF ZEPHYRHILLS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LU-12 OR BK 7970 PG 759 iI 6 of 114 TABLE LU-15 .ij PROPOSED ZEPHYRHILLS PLANNING AREA BOUNDARIES CITY OF ZEPHYRHILLS North: Kossik Road South: Chancey Road/Zephyrhills Bypass East: Zephyrhills Bypass West: Dean Dai Road Floodplain Management The highest floodwaters recorded in Zephyrhills resulted from Hurricane Donna in 1960. At that time, water in the vicinity of Lake Zephyr rose to a level of approximately 82 feet above mean sea level(MSL). This experience is the basis for establishing a base flood elevation of 83 feet above MSL for the Lake Zephyr area. This is the only area in Zephyrhills designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as an A zone on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Th City has adopted flood damage prevention regulations that apply to the any proposed development within the officially designated flood hazard area. Pasco County and SWFWMD hate jointly funded a study of the Upper Lake Zephyr Drainage Area intended to identify means of alleviating recurring flooding problems within this area, almost all of which is outside the corporate limits. One by-product of the study is base flood elevations based on hydrological modeling. Pasco County requested a FIRM map revision from FEMA. The City of Zephyrhills does not apply adopted flood damage prevention regulations to the redefined flood hazard area. Si ce current development requires a permit from SWFWMD, the City has routinely required the issl.lance of a SWFWMD permit as a precondition! to issuance of a building permit for new development. The only flooding problem experienced in the flood;prone area in recent years.resulted in the removal of three mobile homes from sites within a mobile home park. The park owner has been unable to secure the necessary SWFWMD permit to fallow further filling of flooded sites. In 1998, the City began participating on the Pasco County Local Mitigation Strategy Committee. The committee has developed a priority list of countywide projects and strategies for reducing darnage as a result of hazardous events. Since being active on this committee, the City has received an Emergency Management Trust Fund grant to assist in developing a citywide master sto�mwater management plan.. This plan is envisioned to identify and correct flood-related problems in Zephyrhills. Scf700!Siting Or December } n C ty n I Board stated that there areno plans in the irnOr -1997, the Pasco County School vgaFr] � Inediate future to construct phd/or expand Zephyrhills High School (ZHS). Currently, .disrict extends west to Interstate 75. In the fall of 1999, a new high school will open in the WslOy Chapel area. The opening of this school willl reduce the number of students at ZHS and allow future growth. Also, there are also no plans tO construct any additional middle schools in th City. The PCSB has indicated that Stuart Middle School is being evaluated for potential futiire expansion. However, there are no immediate plans for any expansion. There are prsentIy no plans for additional construction the ZHS expansion at either of the o existing elementary schools. Chester W. Taylor, Jr. ElementLry was completed in 1997 and is located a nog role of miles to the west of the city limits CITY OF ZEPHYRHILLS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LU-41 u , OR BK 7970 PG 760 ii 7 of 114 POLICY The clearing of trees and wetland vegetation shall, be prohibited unless permits LU-1-7-4: are received from appropriate governmental entities. POLICY The developer/owner of any new development or redevelopment shall be LtJ-1=7-5: responsible for on-site management of storm water run-off in a manner so that post-development run-off rates, volumes and pollutant loads do not exceed existing conditions. • SCHOOL SITING OBJECTIVE Effective with the adoption of this Plan the City shall support e faits that LU 1 8: facilitate coordination of planning between the City and the School Board for the• location and development of erdt the+ional facilities pursuant to requirements f t • Section 163.3177, Florida Statutes. P9LICy I r Publiö educational facilities are an allowable use within the following future land categories: Residential t, Sl uburban; Residential Urban, Mixed Use, Mobile Home/Recreational Vehicle; d i public. POLICY The City will coordinate and ooeperate with the School Beard to ensure that qqLU1 8 2: schools are adequately and efficiently provided commensurate with groh and address school planning issues thuch as: site selection and construction! ems- POLICY In addition to consistency with the comprehensive.Plan, l Ill 1 3: of a new or expanded public education facility shall be reviewed and considered relative to the following criteria: a. promotes joint infrastructure for park / and school facilities; b. adequacy/availability of ttty- existing or planned infrastructure; +ro+t tre• t it G. proposed location can-accommodate-the facility's transportationneeds hicle queuing, parking, and sidewalks); • e:�'�v-e� mt t • d. compatibility with present and projected uses of adjacent property; e. direct accessibility to an existing or+planned road..ay classified as a minor collector or higher for-elementary and middle school and a major. collector or higher for high schools. f. Suitability of soil for structures and outdoor educational facilities; g. facility size,--location, and integration into the neighborhood (,., t nonvehicular access) enables students to walk or bicycle to school; and # . location is outside the arearegulated by Section 333.03(3), IS, regarding the construction of public educational facilities in the vicinity of an airport.. POLICY A Comprehensive Plan corisis eny determination-shall be conducted for I d d 1 8 4: proposed educational facility sites, and the City may—impose--retie amble • conditions of development as related to Policy LU 1 8 3. Conditions may not be • imposed-that-conflict With--Chapter 235 FS, or tate Uniform Building Code, unless mutually agreed I� CITY OF ZEPHYRHILLS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LU-48 0R BK 7970 PG 761 jl 8 of 114 POLICY Before a significant change of a program at a public educational facility is II l l 1 8 5: implemented the School Beard anda the City shall—require a review of the • facilities-e+ site and offsite impacts. T� School Board and the City shall work . cooperatively to mitigate onsite an offsite including impacts to public fail impacts, The supporting ,nn policies under , I I I 1 re s ,med to be consistent F�1=1�1� F�.�e�RQ �726t#�fev-r� are assumed ccni I_1_Q_R• with, and do not nullify or conflict with, the provisions of Chapter 235, FS. NEIGHBORHOOD INTEGRITY AND AESTHETIC j. OBJECTIVE Improve.and enhance the visual appearance of neighborhoods and commercial Lli-9: areas in the City. POLICY The land development regulations shall provide for reduction of confusion and L1i-9-1: visual clutter through control of size,'placement, and related aspects of signage. POLICY In order to ensure compatibility with residential areas, the City shall require new L1J-9-2: nonresidential development or redevelopment in the. Residential land use categories to obtain a.rezoning under a site plan controlled zoning district. Said district would consider the following, at a minimum: intended use, intensities of adjacent land uses, buffering, building layout, building orientation, architecture, parking, pedestrian and vehicular circulation, drainage, and safety. I . . i1 1 : .I I I i i 44 CITY OF ZEPHYRHILLS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LU-49 OR BK ?9?0 PG 762 9 of 114 GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES Introduction P irsuant 'to Sections 163.3177(6)(a), FS, and 1 Section 9J-5.006(3), FAC, the following represents the Land Use Goals, Objectives and Policies of the City of Zephyrhills. In addition to statutory requirements, the following Goals, Objectives and Policies were developed in keeping. with the -character, conditions, both environmental)and social, and desires of the community. These Goals, Objectives and Policies are intended.to address the establishment of the long- term end towards which the land use programs and activities are ultimately directed. Implementation Unless otherwise stated, the implementation of objectives and policies shall be developed, adopted, and application of regulations set forth in the City Code of Ordinances and Land Development Code. SURFACE TRANSPORTATION GOAL To establish and maintain a safe, convenient and efficient multi-modal TRA-1: transportation system that serves to increase mobility and reduce reliance upon the automobile. L veI of Service j OBJECTIVE The City shall continue to provide safe, efficient and quality roadways in the City TRA-1-1: ' of Zephyrhills that maintain transportation efficiency. POLICY The City shall continue to maintain the following roadway operational level of IRA-1-1-1: service (LOS) standards, as defined in Table TRA-2, using professionally accepted methodologies. City service volume standards will be determined as follows: . a. Collector roadways- LOS "D", peak hour b. Arterial roadways— LOS "D peak hour. POLICY All development orders/permits shall be issued only when it is documented that TRA-1-1-2: such development is consistent with adopted level of service standards in the Comprehensive Plan. New concurrency requirements will allow issuance of a development order/permit if the facilities/services are scheduled to be in place or under construction not more than three years after issuance of certificate of occupancy as provided in the Capital Improvements Element. Transportation facilities needed to serve new development shall be in place or under actual construction within three years after the local government approves a building permit or its functional equivalent that results in traffic generation. H . , H . . . ' CITY OF ZEPHYRHILLS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page TRA-j17 OR BK 7970 Pc 763 10 of 114 POLICY The City shall continue to pursue opportunities to improve traffic flow on US 301 TRA-1-1-3: as the highest priority for local transportation through coordination with local, regional, and state plans. Other transportation priorities are the extension of' 20th Street to the East Bypass and the South Avenue/Sixth Street extension to the East Bypass. ,Other improvements include the extension of Greenslope Drive, the improvement of Simons'Road and the extension of the one-way pair to the south. POLICY The City shall assess new development or redevelopment an equitable pro rata TRA-1-1-4: share of the costs to provide roadway and/or intersection improvements necessary to serve new construction: Pro .rata share cost will be determined based upon procedures set fourth in i Ordinance 973-07 or the currently adopted proportionate fair share ordinance at!the time of assessment. POLICY Establish with the assistance of the, Pasco County MPO, numerical indicators T -1-1-5: on modal split, transit trips per capita, automobile occupancy rates, and the like to help measure progress towards improved transportation system efficiency. POLICY Except in cases where the impacts of the proposed development are T ' -1-1-6 demonstrated to be de minimis as that term is defined in Section 163.3180 of the Florida Statutes, all projects requesting development approval shall conduct a transportation study to determine if the transportation impacts along significantly impacted roadway segments of the development will l cause any roadway within the City.,to fall-bel^he-adopted level of service: In cases where projects within the City acces's State or County public roadway facilities, transportation studies will be required to conform with State or County jurisdictional access requirements. Projects that will have only a de ininimis impact shall 'be exempt from the transportation'portion of the required i concurrency review. If a proposed development does not qualify as de minimis, and the applicant development is projected to generate morethan 55%% of the-level-of service "D" capacity during the PM peak hour, a any project entrance, the applicant will be required to conduct a detailed traffic i study in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 4210, Zephyrhills Land Development Code. . In the event the significantly impacted roadway segments in the traffic study are anticipated to analysis chows that an impacted roadway will operate below the adopted level of service at project buildout, no development permit shall be issued unless the criteria set forth in Section 9J-5.0055(3), FAC has been satisfied.' . POLICY The City shall consider the following performance standards for purposes of T -1-1-7: transportation planning: a. Sidewalks—2 miles for every 1 mile of new roadway; b. .bicycle lanes/paths— 1 mile for every 1 mile of new roadway; c. sidewalks connecting schools,;parks, shopping areas, and major medical facilities. CITY OF ZEPHYRHILLS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN' . Page TRA-18 OR BK 7970 PG 764 it of 114 PL ICY The City shall establish a level of service standard for pedestrian circulation to TRA-1-1-8: provide Right-of-Way Protection O�JECTIVE By December 2000, the City wills amend the Land Development Code to T -1-2: establish procedures for identification, protection from encroachment, or acquisition of roadway right-of-way. POLICY By December 2000, the City shall develop a map that identifies all existing and, TRA-1-2-1: if deemed appropriate to the development pattern of the community, future road rights-of-way. POLICY The City will enforce all minimum setback requirements from, all future rights-of- TRA-1-2-2: way. P LICY The City will continue to utilize all legitimate. regulatory authority, including TRA-1-2-3: mandatory dedications.and fees in I lieu of, as a condition of plat approval to identify, reserve, and acquire sufficient right-of-way for future development and -expansion of collector and arterial roadways identified in Map TRA-2. POLICY Use of existing or future rights-of-way for public or private utilities shall be T -1-2-4: permitted in accordance with applicable regulations. M Itimodal Transportation System i OBJECTIVE By December 2000, the City shall, through revisions to the Land Development • T -1-3: Code, establish criteria and-procedures to ensure the maintenance of a safe, convenient, and energy efficient multimodal transportation system. POLICY The City shall support'and encourage through site plan review alternative T ( -1-3-1: modes of transportation/transit friendly design' features along roadways to accommodate the needs of pedestrians, cyclists, and handicapped persons, and promote ridesharing by public avid private sector employees. POLICY By December 2000, . the City shall begin construction of streetscape T -1-3-2: improvements in the Downtown area that address pedestrian and vehicular • circulation. i POLICY . , As an on-going policy, the City's traffic circulation system shall emphasize TRA-1-3-3: pedestrian safety and transit-friendly design . PO ICY The City Police Department shall-continue-to maintain accident frequency data TRA-1-3=4: and annually review problem areas and potential solutions. PO ICY The City's site plan review process ;shall address driveway connection/access TRA-1-3-5: points for new development or redevelopment, activities to ensure minimal adverse impact to traffic flow or safety on adjacent roadways. CITY OF ZEPHYRHILLS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page TRA-19 ii OR BK 7970 PG 765 12 of 114 POLICY In conjunction with the Pasco County MPO and FDOT, the City shall participate. TRA-1-3-6: in transportation demand. management (TDM) measures such as alternate transportation modes (i.e., bicycle;, pedestrian, transit), telecommuting, and ridesharing, etc. to reduce peak hour travel demand on US 301 and SR 54. POLICY With assistance of Pasco County arid, FDOT, the City will address the following TRA-1-3-7: issues: improve intersection capacities, optimize traffic signalization, and improve signage to increase transportation efficiency and safety. POLICY The City shall establish, through its capital improvement budget, an annual TRA-1-3-8: roadway maintenance and improvement program, sidewalk construction II program, and a plan to improve existing unpaved City streets. POLICY The City shall coordinate with responsible entities to maintain adequate TRA-1-3-9: pedestrian crossing times along US 301 and SR 54 for the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists. Public Transit.System OBJECTIVE Continue to participate on the Pasco County MPO to ensure that County T -1-4: operated public transportation efficiently serves existing and proposed major trip generators and attractors, land uses, and the transportation disadvantaged in Zephyrhills. II POLICY The City will continue to facilitate the efforts of the Pasco County MPO and TRA-1-4-1: FDOT to provide convenient and efficient public transportation. POLICY The City will coordinate with Pasco County Public Transit (PCPT) to provide TRIA-1-4-2: additional bus stops. POLICY The City will attempt to continue construction of bicycle/pedestrian paths that TRA-1-4-3: provide connections to transit routes in the City. POLICY By December 2000, the City shall develop parking strategies that promote TRA-1-4-4: transportation objectives. Strategies could include: a. maximum, in lieu of minimum parking requirements; b. elimination of parking requirements in Downtown or for proposed traditionally designed developments; c. park and ride lots; d. on-street parking as a traffic calming technique; e. location of parking lots behind buildings. POLICY The City shall encourage compact, mixed use, nodal development' in T -1-4-5: designated public transportation corridors to promote convenient and efficient use of public transportation. PO ICY The City shall coordinate with the Pasco County MPO and PCPT to provide bus TRA-1-4-6: service to areas of the City which demonstrate a need for service, especially, assisted living facilities (ALFs) and other retirement facilities, with focus on providing basic transportation needs to those who have no private means of ii CITY OF ZEPHYRHILLS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page TRA-20 jl I I. OR BK 7970 PG 766 • 13 of 114 transportation. P 8 LICY The City shall attempt to increaser public awareness regarding PCPT transit T -1-4-7: schedules, services, and route information. P LICY The City shall incorporate bikeways'in the design of roadway improvements and T -1-4-8: mark designated bicycle routes which will provide citizens access to shopping, employment, education,and recreational centers. POLICY The City shall maintain development regulations and design standards for on- T 1-4-9: site motorized and nonmotorized parking; safe and convenient on-site vehicle circulation systems; ad access points through the development review process to ensure adequate vehicular, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian site access and to discourage use of single-occupant vehicles. P LICY The City shall implement development regulations and design standards,that T 1-4-10: require. pedestrian and bicycle facilities within residential and nonresidential developments. Fu ure Land Use i O JECTIVE The planning of traffic circulation shall continue to be coordinated with the City's :T FA-1-5: Future Land Use Plan to consider!existing and projected population density, housing and employment patterns, and land use trends. POLICY The City will continue to consider and coordinate traffic circulation planning TRiA-1-5-1: issues locally and with the Pasco County MPO. Proposed development will be reviewed in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Plan Elements and current/future employment and growth trends. Co nmUnity Design and Aesthetics OBJECTIVE Evaluate all transportation projects for aesthetic benefits., T -1-6: POLICY Roadway improvements that incorporate medians or parkways in their design T -1-6-1: shall landscape these features to enhance the roadway's aesthetic. POLICY • The Land Development Code shall require parking lots to be functionally T -1-6-2: landscaped to provide maximum shading, beauty, and stormwater drainage. Al TRANSPORTATION• GOAL • Development of the Zephyrhills Municipal Airport as a significant source of T -2: • revenue for the City of Zephyrhills tax base, and to insure self sufficiency of the airport. j ;I • Economic Development CITY OF ZEPHYRHILLS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page TRA-21 lk OR BK 7970 PG 767 I 14 of 114 OBJECTIVE Recruit and-locate new businesses] each year to lease property at the Airport TRA-2-1: and Industrial Park. POLICY The City will provide adequate water, sewer and road access to all lessees at T -2-1-1: the Airport. Ai port Layout Plan OBJECTIVE Coordinate all future development and expansion .with the Airport Layout Plan, TRA-2-2: Future Land Use, Conservation and Transportation Elements. 'POLICY The City will review all future Airport development and expansion in compliance T -2-2-1: with the Comprehensive Plan and the Airport Layout Plan. POLICY Ensure that all access routes to the Airport are properly integrated with other TRA-2-2-2: modes of transportation. POLICY . Lands adjacent to the CSX Railroad will be- reserved for prospective tenants. T -2-2=3: requiring rail access. P LICY Ensure protection and conservation of natural resources located on airport -TR�A-2-2-4: property. P LICY Review proposed development abutting Airport property to ensure compatibility TRA-2-2-5: with Airport. OBJECTIVE By 2000, develop potential airport expansion opportunities. TRA-2-3: POLICY Develop strategies to acquire or protect property for purposes of clear.zones to T -2-3-1: the north of runways 1-8 and 3-6 for future runway expansion to 7,500 feet. G AL Minimize conflict between development of the Zephyrhills Airport and adjacent • T -3: land uses and natural resources. Land Use Compatibility OBJECTIVE . Improve the existing.interlocal agreement with Pasco County to assure land use T -3-1: compatibility. POLICY Develop strategies to ensure protection of airport from the encroachment of T 3-1-1: incompatible uses. POLICY Protect all existing and, projected airspace surfaces and runway protection • T 3-1-2: zones around the airport to ensure safe airport.operations. Intergovernmental Coordination CITY OF ZEPHYRHILLS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page TRA-22 f OR BK 7970 PG 766 15 of 114 OBJECTIVE Coordinate all aviation plans with the Pasco County MPO, FDOT, USACOE, TRA-3-2: and FAA, as required. P LICY All airport property development will be reviewed by the City and coordinated T -3-2-1: with all appropriate governmental entities. i II k � CITY OF ZEPHYRHILLS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page TRA-23 OR BK 7, 970 PG 769 16 of 114 S Department of the Interior....................... ......i .................................ICE-14 US Department of Education........................................................................... .......ICE-15 JS DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ... ........ .. ........ICE-15 C O ORDINATION WITH UTILITY COMPANIES......i..........................................................ICE-15 lorida Power Corporation...............................................................................................ICE-15 eneral Telephone Company of Florida...............I.................................................I..........ICE-16 lorida Satellite Network Cablevision....................1.. ..ICE-16 ...................................................... AMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY(TECO)GAS..............:...............................:..........................ICE-.16 ANALYSIS ............................................................ ...................... ....................ICE-17 ffectiveness of Existing Coordination Mechanisms..............................:........................ICE-17' Existing Contracts and Agreements ..............................................................................ICE-17 Coordination with Local Governments and Countywide Entities..................................ICE-17 Coordination with Federal, State, and Regional Agencies............................................ICE-18 Coordination with Utilities .......ICE-18 ntergovernmental Coordination and Plan Elements........................................................ICE-18 Future Land Use Element.............................................................................................ICE-18 Transportation Element..:............................................,...........................................::..ICE-19 Infrastructure Element........................ .....ICE-19 Recreation and Open Space Element.........................................................................ICE-19 Capital Improvements Element....................................................................................ICE-20 Economic Element .....ICE-20 VALUATION AND APPRAISAL PROCES$...................I........................:................................ICE-20 C NSIDERATION OF OTHER'S PLANS -CAMPUS MASTER PLANS AND SPECIAL II DISTRICTS..........................................................................................................................ICE-21 Lampus Master Plans ICE-21. SpecialDistricts..............................................................................................................ICE-21 Dependent Special Districts ........................................................................................ICE-21 Independent Special Districts.............................................................. ..........ICE-22 Required Special District Coordination..............i.........................................................................ICE-22 IDENTIFICATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF JOINT PLANNING AREAS...................ICE-23 Annexation and Service Areas.................... ..ICE-23 ................................................................... Existing Coordination Mechanisms...............................................................................ICE-23 Analysis.and Effectiveness..........................................................................................ICE-23 J INT PROCESSES FOR COLLABORATIVE PLANNING AND DECISION MAKING....ICE-23 opulation Projections..........................................i..........................................................ICE-24 rhroo6i ttR --.........:...........:......................................_....................................:..............ICE-24 cilities Subject to Concurrency................... .................................................................ICE-24 cilities with Countywide Significance.................!...........................................................ICE-25 PROBLEMATIC LAND USES...................................,......,......................................................ICE-26 V LUNTARY DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESSES...:.................................................ICE-26 AMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL ..............................I............................ICE-26 G� ALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES ................1 .� !.............................................:............ICE-27 ntroduction......................................................................................................................ICE-27 MPLEMENTATION .ICE-27 CITY OF ZEPHYRHILLS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ICE-iii I� OR BK 7970 PG 770 17 of 114 Population Projections i The City relies on population projections provided by the state. Existing Coordination Mechanisms: Contact — Katherine Burbridge, Pasco County Growth M' nagement Division. A�alysis of Effectiveness: These coordination mechanisms have been effective in coordinating the SLhool Siting 1995 Legislature nacted Chapter 95311, La+s of Florida, which rnade dramatic changes c€ating to how schools were to be coordinated with local government comprehensive I . plans.the siting of public schools.. Even though many locl governments met the original deadline, the 198 Legislature passed Senate Bill 2474 (Chapter107 176, Laws of Florida) which changed this dadline to October 1999, and added requirements for the collocation of public facilities such k4'j requirement was that by October 1, 1996, each local government was to include criteria for libraries,,parks, and community centers. V\ith adoption of this comprehensive plan, theCity of ZephyrhiU . will hve necessary cmprehensive plan policiee in place to be compliat with the School Siting Act. The City's next stps will be to amend the Land Development Codb to be consistent with thece policies and to erter into an interlocal agreement with the Paso County School Board outlining specific rdination mechanisms. Existing Coordination Mechanisms: There are currently no formal coordination mechanisms in place; however, policies toward this end have been!added to this Comprehensive Plan. • Analysis of Effectiveness: Not applicable as there are currently no formal coordination m chanisms in place.. Facilities Subiect to Concurrency Facilities subject to concurrency include: .. Potable water • Stormwater drainage • Sanitary sewer • Transportation o Solid waste • Parks and recreation. TI e City has relationships with other agencies to provide these facilities and services. Separate fr m facility location and construction, however, is the need for coordination of local government •concurrency methodologies and systems, and levels of service with other units of local •government providing services, but not having the regulatory authority over the use of land (i.e., F D OT for state roads). • Pcltable Water: An interlocal agreement between the City and Pasco County provides for City re iew of any development proposal which may impact the potable water levels of service. Sanitary Sewer: An interlocal agreement between the City and Pasco County provides for City re iew of any development proposal which may impact the sanitary sewer levels of service. CITY OF ZEPHYRHILLS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ICE-24 1 OR BK 7970 PG 771 18 of 114 Review of Intergovernmental Coordination Goals, Objective and Policies GOAL ICE 1: IMPROVE INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION TO SUCCESSFULLY IMPLEMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLANS AND TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS RESULTING FROM THE PLANS. TO ALIGN THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT SECTION WITH RECENT CHANGES IN STATE- LAW PERTAINING TO SCHOOL FACILITIES, OBJECTIVE 1.1 i AND POLICY 1.1.2 HAVE BEEN UPDATED TO EXPLICITLY INCLUDE THE REQUIREMENT OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION FOR SCHOOL CONCURRENCY. Objective ICE 1.1: Review each element of the comprehensive plan and development proposals to: a. Identify and coordinate items that are of mutual interest to others; b. Identify issues that should be coordinated with others; c. Address through coordination mechanisms the impacts of development on others; • d. Others shall include the Pasco County School Board, other units of local government providing services but not having regulatory authority over the use of land,. adjacent local governments, regional, state or federal agencies and the District School Board of Pasco County. Policy ICE 1.5.1: In instances where the. resolution of issues requiring intergovernmental concurrence has not been achieved, the City of Zephyrhills shall seek relief through Chapter 164, Florida Statutes, unless otherwise provided herein. All disputes between the City and the School board pertaining to school concurrence shall be resolved in accordance with the Interlocal Agreement as approved by the City on June 23, 2008. Goal ICE.2 TO MAINTAIN MECHANISMS FOR SCHOOL CONCURRENCY , CO-LOCATION OF FACILITIES,AND JOINT PLANNING Objective ICE 2.1 District School Board of Pasco County Maintain mechanisms for intergovernmental coordination and cooperation and implement school concurrence management between the City of Zephyrhills and the District School Board of Pasco County. . Policy ICE 2.1.1 Co-Location of Schools,Parks and Libraries. The City shall coordinate with the School Board in the development of an Interlocal Agreement to implement the criteria and guidelines developed in the Study for the Co-Location of Schools, Parks and Libraries in Pasco County. Policy ICE 2.1.2 Joint Planning with the School Board of Pasco County. 1 OR BK 7970 PG 772 19 of 114 The City shall implement the Interlocal Agreement approved on June 23, 2008 for Coordination of Planning Activities to include a School Concurrency Management Program among Pasco County, the municipalities and the District School Board of Pasco County. Policy ICE 2.1.3 School Board Review and Comment . on Development Applications. The City shall continue to request review.and comment by_the District School Board on all proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments,)applications for residential rezoning and other development applications, which proposed to increase residential densities, per the process agreed to in the Interlocal Agreement approved on June 23, 2008. Policy ICE 2.1.4 Coordination of Sharing Information with the School Board. { The City in conjunction with the District School Board and consistent with the . requirements of the Interlocal Agreement (approved on June 23, 2008) for coordination of Planning Activities shall provide information to the School Board regarding population growth and development and receive from the School Board information on • student enrollment, annual updates to the District Facilities Work Program, and other such information as proposed school closures, significant renovations, new school sites, • concurrency, service area modifications, and! comments on the effect of proposed development applications on schools. Policy ICE 2.1.5 Coordination of School Concurrence with the School Board. The City in conjunction with the district School -Board and consistent with the requirements of the Interlocal Agreement approved on June 23, 2008) for coordination for Planning Activities, and the Public School Facilities Element, shall implement • uniform school concurrence procedures. • Policy ICE 2.1.6 . Coordination of Financially Feasible Capital Planning. On an annual basis the City's Capital Improvement Element shall be amended- to • incorporate the most recent updates to the School Board's capital improvements schedule of the District Facilities Work Program. 2 OR BK 7970 PG 773 20 of 114 CHAPTER 8 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE CAPOTAL IMPROVEMENTS DATA REQUIREMENTS PUBLIC FACILITY NEEDS FUNDING SOURCES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ANALYSIS PROGRAMMING CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Goals,,Objective, and Policies Goal CI-4: Public Schools Capital Facilities Program CI 4.1 Capital Facilities Planning Exhibits Exhibit A Public School Facilities Five-Year Capital Projects . I • OR 3K 7970 0 pG 774 21 of 114 ;Capitaimprvement Element a TexAddition �Pg,sCIE 2)'. School'D�strrc#,FuninaS:o ru ces ThSchool District e1ies on local.and=state fii�ntlirig to address the nevW cons#ruction antl reno� #ion needs._of the:Schools D.stf ct's Five,Year,_Capital.°Facilities Plan,.Thewsprimary local,fiundiri z.. � ter._ g-vsourcesareahe Pennyfor_Pascoa properky'taxesr impac#..fees and bonds.. By Ftoritla.Statute school ditrits rxiati lew up,to 2 m�llsf w�thou#fan�election£.to_hQlo fund the distnct.cap�talprograi ,The Schoot. zlmpactr.Fee.: Ordinance :establ shetl =uniform imnac# fees throuahout the •County andprocedures for-..the imposition; aIculaton collection .administration •and expenehture ofitithose..imgact.,fees.. Ir;.adtlatio`n:,the.Ordinance facilita#eland-assures tfiat new.. esidentials constructionY:contributes its?fa�c. share:'.,towards"the ..costs .of school facilitie ,' • Recurs ng.Gp�tal� undrrig 5ources The 5taie�'of�FFlorida;helpsynfurd.�cao.�talneetlsof_,local�school�'distnctsthrough two recurring,.fund.firpes....P.ublic.Education`=:GaAitaL Outlay(PECO) and Capital Outlay&=Debt Service,(CO DS), PECO;`funding.,norrnally. s.the larger:=of thee`two and isudeived 1rorn Statezgross reeiptsY.tazes on::utilities DS funds.aregeneratetl_=by vehicle tags'taxes Funds core -distributedf among=local scli'bbl districts to be used acco dina to a specified formula:;• Non.Recurrrnp Fu____• ources • U Non-recurr�na funtlna sources include the .Florida:Department ofi:Education-Classroom` fior_Kids�and �elatetl :clas's :s�zeretluc#ron fundirig andf.Special Facihfies -Construction • grants.::.The Classroom for Kids Program provides capital funds .to help local school •• districts• impleinentaheFl`onda;constitutionalamentlment aandating.class size reduction This proramz,does not expand school capaeitu abut rather only preadsexistina` enrollm--ents°::over a#ddttional classrooM92• Capital Improvements: Goals, Objective and Policies GOAL CI . 1: THE CITY . SHALL UNDERTAKE FISCAL ACTIONS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN PUBLIC FACILITIES FOR ALL PERMANENT AND SEASONALRESIDENTS AT THE ADOPTED LEVELS OF SERVICE STANDARDS. • TO ALIGN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT SECTION WITH _ RECENT CHANGES IN. STATE LAW PERTAINING TO SCHOOL FACILITIES, OBJECTIVE 1.1 AND POLICY 1.1.1 HAVE BEEN UPDATED TO • EXPLICITLY INCLUDE THE. REQUIREMENT OF MULTI-YEAR FISCAL MANAGEMENT. 1 OR BK 7970 PG 775 22 of 114 Objective Cfi 1.1: As an ongoing objective,'capital improvements will be provided in a fiscally sound manner to correct existing deficiencies, to accommodate desired future. development and redevelopment, and to replace worn-out' or obsolete facilities, as indicated in the Five Year Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). Policy CI L1.1: The City shall annually evaluate and rank, in order of priority projects for inclusion in the CIP based upon the capital needs derived from other elements of this comprehensive plan. The assigned relative priority will be designated on the CIP for each legislatively restricted funding 'source as, well as the City's General Fund. . Financial feasibility is annually demonstrated by calculating the amount of revenue capacity of those sources which can be generated by action of the City Council (excluding resort to voter approved revenue sources). The projected revenue is then matched, against the proposed five-year capital improvements schedule to identify whether a deficit exists. This same process is required to be used by the District School Board'of Pasco County to verify the financial feasibility of its Five-Year Capital.Plan prior to its incorporation into the City's Schedule of Capital Improvements and relied upon by the Cite GOAL CI-4: -PUBLIC SCHOOLS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM � I Objective CI 4.1.Capital Facilities Planning To the extent required by law, the City shall ensure that existing deficiencies and future needs are addressed consistent with the adopted Levels of Service standards for public schools. Policy CI 4.1.1 School Board's' Financially Feasible Capital Improvement Program. ' ' . . ' The City hereby incorporates by reference tables/sections of the District School Board Financially Feasible Capital Improvement Program that includes proposed school capacity at the adopted Levels of Service sufficient to meet anticipated student demands projected by the School Board, in consultation with the City. Policy CT4,1.2 'Adopted Level of Service Standard for Pasco County Public Schools. The levels of service standards for public school facilities are defined as school enrollment as a percentage of school student capacity based upon the Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH). The level-of service standard is the maximum level'of school utilization that will be permitted -in the Pasco County School District. The level of service standards shall be established for all school types within the Pasco County School District as: a. . Elementary Schools 115% of FISH capacity b. Middle Schools 115% of FISH capacity c. ' High Schools 105% of FISH capacity_ d. Alternative Educational Facilities 70% of FISH capacity 2 OR BK 7970 PG 776 23 of 114 Policy CI 4.1.3 Annual Updates The City,in coordination with the.District School Board of Pasco County shall annually update the Capital Improvements Element reflecting the adopted School Board Capital Improvements Program or Ten-Year Capital Improvements Program to ensure maintenance of a financially feasible capital improvements program and to ensure that level of service standards will continue to be l achieved'and maintained. Annual plan amendments shall include the addition of a new fifth year to the Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements updating of the Financially Feasible Capital Improvement Element, coordinating the program with the Five-Year District Facilities Work Plan, and as necessary, updates- to the Concurrency Service Area maps The annual plan amendments shall ensure that the Comprehensive' Plan continues to be financially feasible and that the level of service standards -will continue to be achieved and maintained. . Policy CI 4.1.4 Financial Responsibility for the School Board's Capital • Projects • • The City, by incorporating the District School Board of Pasco County Capital Improvements Programs into this Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the requirements of Florida Statutes, is not liable for the funding of any School Board capital project or any requirements of the School Board's District'Facilities Work Plan. 3 OR BK 7970 PG 777 24 i of 114 PASCO COU ITY SCHOOL DISTRICT I 2007-2008 Wo k Plan TRODUCTION e 5-Year District Facilities Work Program is a very important document.The Department of Education,Legislature,Governor's Office,Division of Corn unity anning(growth management),local governments,and others use the work program information for various needs including funding,planning,and as t e thoritative source for school facilities related information. e district's facilities work program must be a complete,balanced capital outlay plan that is financially feasible.The first year of the work program is the listricts capital outlay buget.To determine the work program is balanced and financially feasible,the"Net Available Revenue"minus the"Funded Projects Co ts" P if P 9 should sum to zero for"Remaining Funds". If the"Remainin Funds"balance is zero,then.the plan is both balanced and financially feasible. If the"Remainin Funds"balance is negative,then the plan is neither balanced nor feasible. If the"Remainin Funds"balance is greater than zero,the plan may be feasible,but it is not balanced. Summary of revenue/expenditures available for new.construction!,and remodeling projects only. 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011 -2012 Five fear Total Total Revenues $87,127,600 $22,366,995 $31,833,923 $30,605,037 $37,259,000 $2091,192,555 Total Project Costs $87,127,600 $22,366,995 $31,833,923 $30,605,037 $37,259,000 $209,192,555 Differe ce(Remaining Funds) $0 $0 $0 $0 ' $0 $0 District PASCO COUNT Y SCHOOL DISTRICT Fiscal Year Ran e ERTIFICAT�ON y submitting this electronic document,we certify that all information provided in this 5-year district facilities work program is accurate,all capital outlay r sources re fully reportec,and the expenditures planned represent a complete and balanced capital outlay plan for the district.The district Superintendent and Chief Financial Officer have approved the information contained in this 5-year district facilitiesjwork program,and they have approved this submission and certify to the Department of E ucation,Office of Educational Facilities,that the information contained herein_is correct and accurate.We understand that any information contained in this 5-year district facilities work program is subject to audit by the Auditor General of the State of Florida. I � " DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT Heather Fiorentino CHIEF FINANCI L OFFICER Olga Swinson DISTRICT POIN -OF-CONTACT PERSON Chris Williams JOB TITLE Director of Planning PHONE NUMBI R 8137947970 SUN COM NUM IER 597-7978 E-MAIL ADDRE iS cwilliam@pasco.k12.fl.us I � Page 1 of 29 1 9/27/2007 4: 1:06 PM 1 . OR 8K 7970 PG 77 25 of 114 PASCO COI NTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2007-2008 Wo k Plan x endtures xpenditure for Maintenance, Repair and Renovation Annually,prior to the adoption of the district school budget,each school board must prepare a tentative district facilities work program that includes a sc edule of major repair andl renovation projects necessary to maintain the educational and ancillary facilities of the district. 3c" [ c4 z .. �,� ��� Item � �� '�'��pE r 200721�1$� 2008-2009 �u 2009-2010' �'�2010-2011- E 20'1 Q12 �` �� Total §� 7'r. .� .:..4 �Si (� � Actual Budget E, Projected E Projected ro Projected u� U Projectedas ea 1 HVAC $6,398,414 $5,655,000 $4,604,020 $5,713,704 $5,410,000 .$27,781,138 Locations ADMINISTRATION BUILDING,ANCLOTE ELEMENTARY,BAYONET POINT MIDDLE,CALUSA ELEMENTARY,CENTENNIAL ELEMENTARY,CENTENNIAL MIDDLE,CENTRAL BUS GARAGE,CHASCO ELEMENTARY,CHASCO MIDDLE,CHESTER W TAYLOR JR ELEMENTARY,COTEE RIVER ELEMENTARY,CYPRESS ELEMENTARY,DEER PARK ELEMENTARY,DENHAM OAKS ELEMENTARY, DISTRICT MAINTENANCE BUILDING(MOON LAKE),DOUBLE BRANCH ELEMENTARY,EAST BUS GARAGE,ENERGY&MARINE CENTER,FOX HOLLOW ELEMENTARY,FRED K MARCHMAN TECHNICAL EDUCATIONAL CENTER,GULF HIGH,GULF MIDDL , GULFSIDE ELEMENTARY,HARRY SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER,HUDSON ELEMENTARY,HUDSON MIDDLE,HUDSO SENIOR HIGH,J W MITCHELL SENIOR HIGH,JAMES IRVIN EDUCATION CENTER,JAMES M MARLOWE ELEMENTARY,LACOUCHEE ELEMENTARY,LAKE MYRTLE ELEMENTARY,LAND O LAKES SENIOR HIGH,LONGLEAF ELEMENTARY,MARY GIELLA ELEMENTARY, MITTYE P LOCKE ELEMENTARY,MOON LAKE ELEMENTARY,MOORE-MICKENS EDUCATION CENTER,NORTHWEST BUS GARAGE, NORTHWEST ELEMENTARY,PASCO ELEMENTARY,PASCO MIDDLE,PASCO SENIOR HIGH,PINE VIEW ELEMENTARY,PIN F VIEW MIDDLE,QUAIL HOLLOW ELEMENTARY,RAYMOND B STEWART MIDDLE,RICHEY ELEMENTARY,RIDGEWOOD SENIOR HIGH, RIVER RIDGE MIDDLE SENIOR HIGH,RODNEY B COX ELEMENTARY,SAN ANTONIO ELEMENTARY,SAND PINE ELEMENTARY, SANDERS MEMORIAL ELEMENTARY,SCHRADER ELEMENTARY,SEVEN OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL,SEVEN SPRINGS ELEMENTARY,SEVEN SPRINGS MIDDLE,SHADY HILLS ELEMENTARY,SOUTHEAST BUS GARAGE,SUNRAY ELEMENTARY, THOMAS E WEIGHTMAN MIDDLE,TRINITY ELEMENTARY,TRINITY OAKS ELEMENTARY,WESLEY CHAPEL ELEMENTARY,WESLEY CHAPEL SENIOR HIGH,WEST BUS GARAGE,WEST ZEPHYRHILLS ELEMENTARY,WOODLAND ELEMENTARY,ZEPHYRHILL9 SENIOR HIGH Flooring $265,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $400,000 $1,565,000 Locations: CENTENNIAL ELEMENTARY,COTEE RIVER ELEMENTARY,CREWS LAKE MIDDLE,CYPRESS ELEMENTARY,DEER PARK ELEMENTARY,DENHAM OAKS ELEMENTARY,FOX HOLLOW ELEMENTARY,GULF HIGH,GULFSIDE ELEMENTARY,HUDSON MIDDLE,HUDSON SENIOR HIGH,MARY GIELLA ELEMENTARY,MOORE-MICKENS EDUCATION CENTER,PINE VIEW MIDDL ,SAN ANTONIO ELEMENTARY,SAND PINE ELEMENTARY,SCHRADER ELEMENTARY,ZEPHYRHILLS SENIOR HIGH oofing $4,804,903 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $10,804,903 Locations: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING,CALUSA ELEMENTARY,CENTENNIAL ELEMENTARY,CENTRAL BUS GARAGE,CHASCO ELEMENTARY, CHASCO MIDDLE,DEER PARK ELEMENTARY,EAST BUS GARAGE,FOX HOLLOW ELEMENTARY,GULF MIDDLE,HUDSON ELEMENTARY,HUDSON MIDDLE,LAKE MYRTLE ELEMENTARY,,LAND O LAKES SENIOR HIGH,MITTYE P LOCKE ELEMENTARY, NORTHWEST BUS GARAGE,PASCO MIDDLE,PASCO SENIOR HIGH,PINE VIEW MIDDLE,QUAIL HOLLOW ELEMENTARY,R4YMOND B STEWART MIDDLE,RIVER RIDGE MIDDLE SENIOR HIGH,SEVEN SPRINGS ELEMENTARY Safety to Life $152,000 $50000 $500001 $50,000 $50,000 18352,000 Locations': HARRY SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER,PASCO SENIOR HIGH,PINE VIEW MIDDLE Fencing $101,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $301,000 Locations: CHESTER W TAYLOR JR ELEMENTARY,CYPRESS ELEMENTARY,FRED K MARCHMAN TECHNICAL EDUCATIONAL CENTEF , HUDSON ELEMENTARY,J W MITCHELL SENIOR HIGH,NORTHWEST BUS GARAGE,SEVEN OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL,SEVEN SPRINGS MIDDLE Parking $1,558,300 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $5,058,300 Locations: BAYONET POINT MIDDLE,CALUSA ELEMENTARY,COTEE RIVER ELEMENTARY,CYPRESS ELEMENTARY,DEER PARK ELEMENTARY,DENHAM OAKS ELEMENTARY,FOX HOLLOW ELEMENTARY,GULF HIGH,GULF HIGHLANDS ELEMENTARY, 3ULF MIDDLE,GULFSIDE ELEMENTARY,HUDSON ELEMENTARY,HUDSON MIDDLE,J W MITCHELL SENIOR HIGH,MARY GIELLA ELEMENTARY,NORTHWEST BUS GARAGE,NORTHWEST ELEMENTARY,PASCO ELEMENTARY,PASCO MIDDLE,SAN ANT Q NIO ELEMENTARY,SCHRADER ELEMENTARY,SEVEN SPRINGS MIDDLE,SHADY HILLS ELEMENTARY,WEST BUS GARAGE, WOODLAND ELEMENTARY Electrical $0 $300000 $300,000 $550,000 $300,000 1,450,000 Location : BAYONET POINT MIDDLE,CENTENNIAL ELEMENTARY,GULF MIDDLE,HUDSON ELEMENTARY,HUDSON SENIOR HIGH,LA D O LAKES SENIOR HIGH,PASCO SENIOR HIGH,RAYMOND B STEWART MIDDLE,RIDGEWOOD SENIOR HIGH,WOODLAND ELEMENTARY,ZEPHYRHILLS SENIOR HIGH Page 2 of 29 • 9/27/2007 :21:06 PM K 7970 PG 779 26 of 114 PASCO CO JNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2007-2008 t rk Plan Fire Alarm $885,500 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 2,085,500 Locations: COTEE RIVER ELEMENTARY,CYPRESS ELEMENTARY,DEER PARK ELEMENTARY,DENHAM OAKS ELEMENTARY,DISTRI T MAINTENANCE BUILDING(MOON LAKE),EAST BUS GARAGE,FOX HOLLOW ELEMENTARY,GULF HIGH,GULF MIDDLE,GU FSIDE ELEMENTARY,HARRY SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER,LAKE MYRTLE ELEMENTARY,MARY GIELLA ELEMENTARY,MOON LAKE ELEMENTARY,MOORE-MICKENS EDUCATION CENTER,NORTHWEST BUS GARAGE,NORTHWEST ELEMENTARY, RIDGEWOOD SENIOR HIGH,RIVER RIDGE MIDDLE SENIOR HIGH,WEST BUS GARAGE,ZEPHYRHILLS SENIOR HIGH Telephone/Intercom System $1,000,000 $1,030',000 $1,060,900 $1,092,727 $1,147,363 5,330,990 Locations: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING,ANCLOTE ELEMENTARY,BAYONET POINT MIDDLE,CALUSA ELEMENTARY,CENTENNIAL ELEMENTARY,CENTENNIAL MIDDLE,CENTRAL BUS GARAGE,CHARLES S.RUSHE MIDDLE,CHASCO ELEMENTARY,CHASCO MIDDLE,CHESTER W TAYLOR JR ELEMENTARY,COTEE RIVER ELEMENTARY,CREWS LAKE MIDDLE,CYPRESS ELEMENTARY, DEER PARK ELEMENTARY, DENHAM OAKS ELEMENTARY,DISTRICT MAINTENANCE BUILDING(MOON LAKE),DOUBLE BRANCH ELEMENTARY,DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE,EAST BUS GARAGE,ENERGY&MARINE CENTER,FOX HOLLOW ELEMENTARY,FRED K MARCHMAN TECHNICAL EDUCATIONAL CENTER,GULF HIGH,GULF HIGHLANDS ELEMENTARY,GULF MIDDLE,GULF TRACE ELEMENTARY,GULFSIDE ELEMENTARY,HARRY SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER,HUDSON ELEMENTARY,HUDSON IYIIDDLE, HUDSON SENIOR HIGH,J W MITCHELL SENIOR HIGH,JAMES IRVIN EDUCATION CENTER,JAMES M MARLOWE ELEMENT RY, LACOOCHEE ELEMENTARY,LAKE MYRTLE ELEMENTARY,LAND O LAKES SENIOR HIGH,LONGLEAF ELEMENTARY,MARY GIELLA ELEMENTARY,MITTYE P LOCKE ELEMENTARY,MOON LAKE ELEMENTARY,MOORE-MICKENS EDUCATION CENTER,NEW RIVER ELEMENTARY,NORTHWEST BUS GARAGE,NORTHWEST ELEMENTARY,OAKSTEAD ELEMENTARY,PASCO ELEMENTARY PASCO MIDDLE,PASCO SENIOR HIGH,PAUL R SMITH MIDDLE,PINE VIEW ELEMENTARY,PINE VIEW MIDDLE,QUAIL HOLLOW ELEMENTARY,RAYMOND B STEWART MIDDLE,RICHEY ELEMENTARY,RIDGEWOOD SENIOR HIGH,RIVER RIDGE MIDDLE SENIOR HIGH,RODNEY B COX ELEMENTARY,SAN ANTONIO ELEMENTARY,SAND PINE ELEMENTARY,SANDERS MEMORIAL ELEMENTARY, SCHRADER ELEMENTARY,SEVEN OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL,SEVEN SPRINGS ELEMENTARY,SEVEN SPRINGS MIDDLE, SHADY HILLS ELEMENTARY,SOUTHEAST BUS GARAGE,SUNLAKE HIGH,SUNRAY ELEMENTARY,THOMAS E WEIGHTMAN MIDDLE, TRILBY ADULT EDUCATION CENTER,TRINITY ELEMENTARY,TRINITY OAKS ELEMENTARY,VETERANS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, WESLEY CHAPEL ELEMENTARY,WESLEY CHAPEL SENIOR HIGH,WEST BUS GARAGE,WEST ZEPHYRHILLS ELEMENTARY', WIREGRASS RANCH SENIOR HIGH,WOODLAND ELEMENTARY,ZEPHYRHILLS SENIOR HIGH Closed Circuit ljelevision $0 $150000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $600,000 II Locations: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING,BAYONET POINT MIDDLE,CALUSA ELEMENTARY,CHASCO ELEMENTARY,CHASCO MIDDLE,COTEE RIVER ELEMENTARY,DENHAM OAKS ELEMENTARY,FOX HOLLOW ELEMENTARY,FRED K MARCHMAN TECHNICAL EDUCATIONAL CENTER,GULF HIGH,GULF MIDDLE,HARRY SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER,HUDSON ELEMENTARY,J W MITCHELL SENIOR HIGH,JAMES M MARLOWE ELEMENTARY,LAKE MYRTLE ELEMENTARY,LAND O LAKES SENIOR HIGH,MARY GIELLA ELEMENTARY,MOORE-MICKENS EDUCATION CENTER,PASCO ELEMENTARY,PASCO MIDDLE,PASCO SENIOR HIGH,PINE VIEW MIDDLE,QUAIL HOLLOW ELEMENTARY,RAYMOND B STEWART MIDDLE,RIDGEWOOD SENIOR HIGH,SAN ANTONIO ELEMENTARY, SAND PINE ELEMENTARY,SEVEN SPRINGS ELEMENTARY,SEVEN SPRINGS MIDDLE,SHADY HILLS ELEMENTARY,WESL jY CHAPEL SENIOR HIGH,WOODLAND ELEMENTARY,ZEPHYRHILLS SENIOR HIGH Paint $549,500 $500,000 $550,000 $600,000 $650,000 2,849,500 Locations: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING,ANCLOTE ELEMENTARY,BAYONET POINT MIDDLE,CALUSA ELEMENTARY,CENTENNIAL ELEMENTARY,CENTENNIAL MIDDLE,CENTRAL BUS GARAGE,CHARLES S.RUSHE MIDDLE,CHASCO ELEMENTARY,CHA CO MIDDLE,CHESTER W TAYLOR JR ELEMENTARY,COTEE RIVER ELEMENTARY,CREWS LAKE MIDDLE,CYPRESS ELEMENTARY, DEER PARK ELEMENTARY,DENHAM OAKS ELEMENTARY,DISTRICT MAINTENANCE BUILDING(MOON LAKE),DOUBLE BRANCH ELEMENTARY,DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE,EAST BUS GARAGE,ENERGY&MARINE CENTER,FOX HOLLOW ELEMENTARY,F ED K MARCHMAN TECHNICAL EDUCATIONAL CENTER,GULF HIGH,GULF HIGHLANDS ELEMENTARY,GULF MIDDLE,GULF TRA E ELEMENTARY,GULFSIDE ELEMENTARY,HARRY SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER,HUDSON ELEMENTARY,HUDSON MIDDLE, HUDSON SENIOR HIGH,J W MITCHELL SENIOR HIGH,JAMES IRVIN EDUCATION CENTER,JAMES M MARLOWE ELEMENTARY, LACOOCHEE ELEMENTARY,LAKE MYRTLE ELEMENTARY,LAND O LAKES SENIOR HIGH,LONGLEAF ELEMENTARY,MARY'GIELLA ELEMENTARY,MITTYE P LOCKE ELEMENTARY,MOON LAKE ELEMENTARY,MOORE-MICKENS EDUCATION CENTER, NEW RIVER ELEMENTARY,NORTHWEST BUS GARAGE,NORTHWEST ELEMENTARY,OAKSTEAD ELEMENTARY,PASCO ELEMENTARY,PASCO MIDDLE,PASCO SENIOR HIGH,PAUL R SMITH MIDDLE,PINE VIEW ELEMENTARY,PINE VIEW MIDDLE,QUAIL HOLLOW ELEMENTARY,RAYMOND B STEWART MIDDLE,RICHEY ELEMENTARY,RIDGEWOOD SENIOR HIGH,RIVER RIDGE MIDDLE SENIOR HIGH,RODNEY B COX ELEMENTARY,SAN ANTONIO ELEMENTARY,SAND PINE ELEMENTARY,SANDERS MEMORIAL ELEMENTARY, SCHRADER ELEMENTARY,SEVEN OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL,SEVEN SPRINGS ELEMENTARY,SEVEN SPRINGS MIDDL , SHADY HILLS ELEMENTARY,SOUTHEAST BUS GARAGE,SUNLAKE HIGH,SUNRAY ELEMENTARY,THOMAS E WEIGHTMAN MIDDLE, TRILBY ADULT EDUCATION CENTER,TRINITY ELEMENTARY,TRINITY OAKS ELEMENTARY,VETERANS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, WESLEY CHAPEL ELEMENTARY,WESLEY CHAPEL SENIOR HIGH,WEST BUS GARAGE,WEST ZEPHYRHILLS ELEMENTAR WIREGRASS RANCH SENIOR HIGH,WOODLAND ELEMENTARY;ZEPHYRHILLS SENIOR HIGH Athletic Improvements $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $400,000 $1,800,000 Locations BAYONET POINT MIDDLE,CENTENNIAL ELEMENTARY,CENTENNIAL MIDDLE,CHASCO MIDDLE,FOX HOLLOW ELEMENTA Y,GULF HIGH,GULFSIDE ELEMENTARY,HUDSON MIDDLE,HUDSON SENIOR HIGH,J W MITCHELL SENIOR HIGH,LAND O LAKES S NIOR HIGH,MITTYE P LOCKE ELEMENTARY,PASCO MIDDLE,PASCO SENIOR HIGH,PINE VIEW MIDDLE,RAYMOND B STEWART MIDDLE, RIDGEWOOD SENIOR HIGH,RIVER RIDGE MIDDLE SENIOR HIGH,WESLEY CHAPEL SENIOR HIGH,WEST ZEPHYRHILLS ELEMENTARY,ZEPHYRHILLS SENIOR HIGH abinetry&MiII work $135,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $535,000 I I Page 3 of 29 9/27/2007 4 21106 PM ii OR BK 7970 PG 7 27 of 114 PASCO CO NTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2007-2008 Work Plan it Locations: CENTENNIAL ELEMENTARY,DEER PARK ELEMENTARY,GULFSIDE ELEMENTARY,HUDSON ELEMENTARY,J W MITCHELL SENIOR HIGH, MOON LAKE ELEMENTARY,RODNEY B COX ELEMENTARY,ZEPHYRHILLS SENIOR HIGH Food Service Improvements $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 3,750,000 Locations: BAYONET POINT MIDDLE,CALUSA ELEMENTARY,CENTENNIAL ELEMENTARY,CENTENNIAL MIDDLE,CHASCO MIDDLE, HESTER W TAYLOR JR ELEMENTARY,COTEE RIVER ELEMENTARY,CYPRESS ELEMENTARY,DEER PARK ELEMENTARY,DENHAM OAKS ELEMENTARY,FOX HOLLOW ELEMENTARY,FRED K MARCHMAN TECHNICAL EDUCATIONAL CENTER,GULF HIGH,GULF MIDDLE, HUDSON MIDDLE,HUDSON SENIOR HIGH,J W MITCHELL SENIOR HIGH,LAKE MYRTLE ELEMENTARY,LAND O LAKES SENIOR HIGH,MARY GIELLA ELEMENTARY,MOORE-MICKENS EDUCATION CENTER,NORTHWEST ELEMENTARY,PASCO ELEMENTARY, PASCO SENIOR HIGH,PINE VIEW MIDDLE,RAYMOND B STEWART MIDDLE,RIDGEWOOD SENIOR HIGH, RIVER RIDGE MIDDLE SENIOR HIGH,SAN ANTONIO ELEMENTARY,SANDERS MEMORIAL ELEMENTARY,SCHRADER ELEMENTARY,SEVEN SPRINGS ELEMENTARY,SEVEN SPRINGS MIDDLE,SHADY HILLS ELEMENTARY,THOMAS E WEIGHTMAN MIDDLE,WESLEY CHAPEL SENIOR HIGH,WEST ZEPHYRHILLS ELEMENTARY,WOODLAND ELEMENTARY,ZEPHYRHILLS SENIOR HIGH Landscape $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $400,000 Locations: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING,CALUSA ELEMENTARY,DENHAM OAKS ELEMENTARY,MARY GIELLA ELEMENTARY, RIVER MIDGE MIDDLE SENIOR HIGH,SHADY HILLS ELEMENTARY Masonry' $0 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $50,000 $155,000 Locations: FRED K MARCHMAN TECHNICAL EDUCATIONAL CENTER, MARY GIELLA ELEMENTARY,MITTYE P LOCKE ELEMENTARY, RIDGEWOOD SENIOR HIGH,SEVEN OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Plumbing $0 $100,000 $200,000 " $250,000 $500,000 1,050,000 Locations: ANCLOTE ELEMENTARY, BAYONET POINT MIDDLE,FOX HOLLOW ELEMENTARY,HUDSON ELEMENTARY,HUDSON SENIOR HIGH, LAKE MYRTLE ELEMENTARY,MOON LAKE ELEMENTARY, NORTHWEST ELEMENTARY,PINE VIEW MIDDLE,QUAIL HOLLO�V ELEMENTARY,RIDGEWOOD SENIOR HIGH,RIVER RIDGE MIDDLE SENIOR HIGH,SHADY HILLS ELEMENTARY Portable Relocations $1,200,000 $1,236,000 $1,273,080 $1,311,272 $1,376,836 6,397,188 Locations: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING,ANCLOTE ELEMENTARY,BAYONET POINT MIDDLE,CALUSA ELEMENTARY,CENTENNIAL ELEMENTARY,CENTENNIAL MIDDLE,CENTRAL BUS GARAGE,'CHARLES S.RUSHE MIDDLE,CHASCO ELEMENTARY,CHA CO MIDDLE,CHESTER W TAYLOR JR ELEMENTARY,COTEE RIVER ELEMENTARY,CREWS LAKE MIDDLE,CYPRESS ELEMEN1IARY, DEER PARK ELEMENTARY,DENHAM OAKS ELEMENTARY, DISTRICT MAINTENANCE BUILDING(MOON LAKE),DOUBLE BRANCH ELEMENTARY,DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE,EAST BUS GARAGE, ENERGY&MARINE CENTER,FOX HOLLOW ELEMENTARY,FED K MARCHMAN TECHNICAL EDUCATIONAL CENTER,GULF HIGH,GULF HIGHLANDS ELEMENTARY,GULF MIDDLE,GULF.TRACE ELEMENTARY,GULFSIDE ELEMENTARY,HARRY SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER,HUDSON ELEMENTARY,HUDSON MIDDLE, HUDSON SENIOR HIGH,J W MITCHELL SENIOR HIGH,JAMES IRVIN EDUCATION CENTER,JAMES M MARLOWE ELEMENT RY, LACOOCHEE ELEMENTARY,LAKE MYRTLE ELEMENTARY,LAND O LAKES SENIOR HIGH,LONGLEAF ELEMENTARY,MARY GIELLA ELEMENTARY,MITTYE P LOCKE ELEMENTARY,MOON LAKE ELEMENTARY,MOORE-MICKENS EDUCATION CENTER,NEW RIVER ELEMENTARY,NORTHWEST BUS GARAGE,NORTHWEST ELEMENTARY,OAKSTEAD ELEMENTARY,PASCO ELEMENTARY PASCO MIDDLE,PASCO SENIOR HIGH,PAUL R SMITH MIDDLE,PINE VIEW ELEMENTARY,PINE VIEW MIDDLE,QUAIL HOLLOW ELEMENTARY,RAYMOND B STEWART MIDDLE, RICHEY ELEMENTARY,RIDGEWOOD SENIOR HIGH,RIVER RIDGE MIDDLE SENIOR HIGH,RODNEY B COX ELEMENTARY,SAN ANTONIO ELEMENTARY,SAND PINE ELEMENTARY,SANDERS MEMORIAL ELEI ENTARY, SCHRADER ELEMENTARY,SEVEN OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL,SEVEN SPRINGS ELEMENTARY,SEVEN SPRINGS MIDDI E, SHADY HILLS ELEMENTARY,SOUTHEAST BUS GARAGE,S°UNLAKE HIGH,SUNRAY ELEMENTARY,THOMAS E WEIGHTMA MIDDLE, TRILBY ADULT EDUCATION CENTER,TRINITY ELEMENTARY,TRINITY OAKS ELEMENTARY,VETERANS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, WESLEY CHAPEL ELEMENTARY,WESLEY CHAPEL SENIOR HIGH,WEST BUS GARAGE,WEST ZEPHYRHILLS ELEMENTARY, WIREGRASS RANCH SENIOR HIGH,WOODLAND ELEMENTARY;ZEPHYRHILLS SENIOR HIGH Covered Sidewalks $59,835 $500,000 $780,980 $741,296 $520,000 $2,602,111 Locations ANCLOTE ELEMENTARY,BAYONET POINT MIDDLE,CALUSA ELEMENTARY,CENTENNIAL ELEMENTARY,CENTENNIAL MID LE, CHASCO ELEMENTARY,CHESTER W TAYLOR JR ELEMENTARY,COTEE RIVER ELEMENTARY,CYPRESS ELEMENTARY,,DER PARK ELEMENTARY,DENHAM OAKS ELEMENTARY,FRED K MARCHMAN TECHNICAL EDUCATIONAL CENTER,HARRY SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER,J W MITCHELL SENIOR HIGH,JAMES IRVIN EDUCATION CENTER,LAKE MYRTLE ELEMENTARY,MARY GIELLA ELEMENTARY,PASCO SENIOR HIGH,PINE VIEW ELEMENTARY,PINE VIEW MIDDLE,QUAIL HOLLOW ELEMENTARY,RAYMOND B STEWART MIDDLE,RIVER RIDGE MIDDLE SENIOR HIGH,SAN ANTONIO ELEMENTARY,SEVEN SPRINGS ELEMENTARY,SEVEN SPRINGS MIDDLE,SUNRAY ELEMENTARY,THOMAS E WEIGHTMAN MIDDLE,WESLEY CHAPEL SENIOR HIGH,WOODLAND ELEMENTARY Remodeling $2,140,000 $500,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $ ,640,000 Locations BAYONET POINT MIDDLE,DISTRICT MAINTENANCE BUILDING(MOON LAKE),GULF MIDDLE,HUDSON MIDDLE,NORTHWEST ELEMENTARY,PASCO MIDDLE,PASCO SENIOR HIGH,RODNEY B COX ELEMENTARY,SCHRADER ELEMENTARY Renovations $8,387,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1 ,887,000 Locations DISTRICT MAINTENANCE BUILDING(MOON LAKE),FRED K MARCHMAN TECHNICAL EDUCATIONAL CENTER,GULF HIGH,GULF MIDDLE,HUDSON MIDDLE,LAND O LAKES SENIOR HIGH,MOORE-MICKENS EDUCATION CENTER,PASCO SENIOR HIGH,PINE VIEW MIDDLE,RAYMOND B STEWART MIDDLE,RIVER RIDGE MIDDLE SENIOR HIGH,ZEPHYRHILLS SENIOR HIGH Page 4 of 29 9/27/2007 4:121:06 PM 0R BK 7970 PG 781 ii 28 of 114 PASCO CO JNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2007-2008 W rk Plan• SecurityAlarm $537,460 $150000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000. 1,137,460 Locations: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING,CALUSA ELEMENTARY,CHASCO ELEMENTARY,CHASCO MIDDLE,COTEE RIVER ELEMENTARY, DENHAM OAKS ELEMENTARY,DISTRICT MAINTENANCE BUILDING(MOON LAKE),FRED K MARCHMAN TECHNICAL EDUCATIONAL CENTER,GULF MIDDLE,HARRY SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER,HUDSON ELEMENTARY,HUDSON SENIOR HIGH,J 1IV MITCHELL SENIOR HIGH,JAMES M MARLOWE ELEMENTARY, LAKE MYRTLE ELEMENTARY,LAND 0 LAKES SENIOR HIGH,]MARY GIELLA ELEMENTARY,MOORE-MICKENS EDUCATION CENTER,PASCO ELEMENTARY,PASCO MIDDLE,PASCO SENIOR HUGH,PINE VIEW MIDDLE,RAYMOND B STEWART MIDDLE,RIVER RIDGE MIDDLE SENIOR HIGH,SAN ANTONIO ELEMENTARY,SAND PINE ELEMENTARY,SEVEN SPRINGS ELEMENTARY,SEVEN SPRINGS MIDDLE,SHADY HILLS ELEMENTARY,TRINITY ELEMENTAARY, WOODLAND ELEMENTARY,ZEPHYRHILLS SENIOR HIGH Pavement Maintenance $479,800 $450000 $450,000 $500,000 $550,000 2,429,800 I I Location : ADMINISTRATION BUILDING,ANCLOTE ELEMENTARY,BAYONET POINT MIDDLE,CALUSA ELEMENTARY,CENTENNIAL ELEMENTARY,CENTENNIAL MIDDLE,CENTRAL BUS GARAGE,CHARLES S.RUSHE MIDDLE,CHASCO ELEMENTARY,CHASCO { MIDDLE,CHESTER W TAYLOR JR ELEMENTARY,COTEE RIVER ELEMENTARY,CREWS LAKE MIDDLE,CYPRESS ELEMENI� RY, DEER PARK ELEMENTARY,DENHAM OAKS ELEMENTARY, DISTRICT MAINTENANCE BUILDING(MOON LAKE),DOUBLE BRANCH ELEMENTARY,DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE,EAST BUS GARAGE,ENERGY&MARINE CENTER,FOX HOLLOW ELEMENTARY,FRED K MARCHMAN TECHNICAL EDUCATIONAL CENTER,GULF HIGH,GULF HIGHLANDS ELEMENTARY,GULF MIDDLE,GULF TRACE ELEMENTARY,GULFSIDE ELEMENTARY,HARRY SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER,HUDSON ELEMENTARY,HUDSON MIDDLE, HUDSON SENIOR HIGH,J W MITCHELL SENIOR HIGH,JAMES IRVIN EDUCATION CENTER,JAMES M MARLOWE ELEMENT RY, LACOOCHEE ELEMENTARY,LAKE MYRTLE ELEMENTARY,LAND 0 LAKES SENIOR HIGH,LONGLEAF ELEMENTARY,MARY GIELLA ELEMENTARY,MITTYE P LOCKE ELEMENTARY,MOON LAKE ELEMENTARY,MOORE-MICKENS EDUCATION CENTER,NEW RIVER ELEMENTARY,NORTHWEST BUS GARAGE,NORTHWEST ELEMENTARY,OAKSTEAD ELEMENTARY,PASCO ELEMENTARY PASCO MIDDLE,PASCO SENIOR HIGH,PAUL R SMITH MIDDLE,PINE VIEW ELEMENTARY,PINE VIEW MIDDLE,QUAIL HOLLOW ELEMENTARY,RAYMOND B STEWART MIDDLE,RICHEY ELEMENTARY,RIDGEWOOD SENIOR HIGH,RIVER RIDGE MIDDLE SENIOR HIGH,RODNEY B COX ELEMENTARY,SAN ANTONIO ELEMENTARY,SAND PINE ELEMENTARY,SANDERS MEMORIAL ELEF ENTARY, SCHRADER ELEMENTARY,SEVEN OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL,SEVEN SPRINGS ELEMENTARY,SEVEN SPRINGS MIDDLE, SHADY HILLS ELEMENTARY,SOUTHEAST BUS GARAGE,SUNLAKE HIGH,SUNRAY ELEMENTARY,THOMAS E WEIGHTMA MIDDLE, TRILBY ADULT EDUCATION CENTER,TRINITY ELEMENTARY,TRINITY OAKS ELEMENTARY,VETERANS ELEMENTARY SCHIOOL, WESLEY CHAPEL ELEMENTARY,WESLEY CHAPEL SENIOR HIGH,WEST BUS GARAGE,WEST ZEPHYRHILLS ELEMENTARY, WIREGRASS RANCH SENIOR HIGH,WOODLAND ELEMENTARY,ZEPHYRHILLS SENIOR HIGH Window&Door Replmnts $54,500 $300,000 $420,000 $450,000 $500,000 1,724,500 Locations: ANCLOTE ELEMENTARY,BAYONET POINT MIDDLE,CALUSA ELEMENTARY,CENTENNIAL ELEMENTARY,COTEE RIVER ELEMENTARY,CYPRESS ELEMENTARY,FOX HOLLOW ELEMENTARY,FRED K MARCHMAN TECHNICAL EDUCATIONAL CE TER, HUDSON SENIOR HIGH,JAMES M MARLOWE ELEMENTARY,LAND 0 LAKES SENIOR HIGH,MARY GIELLA ELEMENTARY,MOORE- MICKENS EDUCATION CENTER,NORTHWEST ELEMENTARY,SCHRADER ELEMENTARY,SEVEN SPRINGS ELEMENTARY,SHADY HILLS ELEMENTARY,WEST ZEPHYRHILLS ELEMENTARY,WOODLAND ELEMENTARY,ZEPHYRHILLS SENIOR HIGH tater,Sewer, Pond Impvmt $87,800 $60;000 $60,000 $60,000 $70,000 $337,800 Locations ADMINISTRATION BUILDING,BAYONET POINT MIDDLE,CYPRESS ELEMENTARY,HUDSON ELEMENTARY,MARY GIELLA ELEMENTARY,MITTYE P LOCKE ELEMENTARY,MOON LAKE ELEMENTARY,MOORE-MICKENS EDUCATION CENTER,PAS IO SENIOR HIGH,QUAIL HOLLOW ELEMENTARY,SCHRADER ELEMENTARY Vocational Improvements $315,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 1,515,000 Locations BAYONET POINT MIDDLE,CENTENNIAL ELEMENTARY,GULF HIGH,GULF MIDDLE,HUDSON MIDDLE,HUDSON SENIOR HI H,LAND 0 LAKES SENIOR HIGH,PASCO SENIOR HIGH,PINE VIEW MIDDLE,RIDGEWOOD SENIOR HIGH,RIVER RIDGE MIDDLE SENIOR HIGH,THOMAS E WEIGHTMAN MIDDLE,ZEPHYRHILLS SENIOR HIGH Maintenance Expenditure Totals: $30,211,012 $15,766,000 $17,833,980 $18,403,999 $19,324,199 $101,539,190 Local Two ill Expenditure For Maintenance, Repair and Renovation Anticipated expenditures expected from local funding sources over the years covered by the current work plan. Hey a 20b7 2008 j 200$ 009' 2409 2010 2010.2111 `1011 2012 f bta[ Actual udget ;y Projected Projctel Projpced PrJ cted Minor Maintena ce/Repair $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Maintenance/Relpair Salaries $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 School Bus Purchases $0 $4;500,000 $4,725,000 $4,961,250 $5,209,313 $1 ,395,563 Ither Vehicle Pilirchases $750,000 $772,500 $795,675 $819,545 $860,523 $ ,998,243 Page 5 of 29 9/27/20074121:06 PM OR BK 7970 PG 72 29 of 114 PASCO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2007-2008 Wo k Plan apital Outlay Equipment $9,953,270 $12,101,868 $5,254,924 $5,412,572 $5,683,200 $3 405,834 ent/Lease Payments $0 !$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 OP Debt Service $20,584,830 $24,919,298 $24,921,770 $29,918,954 $26,668,067 $12 ,012,919 Rent/Lease Rel Icatables $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Environmental Pfoblems $200,000 $206,000 $212,180 $218,545 $229,473 $1,066,198 I I s.1011.14 Debt Service $0 I$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Remodeling $0 i$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 One Cent-1/2 dent Sales Surtax Debt Service $8,644,785 $14,219,350 $14,217,750 $14,219,750 $14,218,250 $6 ,519,885 Special Facilities Account $0 i$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Carryover $20,232,511 i$0 $0 $0 $0 $2?,232511 ,232,511 Local Expenditure Totals: $60,365,396 $56,719,016 $50,127,299 $55,550,616 $52,868,826 $27 6,631,153 State PECO unds For Maintenance, Repair and Renovation Anticipated expenditures expected from state funding sources over the years covered by the current work plan. Item `` 2Y07 20Q 2008 2008 X 200 rt 06 Q 0 201b-2011 2011 2D32 'iota[ A teal Budget ProjeefedF Projected Projected Projected r PECO Used for Maintenance,Repair,and Renovation $3,829,874 $2,783,165 $2,687,441 $2,657,437 $2,790,309 $14,748,226 Health and Safe{Ily $425,542 $309,241 $298,605 $295,271 $310,034 $±,638,693 State PECO Maintenance Totals: $4,255,416 $3,092,406 $2,986,046 $2,952,708 $3,100,343 $16,386,919 f I Page 6 of 29 9/27/20074 21:06 PM OR BK 7970 PG 783 30 of 114 PASCO CO JNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2007-2008 Work Plan Reven e 2 Mill Revenue Source Schedule of Estimated Capital Outlay Revenue from each currently approved source which is estimated to be available for expenditures on the projects included in the tentative district facilities work program.All amounts are NET after considering carryover balances,interest earned,new COP's, 1011.14 and 1011.15 loans,etc.Distr'cts cannot use 2-Mill funds for salaries except for those explicitly associated with maintenance/repair projects.(1011.71 (5),F.S.) �,�' r item E Fund n 007-200& 2008-2009 2009 2010 201d-2041 ?01i-2012 Total Actual Value „..Projected z Projected Projected t.. Projected 1 Non-exem roe $29,729,044,446 $31,215,496,668 $32,77 7 0 3Y ,( ) p property rty 16,271,501 $34,415,085,076 $36,135,839,330 $164,271,737,021 assessed valuation 1 (2)The Millege�rojected for 1.50 1.50 I 1.50 1.50 1.50 discretionary capital outlay per s.1011.71 (3)Full value oflthe 2-Mill $56,485,184 $59,309,444 $62,274,916 $65,388,662 $68,658,095 $312,116,301 discretionary capital outlay per s.1011.71 (4)Value of thelportion of the 2- 370 $42,363,888 $44,482,083 $46,706,187 $49,041,496 $51,493,571 $234,087,22 Mills ACTUALLY levied (5)Difference oT lines(3)and(4) $14,121,296 $14,827,361 $1;5,568,729 $16,347,166 $17,164,524 $78,029,0761 I I I PECO Reve ue Source The figure in the row designated"PECO Maintenance"will be subtracted from funds available for new construction because PECO maintenance dollars cannot be used for new construction. I. "k Item Fund 20074.b08 j2008-20O 20Q9-2010 , 2010 2t1 2011 2012 k Total r F bT. 4 ...... . � dual Bud et` ProjectedProjected ' P b tided Projected ECO New Corjstruction 340 $15,796,217 $1,230,239 $1,913,459 $2,205,363 $2,524,168 $23,669,4461 ECO Maintenance $4,255,416 $3,092,406 $2,986,045 $2,952,708 $2,986,045 $16,272,620 $20,051,633 $4,322,645 $4,899,504 $5,158,071 $5,510,213 $39,942,066 CO & DS Re renue Source Revenue from Capital Outlay and Debt Service funds: E €€ Item pd 20b7�2008 2008-2009 t€ 2009-2010° 2010-2011 2011-2012 Tb t,,t Actual Budget Projected Projected € RrbjeCted a u a €Proje ted CO&DS Cash low-through 360 $490,687 $490,687 $490,687 $490,687 $490,687 $2,453,435 Distributed CO&DS Interest on 360 $62,641 $62,641 $62,641 $62,641 $62,641 $313,205 Undistributed C $553,328 $553,328 $553,328 $553,328 $553,328 $2,766,640 Fair Share Revenue Source All legally binding commitments for proportionate fair-share mitigation for impacts on public school facilities must be included in the 5-year district work p ogram. I . . Page 7 of 29 i 9/27/20074: 1:06 PM OR BK 7970 PG 78 31 of 114 PASCO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2007-2008 Work Plan othing repo ted for this section. I. Sales Surtax Referendum Specific inform tion about any referendum for a 1-cent or 1A-cent surtax referendum during the previous year. Did the school district hold a surtax referendum during the past fiscal year(20061-2007)? No I " Additional fevenue Source Any additional revenue sources e r r Item 3'h t` t 2007 2008 = 200S-2009 2009.2010, p01O-2011 2011 2012 otai E al Rctuat Value � �Profecfecl �, r�`�ro)ected�� ��Profoj ctd`'� ��prbteted Classrooms for Kids $37,066,223 $0 j $0 $0 $0 $37,066,223 Proceeds from al s.1011.14/15 F.S.Loans $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 District Bonds-�/oted local bond $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $01 referendum proceeds per s.9,Art VII State Constitution Proceeds from Special Act Bonds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o! � I Istimated Reve ue from CO&DS Bond $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ale roceeds from 1/oted Capital $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 provements Tillage ther Revenue for Other Capital Projects $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 Proceeds from 1/2 cent sales surtax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 authorized by s,hoot board Proceeds from I cal governmental $29,439,294 $31,627,361 $33,208,729 $34,869,165 $36,612,624 $165,757,173 infrastructure sales surtax Proceeds from Certificates of $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 Participation(COP's)Sale Classrooms First Bond proceeds amount $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 authorized in FYI 1997-98 Effort Index Gra is $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0'. District Equity Recognition $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $01' Federal Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Proportionate s11are mitigation(actual $0 . $0 j $0 $0 $0 $0 cash revenue only,not in kind donations) Impact fees received $15,000,000 $15,459,000 $15,913,500 $16,390,300 $16,882,632 $79,645,432 II Private donations $0 $0 i $0 $0 $0 $0 Grants from local l governments or not-for- $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 profit organizations r cluding Profit On Investment $3,837,656 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $9,837,656 rom Bonds pledging proceeds $0 $0 1 $o $0 $0 $0 t or 12 cent Sales Surtax Page 8 of 29 1 9/27/2007 4 21:06 PM OR BK 7970 0 p0 785 32 of 114 PASCO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2007-2008 W rk Plan Fund Balance Carried Forward $33,647,402 $0 $0 $0 $0 $33,647,402 bligated Fund Balance Carried Forward $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 pecial Facilities Account $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 Subtotal $118,990,575 $48,586,361 $50,622,229 $52,759,465 $54,995,256 $325,953,8861 Total Revenue Summary ltenl NameF 2007-2008 20b8-2009 r 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011 2012 Five Year Total Budget; p qjecteci Projected Projected h,'Projected �x d Local Two Mill Discretionary Capital $42,363,888 $44,482,083 $46,706,187 $49,041,496 $51,493,571 $234,087,2251 Outlay Revenue Maintenance Ex' enditures ($30,211,012) ($15,766,000) ($17,833,980) ($18,403,999) ($19,324,199) ($101,539,190) i . 2 Mill Other Eligible Expenditures ($60,365,396) ($56,719,016) ($50,127,299) ($55,550,616) ($52,868,826) ($275,631,153) PECO Maintenance Expenditures ($4,255,416) ($3,092,406) ($2,986,046) ($2,952,708) ($3,100,343) ($16,386,919) PECO Maintenance Revenue $4,255,416 $3,092,406 $2,986,045 $2,952,708 $2,986,045 $16,272,620 ($48,212,520) ($28,002,933) ($21,255,093) ($24,913,119) ($20,813,752) ($143,197,417) I I ahem Karne 2001-2O08 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2Q11 2{1,1 r 2012 Frug Year Total Budget P{njec e Protected � Projected Projected O&DS Revenue $553,328 $553,328 $553,328 $553,328 $553,328 $2,766,640 1ECO New Construction Revenue $15,796,217 $1,230,239 $1,913,459 $2,205,363 $2,524,168 $23,669,446 Other/Additional Revenue $118,990,575 $48,586,361 $50,622,229 $52,759,465 $54,995,256 $325,953,886 Subtotal $135,340,120 $50,369,928 $53,089,016 $55,518,156 $58,072,752 $352,389,972 R . Grand Total $87,127,600 $22,366,995 $31,833,923 $30,605,037 $37,259,000 $209,192,555 I I Page 9 of 29 9/27/2007 4:21:06 PM OR BK 7970 PG 786 33 of 114 PASCO COI NTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2007-2008 Wc rk Plan ro'ect Schedules .apacity Pr ject Schedules A schedule of capital outlay projects necessary to ensure the availability of satisfactory classrooms for the projected student enrollment in K-12 program 1 2óö S' .m3'x ,•5 Tx 0 8 t i � s ern �1 t70 2008 0 Ot?90 9 01 tlt?1 tl r t 1 2tl11 tl ti' t rode 2 0 0 � 2 �1 � n,_'-x. Elementary R Location not Planned $21,500,000 - •I$0 $0 $0 $0 $21,500,000 Yes specified Cost: Student Stations: 762 0 0 0 0 762 ] Total Classrooms: 40 0 0 0 0 40 11 Gross Sq Ft: 112,903 0 0 0 0 112,903 Elementary V Location not Planned $21,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $21,500,000 Yes specified Cost: Student Stations: 762 10 0 0 0 762 Total Classrooms: 40 0 0 0 0 40 Gross Sq Ft: 112,903 0 0 0 0 112,903 Classroom Wing SAN ANTONIO Planned $2,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,200,000 Yes I __________ ELEMENTARY Cost: Student Stations: 144 0 0 0 - 0 144 Total Classrooms: 8 0 0 0 0 8 Gross Sq Ft: 10,672 0 0 0 0 10,672 Classroom Wing RICHEY Planned $2,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,200,000 Yes ELEMENTARY Cost: Student Stations: 144 0 0 0 0 1.44 Total Classrooms: 8 0 0 0 . 0 8 Gross Sq Ft: 10,672 0 0 0 0 10,672 Classroom Wing ZEPHYRHILLS Planned $2,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,200,000 Yes SENIOR HIGH Cost: Student Stations: 200 0 0 0 0 200 Total Classrooms: 8 0 0 0 0 8 Gross Sq Ft: 13,000 0 0 0 0 13,000 li High School EE Location not Planned $2,000,000 $14,500,000 $30,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 $56,500,000 Yes specified Cost: Page 10 of 29 - 9/27/2007 4: '1:06 PM OR BK 7970 PG 737 34 of 114 PASCO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT { 2007 2008 Wok Plan Student Stations: 0 0 1,909 0 0 1,909 Total Classrooms: 0 0 76 0 0 76 Gross Sq Ft: 0 0 282,999 .0 0 282,999 Classroom Wing PASCO SENIOR Planned $0 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $3,000,000 No HIGH Cost: Student Stations: 0 0 200 0 .0 200 Total Classrooms: 0 0 . 8 0 0 8 Gross Sq Ft: 0 0 13,000 0 0 13,000 High School GG3 Location not Planned $0 $0 $0 $20,605,037 $37,259,000 $57,864,037 Yes specified Cost: Student Stations: 0 0 0 . 0 1,909 1,909 Total.Classrooms: 0 { ,0 0 0 76 76 Gross Sq Ft: 0 0 0 0 282,999 282,999 Planned Cost: $51,600,000 $14,500,000 $33,000,000 $30,605,037 $37,259,000 $166,964,037 Student Stations: 2,012 0 2,109 0 1,909 6,030 Total Classrooms: . 104 0 84 0 76 264. Gross Sq Ft: 260,150 0 295,999 0 282,999 839,148 Other Proje t Schedules I • Major renovations remodeling,and additions of capital outlay projects that do not add (capacity to schools. ., gyp,. -f110. , D 1 2011 2012 � vital" ,Funded r k Project Description Location 2007-2008 2008 20t}9 t)b9 201 :rtes 1�ctual BudgetProjected Projected Projected giProjected � ,�n ��.,� � � ��.�� ` l � �. Addition and Renovation Phase ADMINISTRATION $0 $2,133,005 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $7,133,00 No 2 BUILDING Site Acquistionsl Phase 2 Location not specified $0 $7,500,000 $7,500,000 $0 $0 $15,000,00d No I i Phase 2 SANDERS MEMORIAL .$0 $0 $12,166,077 $0 $0 $12,166,077 No ELEMENTARY Elementary Sc lool O-Design Location not specified $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000 $10,000,00 No Modernization nd PASCO MIDDLE $0 $5,000000 .$0 $0 $0 $5,000,00 No Replacement, Modernization nd PASCO SENIOR HIGH $0 $5,000;000 I ' $0 . $0 $0 $5,000,00 No Replacement Modernization 4nd SANDERS MEMORIAL $5,000,000 $5,000000 $1,833,923 $0 $0 $11,833,92 Yes Replacement ELEMENTARY Addition and R novation ADMINISTRATION $5,000,000 $2,866995 $0 $0 $0 $7,866,99 Yes BUILDING • TeIecommunic4tion Building ADMINISTRATION $5,000,000 $0 $0 ' $0 $0 $5,000,00 Yes BUILDING . I - Page 11 of 29 9/27/2007 :21:06 PM • I � OR BK 7970 PG 788 35 of 114 PASCO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2007-2008 Wok Plan t I ite Acquistions or 4 High Location not specified $20;527,600 �$0 $0 $0 $0 $20,527,600 Yes chools,7 Elementary Schools, Middle School,and Bus arage $35,527,600 $27,500,000 $26,500,000 $0 $10,000,000 $99,527,600 Additional P oject Schedules Any projects tha are not identified in the last approved educational plant survey. Nothing repo od for this section. Non Funded)Growth Management Project Schedules Schedule indicating which projects,due to planned development,that CANNOT be funded from current revenues.projected over the next five years. -' :nt�esnptron g •:m f ,� c'+ r E d Proecc X2007 08 2008 2009 '2009 209t3 200 2093 2019' 2012 Totals Funded l Agtrrat Budget Projected Projected Projected ProfaIted ._ Elementary School Q $0 $0 $12,000,000 $11,500,000 $0 $23,500,000 No Middle School H $0 $0 $25,000,000 $25,000,000 $0 $50,000,000 No $0 $0 $37,000,000 $36,500,000 $0 $73,500,000 � I I " I l__ ___ ___ Page 12 of 29 9/27/2007 :21:06 PM OR BK 7970 PG 789 36 of 114 PASCO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2007-2008W rk Plan Trackin apacity Tracking Location 2007 Actual Actual a #Class Actual ,rx Actual New: New h Projected Projected a FProjected 2008 Safes 2007 2006 Rooms Average, 2007 .� Stu. `FRooms to 2011 2011 St 20113 '43 3 u.Sta. FISH'{ 2007 E 'R3 EER �c'E nN 2 �+',,3 �C 2 t 20t}7 X008 Capacity 2�t12 2Q1201 Class Capacity E COFTE 2008 Class Utilization Added/Re COFTE ti Utilization, Size Size" € ( moved SAN ANTONIO 669 669 689 36 19 103.00% 144 8 717 88.00% 16 ELEMENTARY GULF MIDDLE 1,493 1,344 949 66 1 71.00% 0 0 1,258 94.00% 19 RICHEY ELEMENTARY 684 684 645 36 18 94.00% 0 0 661 97.00% 18 HUDSON ELEt ENTARY 767 767 829 41 20 108.00% 66 3 830 100.00% 19 I I LACOOCHEE 633 633 400 34 12 63.00% -54 -3 402 69.00% 13 ELEMENTARY GULF HIGH 1,780 1,691 1,657 71 23 98.00% -100 -4 1,555 98.00% 23 SCHRADER 772 772 558 42 13 72.00% 0 0 560 73.00% 13 ELEMENTARY BAYONET POINT 1,006 905 986 44 '22 109.00% 110 5 1,009 99.00% 21 MIDDLE FOX HOLLOW 780 780 697 43 16 89.00% -22 -1 723 95.00% 17 LEMENTARY UAIL HOLLOW 735 735 827 27 31 112.00% -150 -7 573 98.00% 29 LEMENTARYI ENTENNIAL 677 677 709 36 20 105.00% 66 3 729 98.00% 19 LEMENTARY SEVEN SPRINGS 665 665 698 36 " 19 105.00% 110 5 786 101.00% 19 ELEMENTARY DEER PARK 640 640 644 34 19 101.00% 132 6 780 101.00% 20 ELEMENTARY i MARY GIELLA 652 652 607 34 _ 18 93.00% -18 -1 607 96.00% 18 ELEMENTARY THOMAS E WEIGHTMAN 1,460 1,314 1,425 62 23 108.00% 352 16 1,674 100.00% 21 MIDDLE RIVER RIDGE MIDDLE• 3,597 3,237 3,387 150 23 105.00% -275 -11 2,811 95.00% 20 SENIOR HIGH. NORTHWEST 774 774 690 25 28 89.00% -18 -1 649 86.00% 27 ELEMENTARY SAND PINE 1,039 1,039 1,035 57 18 100.00% 0 0 997 96.00% 17 ELEMENTARY i. . JAMES IRVIN 425 425 106 17 6 25.00% 0 0 116 27.00% . 7 EDUCATION CENTER WESLEY CHAPEL 1,873 1,779 1,786 73 24 100.00% 538 22 2,325 100.00% 24 SENIOR HIGH J W MITCHELL SENIOR 2,665 2,532 2,400 106 23 95.00% -625 25 1,804 95.00% 14 HIGH i JAMES M MAR OWE 616 616 633 32 26 103.00% 18 1 624 98.00% 19 ELEMENTARY HASCO ELEMENTARY 714 714 650 37 18 91.00% 0 0 689 96.00% 19. 1page 13 of 299/27/2007 4:21:06 PM OR BK 7970 pO 79 37 of 114 PASCO COt NT'(SCHOOL DISTRICT 2007-2008 Wo K Plan UNRAY ELEM NTARY 848 848 856 44 19 101 AO% -180 -10 626 94.00% 18 ENTENNIAL MIDDLE 706 635 653 30 22 103.00% 88 4 706 98.00% 21 HASCO MIDDI.E 1,008 907 889 44 26 98.00% 88 4 998 100.00% 21 RINITY ELEME�}NTARY 1,053 1,053 921 56 16 87.00% -242 -11 809 100.00% ' 18 PINE VIEW 678 678 722 35 21 " 106.00% 264 12 949 101.00% 20 ELEMENTARY GULF HIGHLAN S .. 762 762 605 40 15 79.00% 0 0 661 87.00% 17 ELEMENTARY DR JOHN LONd MIDDLE 1,430 1,287 1,264 62 20 98.00% 660 30 ' 2,008 " 103.00% ' 22 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 750 . 0 0 40 0 0.00% 0 0 922 0.00% 23 P MIDDLE SCHOOL FF 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 1,306 63 692 53.00% 11 TRINITY OAKS 834 _ 834 281 43 7 34.00% 0 0 709 85.00% 16 ELEMENTARY " OAKSTEAD ` 832 832 725 43 17 87.00% 330 15 1,162 100.00% 20 ELEMENTARY NEW RIVER " 772 0 0 41 0 0.00% 772 0 702 91.00% 17 ELEMENTARY LONGLEAF 728 728 807 39 21 111.00% 286 13 1,015 100.00% 20 ELEMENTARY SEVEN OAKS I 908 908 1,049 .49 21 115.00% 462 21 1,342 98.00% 19 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL WIREGRASS RANCH 1,854 1,761 360 73 5 20.00% 0 0 1,415 80.00% 19 SENIOR HIGH AUL R SMITH(MIDDLE 1,430 1,287 916 62 15 71.00% 0 0 1,111 86.00% 18 EPHYRHILLS ENIOR 1,453 1,308 1,583 ` 58 27 121.00% 494 20 1,807 100.00% 23 IGH OODLAND 830 830 929 44 21 112.00% 154 7 981 .100.00% 19 LEMENTARY SANDERS ME ORIAL 748 748 728 40 18 97.00% 0 0 640 86.00% 16 ELEMENTARY MITTYE P LOCKE 850 850 873 46 19 103.00% -126 -7 583 81.00% 15 ELEMENTARY HARRY SCHW TTMAN 273 273 109 20 5 40.00% 0 0 122 45.00% 6 EDUCATION C�NTER I. - DOUBLE BRAN H 772 0 0 41 • 0 0.00% 982 10 987 101:00% 19 ELEMENTARY CHARLES S.Rh1SHE 1,562 0 0 71 6 0.00% 1,516 4 1,504 99.00% 20 MIDDLE - SUNLAKE HIGH .1,868 0 0 77 0 0.00% 1,806 0 1,665 92.00% 22 GULF TRACE 28 0 0 2 0 0.00% 734 38 749 102.00% 19 ELEMENTARY WESLEY CHAPEL 1,026 , 1,026 1,367 54 25 133.00% 0 0 780 76.00% 14 ELEMENTARY RODNEY B CO 524 524 456 28 16 87.00% 0 0 478 91.00% 17 ELEMENTARY PASCO SENIO HIGH 1,200 1,020 1,265 52 2 124.00% 425 17 1,493 103.00% 22 PASCO ELEM NTARY 769 769 675 40 17 88.00% -54 -3 701 98.00% 19 I ASCO MIDDL� 843 759 756 38 2I 100.00% 0 0 759 100.00% 20 RILBYADUL1I - 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0. 0.00% 0 DUCATION CENTER Page 14 of 29 9/27/2007421:06 PM OR BK 7970 PG 791 38 of 114 PASCO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT j 2007-2008 Work Plan MOORE-MICKDNS 551 551 189 30 6 34.00% 0 0 154 28.00% 5 EDUCATION CENTER WEST ZEPHYIRHILLS 864 864 887 46 19 103.00% 22 1 882 100.00% 19 ELEMENTARY RAYMOND B STEWART 1,557 1,401 1,003 66 15 72.00% -286 -13 1,007 90.00% 19 MIDDLE HUDSON SENIOR HIGH 1,790 1,701 1,592 68 23 94.00% -100 -4 1,272 79.00% 20 SHADY HILLS 509 509 584 28 21 115.00% 88 4 573 96.00% 18 ELEMENTARY CYPRESS ELEMENTARY 532 532 871 16 54 164.00% 496 22 1,032 100.00% 27 LAND 0 LAKE SENIOR 1,985 1,886 2,484 80 31 132.00% -125 -5 1,754 100.00% 23 HIGH ANCLOTE ELEMENTARY 543 543 569 15 38 105.00% 66 3 615 101.00% 34 GULFSIDE 634 634 633 31 20 100.00% 0 0 528 83.00% 17 ELEMENTARY PINE VIEW MIDDLE 1,777 1,599 1,872 75 25 117.00% -374 -17 1,199 98.00% 21 RIDGEWOOD SENIOR 2,010 1,910 1,828 79 23 96.00% -425 -17 1,224 82.00% 20 HIGH CALUSA ELEMENTARY 729 729 678 38 18 93.00% 0 0 707 97.00% 19 MOON LAKE 656 656 614 34 1,8 94.00% 36 2 675 98.00% 19 ELEMENTARY HUDSON MIDDLE 1,428 1,285 1,196 60 20 93.00% -220 -10 1,060 100.00% 21 LAKE MYRTLE 880 880 821 48 17 93.00% 180 10 1,066 101.00% 18 ELEMENTARY VFREDARC MAN 735 735 449 40 11 61.00% 0 0 129 18.00% 3 AL ONA CENTER PRINS 1,499 1,349 1,306 65 20 97.00% 44 2 1,422 102.00% 21 COTEE RIVER 784 784 779 43 18 99.00% 0 0 783 100.00% 18 ELEMENTARY DENHAM OAKS 856 856 875 47 19 102.00% 254 13 1,102 99.00% 18 li ELEMENTARYI CHESTER W TAYLOR JR 746 746 834 39 2,1 112.00% -56 -3 690 10000% 19 ELEMENTARYI I 73,520 64,821 61,856 3,399 18 95.43% 9,639 281 69,829 93.78% 19 The COFTE Projected Total(69,829)for 2011 -2012 must match the Official Forecasted COFTE Total (72,861 )for 2011 -2012 before this section can be completed.In the event that the COFTE Projected Total does not r atch the Official forecasted COFTE,then the Balanced Projected COFTE Table should be used o balance COFTE. Profectetl GOF7 E for 2011 2012 Grade Level Type Balanced Proaectedfr OETE for 21 1 2012 Elementary(PK-3) 23,981 OE` I A High(9-12) 20,394 Elementary(PK-3) 753 Middle(4-8) 28,486 Middle(4-8) 579 72,861 High(9-12) 1,700 72,861 Page 15 of 29 9/27/2007 4:21:06 PM OR 13K 7971 pG 792 i 39 of 114 PASCO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2007 -2008 Work Plan G . elocatable R eplacement umber of relocatable classrooms clearly identified and scheduled for replacement in the school board adopted financially feasible 5-year district work pr gram. Location ,1 2007-2008 2008 2009 2009 2010 X010 2011 2011`E 2012 Year 5 Total Total Relocatable Replacements: 0 0 0 0 0 0 r, I Charter Schools Tracking Information regarding the use of charter schools i ction-Type ft Relocatable Owner year Stalrted or Student $tydents Years m Total Chaffer �, units oil y Scheduled Stations k Enrnited Contract Studen#s permanent pro eotedfor classrooms 1 2011-2012. Day Spring,Port Richey,K-8 31 PRIVATE 2000 450 410 10 550 Academy at the F arm,Dade City, 12 PRIVATE 2002 280 262 10 500 K-8 Contryside Montessori,Land 0' 12 PRIVATE 2002 185 150 5 250 Lakes,1-6 1 Athenian AcaderIy,New Port 17 PRIVATE 2006 268 234 3 600 Richey,K-6 72 1,183 1,056 1,900 pecial Purpose Classrooms Tracking he number of classrooms that will be used for certain special purposes in the current year,by facility and type of classroom,that the district will,1),not use for ducat€onal purposes and 2),the co-teaching classrooms that are not open plan classrooms and will be used for educational purposes. School ; School°Type` #of Elementary #/of Middle 4-8;' #of High 9-12 #of ESE #of Combo. Tn1at ^`i .W ✓ Y : K3 Classrooms Classrooms Classrooms Classrooms Classrooms Classrooms Total Educational Classrooms: 0 0 0 0 0 0 School SchogType #of Elementary #of Middle 4-8 #"of High 912 ' #of ESE, #of obo ' Tnta4 ' ! K3 Clasroonts Classrooms Classrooms ' Clasrooms Classrooms C)assrooms 1 . .._t... LONGLEAF ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 1 4 0 0 0 5 WIREGRASS R4,NCH SENIOR Co-Teaching 0 0 20 0 0 20 HIGH PAUL R SMITH MIDDLE Co-Teaching 0 12 0 0 0 12 ZEPHYRHILLS SENIOR HIGH Co-Teaching 0 0 18 0 0 18 it I WESLEY CHAPEL SENIOR HIGH Co-Teaching 0 1 0 6 0 0 6 J W MITCHELL SENIOR HIGH Co-Teaching 0 0 29 0 0 29 JAMES M MARLOWE Co-Teaching 2 4 0 0 0 6 ELEMENTARYI CHASCO ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 0 1 0 0 0 1 CENTENNIAL MIDDLE Co-Teaching 0 12 0 0 0 12 CHASCO MIDDLE Co-Teaching 0 21 0 0 0 21 Page 16 of 29 9/27/2007 :21:06 PM ' I OR BK 7970 Pc 79 40 of 114 PASCO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2007•-2008 Wor Plan f NITY ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 1 13 0 0 0 4 E VIEW ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 0 1 0 0 0 1 F HIGHLANDS ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 2 5 0 0 .. 0 7 R JOHN LONG MIDDLE Co-Teaching 0 14 0 0 0 14 OAKSTEAD ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 4 18 0 0 0 12 CHARLES S.RUSHE MIDDLE Co-Teaching . : 0 22 0 0 0 22 SUNLAKE HIGH Co-Teaching 0 10 26 0 0 26 LAKE MYRTLE ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 8 16 0 0 0 24 SEVEN SPRING SI MIDDLE Co-Teaching 0 21 0 0 0 21 COTEE RIVER ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching• 4 10 0 0 0 14 DENHAM OAKS ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 2 8 0 0 0 10 CHESTER W TA' LOR JR Co-Teaching 2 1 7 0 0 0 9 I ELEMENTARY WESLEY CHAPEL.ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 7 14 • 0 0 0 21 RODNEY B COX ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 PASCO SENIOR HIGH Co-Teaching 0 1 0 22 0 0 22 PASCO ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 1 2 0 0 0 3 PASCO MIDDLE Co-Teaching 0 14 0 .0 0 14 EST ZEPHYRHILLS Co-Teaching 2 1 4 0 0 0 6 LEMENTARY YMOND B.STEWART MIDDLE Co-Teaching 0 . 14 0 0 0 14 UDSON SENIOR HIGH Co-Teaching 0 0 28 0 0 28 �• HADY HILLS ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 1 12 0 0 0 3 CYPRESS ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 1 4 0 0 0 5 LAND O LAKES SENIOR HIGH Co-Teaching 0 0 14 0 0 14 ANCLOTE ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching - 1 2 0 0 0 3 GULFSIDE ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 1 1 0 0 0 2 PINE VIEW MIDDLE Co-Teaching 0 20 0 . 0 0 20 RIDGEWOOD SENIOR HIGH Co-Teaching 0 10 17 0 0 17 CALUSA ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 3 7 0 0 0 10 HUDSON MIDDLE Co-Teaching .0 36 0 0 0 36 HARRY SCHWETTMAN Co-Teaching 0 4 4 0 0 8 EDUCATION CENTER SAN ANTONIO ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 2 4 0 0 0 6 GULF MIDDLE Co-Teaching 0 24 0 0 0 - . 24 HUDSON ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 5 110 0 0 0 15 ULF HIGH Co Teaching 0 0 17 0 0 17 AYONET POINT MIDDLE - Co-Teaching 0 122 0 0 0 22 Page 17 of 29 9/27/2007 4 1:06 PM II II it OR BK 7970 PG 794 41 of 114 l _ PASCO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2007-2008 Work Plan II II � UAIL HOLLOW ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 1 1 0 0 0 2 ENTENNIAL ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 1 1 2 0 0 0 3 EVEN SPRINGS ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 1 4 0 0 0 5 ARY GIELLA ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 6 11 0 0 0 17 THOMAS E WEIGHTMAN MIDDLE Co-Teaching 0 18 0 0 0 18 RIVER RIDGE MIDDLE SENIOR Co-Teaching 0 39 26 0 0 65 HIGH NORTHWEST ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 2 1 4 0 0 0 6 SAND PINE ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 2 4 0 0 0 6 Total Co-Teaching Classrooms: 64 437 227 0 0 728 Infrastructure Tracking Necessary offsite infrastructure requirements resulting from expansions or new schools.This section should include infrastructure informati n related to capacity project schedules and other project schedules(Section 4). 1 - High School"FFF"-extension of Sweetbriar Drive. Lighted intersection at Sweetbriar Drive and Anclote Boulevard. Utility Improvements. High School"EEE"-construction of Cricket Street. Modifications and light at intersection of Cricket Street and Little Road. Turn lane modifications on S ate Road 52. Modifications to the intersection of State Road 52 and Chicago Avenue. Utility Improvements. Middle School" H"and High School"GGG"-turn lanes and road improvements to Old Pasco Road.Utility Improvements. Proposed location of planned facilities,whether those locations are consistent with the comprehensive plans of all affected local government ,and ecommendatiois for infrastructure and other improvements to land adjacent to existing facilities.Provisions of 1013.33(12),(13)and(14)and 1013.36 ust be addressed for new facilities planned within the 1st three years of the plan(Section 5). lementary School P(Veterans Elementary)-Wesley Chapel Area on Wesley Chapel Boulevard. iddle School FF(Crews Lake Middle)-Shady Hills Area on Shady Hills Road. lementary School R-Land O'Lakes Area in the Connerton Development. Elementary School V-Wesley Chapel Area in the Watergrass Development. High School FFF-Holiday Area on Sweetbriar Drive. High School EEE-Hudson Area at State Road 52 and Chicago Avenue. Elementary School X-Land O'Lakes Area in the Bexley Ranch Development. Middle School H-1-Wesley Chapel Area on Old Pasco Road. High School GGG-Wesley Chapel Area on Old Pasco Road. Consistent with Comp Plan? Yes I I � I Net New Classrooms The number of classrooms,by grade level and type of construction,that were added during the last fiscal year. I List the net new classrooms added in the 2006-07 fiscal year. List the net new classrooms to be added,in the 2007-08 fisc I year. "Classrooms"is defined as capacity carrying classrooms that are added to increase Totals for fiscal year 2007-08 should match totals in Section Ii 5A. capacity to enab a the district to meet the Class Size Amendment. locaion 2006*t 007#).. 2005 2007 2006 2 007...''200 2008 2007 208 20117 200 '% 2P0 2Q08= . 007f I2A06 2 $ Pe n13[1Pl t MQdU dr Rekcatable h Total Permanent Meddler RelpaIb$ Elementary(PK-3) 152 0 0 152 96 0 0 96 iddle(4-8) 126 0 0 126 0 0 0 0 j I Page 18 of 29 9/27/2007 4: 1:06 PM I f OR BK 7970 PG 795 42 of 114 PASCO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2007-2008 Work Plan High(9-12) 152 0 0 ,152 84 0 0 84 430 0 0 430 180 0 0 180 Relocatable Student Stations Number of students that will be educated in relocatable units,by school,in the current year,and the projected number of students for each of the years In the workplan. Site� } 2007008 J2008 2D09 200C2Yf 2016 2011 2011 ,2012 5 YeaF 1Sverage LONGLEAF ELEMENTARY 54 164 220 286 330 211 SEVEN OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 234 220 392 528 682 411 WIREGRASS RANCH SENIOR HIGH. 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 PAUL R SMITHII MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 0 0 ZEPHYRHILLS SENIOR HIGH 250 300 325 375 400 330 Ij WOODLAND ELEMENTARY 160 264 286 308 330 270 SANDERS MEMORIAL ELEMENTARY 108 308 0 0 66 96 MITTYE P LOC<E ELEMENTARY 126 0 0 0 0 25 HARRY SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER 100 25 25 25 25 40 SAN ANTONIO ELEMENTARY 72 0 0 0 0 14 GULF MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 0 0 RICHEY ELEMENTARY 126 0 0 0 0 25 HUDSON ELEMENTARY 216 216 216 216 216 216 ACOOCHEE ELEMENTARY 0 54 0 0 0 0 11 GULF HIGH 75 100 0 0 0 35 CREWS LAKE MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRINITY OAKS ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 •0 0 . 0 OAKSTEAD ELEMENTARY 0 176 242 330 0 150 NEW.RIVER ELEMENTARY 0 .0 0 0 0 0 DOUBLE BRANCH ELEMENTARY 0 0 22 132 220 75 CHARLES S.RIJSHE MIDDLE 0 I 0 0 44 198 48 SUNLAKE HIG, 0 ; 0 0 0 0 0 GULF TRACE ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 0 0 WESLEY CHAPEL ELEMENTARY 408 528 0 132 286 271 RODNEY B COX ELEMENTARY 18 0 0 0 0 4 PASCO SENIOR HIGH 75 300 300 200 200 215 PASCO ELEMENTARY 54 10 0 0 0 11 ASCO MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 0 0 RILBYADULT EDUCATION CENTER 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 age 19 of 29 9/27/2007 4: 1:06 PM I ! OR BK 7970 PG 76 43 of ll4 PASCO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2007-2008 WcJrk Plan MOORE-MICKENS EDUCATION CENTER 36 36 36 •36 36 36 I WEST ZEPHYRIHILLS ELEMENTARY 90 1 90 90 110 110 98 RAYMOND B STEWART MIDDLE 330 0 0 0 0 66 UDSON SENIOR HIGH 100 . 100 100 0 0 60 SHADY HILLS ELEMENTARY 72 ;72 72 72 72 72 CYPRESS ELEMENTARY 108 X418 418 462 462 374 LAND O LAKES(SENIOR HIGH 450 250 250 250 250 290 II ANCLOTE ELEMENTARY 54 54 54 54 54 54 GULFSIDE ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 0 0 II I PINE VIEW MIDDLE 462 0 0 0 0 92 RIDGEWOOD SENIOR HIGH 625 400 425 0 0 290 { CALUSA ELEMENTARY 72 72 72 72 72 72 MOON LAKE ELI EMENTARY 18 1 66 66 66 66 56 HUDSON MIDDLE 242 0 0 0 0 48 LAKE MYRTLE ELEMENTARY 126 126 176 220 308 191 FRED K MARCHMAN TECHNICAL EDUCATIONAL 54 54 54 54 54 54 CENTER SEVEN SPRINGS MIDDLE 44 i 44 66 66 66 57 COTEE RIVER ELEMENTARY 18 22 22 22 22 21 ENHAM OAKS ELEMENTARY 162 144 110 176 264 151 HESTER W TAYLOR JR ELEMENTARY 210 132 132 154 154 156 CHRADER ELEMENTARY 36 0 0 0 0 7 BAYONET POINT MIDDLE 22 122 22 22 22 22 FOX HOLLOW ELEMENTARY 198 0 0 0 0 40 QUAIL HOLLOW ELEMENTARY 270 0 0 0 0 54 CENTENNIAL ELEMENTARY 18 1 40 62 84 84 58 SEVEN SPRINGS ELEMENTARY 36 . �36 66 110 110 72 DEER PARK ELEMENTARY 40 140 88 132 176 95 MARY GIELLA ELEMENTARY 18 0 0 0 0 4 THOMAS E WEtGHTMAN MIDDLE 377 399 462 550 0 358 RIVER RIDGE<v1IDDLE SENIOR HIGH 417 417 0 0 0 167 II NORTHWEST ELEMENTARY 54 36 36 36 36 . 40 SAND PINE ELEMENTARY 504 .220 264 374 462 365 JAMES IRVIN EI UCATION CENTER 425 116 116 116 116 178 WESLEY CHAPEL SENIOR HIGH 275 225 300 500 600 380 I i I W MITCHELL ENIOR HIGH 625 . 625 0 0 0 250 age 20 of 29 9/27/2007 4:P1:06 PM OR BK 7970 PG 797 44 of 114 PASCO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2007-2008 Wok Plan JAMES M MARLOWE ELEMENTARY 0 18 18 18 18 14 ii ,HASCO ELEMENTARY 90 i90 90 90 90 90 UNRAY ELEMENTARY 180 0 0 0 0 36 ENTENNIAL MIDDLE 22 66 88 88 88 70 HAS CO MIDDLE 66 88 110 132 132 106 TRINITY ELEMENTARY 432 144 110 134 156 175 PINE VIEW ELEMENTARY 54 132 176 264 308 187 GULF HIGHLANDS ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 0 0 DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE 0 352 462 506 198 304 VETERANS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals for PaSCO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTR j � F Total students in relocatables by year. 9,562 7,547 6,641 7,546 7,539 7,767 Total number of COFTE students projected by year. 61,856 63,990 66,510 69,501 72,363 66,844 Percent in relocatables by year. 15% 12% 10% 11 % 10% 12% !� G Leased Faci ities Tracking Exising leased f I cilities and plans for the acquisition of leased facilities,including the number of classrooms and student stations,as reported in the educational lant survey,that are planned in that location at the end of the five year workplan. Location #ofteased FISHkStudent Owner ; ,; #of Leased a FISH Student Classroorns2007 Stations Classrooms 2011 Stations; 2008 lj 2012 I UNRAY ELEMENTARY 1 18 Returned to 0 0 leasing agent Int Middle Class Room 97-681 Private 1 22 Restroom 97-682 Private 1 1 Restroom 97-470 Private 1 1 Restroom 97-684 Private 1 1 Restroom 97-685 Private 1 1 1 18 5 26 Failed Standard Relocatable Tracking Relocatable units currently reported by school,from FISH,and the number of relocatable units identified as Failed Standards'. Page 21 of 29 9/27/2007421 06 PM OR BK 7970 PG 798 45 of 114 PASCO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2007-2008 W rk Plan II Nothing reported for this section. 1 II 1 I � � I II P . I it { 1 III 1 II II C . ! I II i I age 22 of 29 9/27/2007 4 21:06 PM I ' OR BK 7970 PG 799 d , 46 of 114 PASCO COUI TV SCHOOL DISTRICT 2007-2008 Wor Plan Tannin lass Size Reduction Planning ans approved by the school board that reduce the need for permanent student stations such'as acceptable school capacity levels,redistricting, 'I using,year-round schools,charter schools,magnet schools,public-private partnerships,multitrack scheduling,grade level organization,block Ii scheduling,or other alternatives. The District Scholl Board of Pasco County has reduced the need for permanent student stations in our district in the past by approving several charter sc ools. The Board appro�ed the expansion of one high school adding 8 hybrid classrooms and 200 permanent student stations. Students in grades 11 &12 may enroll full time in dual credit college courses on the Pasco-Hernando New Port Richey campus in order to simultaneously meet their graduation requirements a d earn college credits. I � School Closure Planning Plans for the closure of any school,including plans for disposition of the facility or usage of facility space,and anticipated revenues. None of II II f li f f i age 23 of 29 9/27/2007 4 1:06 PM ' I • OR BK f 9 1 O PG 800 47 of 114 PASCO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2007-2008 Wo k Plan on . Range Planning en-Year Maintenance istrict projects and locations regarding the projected need for major renovation,repair,and maintenance projects within the district in years 6-10 beyon the rojects plans del ailed in the five years covered by the work plan. Project E 2011.- 2)X01'6 2Q1�' ProtectedCost Er.. '%.�.,v6 E R.c�. �.tiF.... ,, d'4'...'. IE'�a`�Md.T. e34i'✓ _ .e� T _ HVAC $34,000,000 FLOORING $2,000,000 ROOFING $8,000,000 LIFE TO SAFETY $300,000 PARKING $5,500,000 II ELECTRICAL $1,600,000 FIRE ALARM $1,700,000 PAINT $4,000,000 ATHLETIC IMPROVEMENTS $2,500,000 CABINETRY&MILLWORK $850,000 I I FOOD&NUTRITION $4,200,000 ASONRY $250,000 ANDSCAPE $600,000 w i LUMBING $2,750,000 ORTABLE RELOCATIONS $5,500,000 COVERED WALKWAYS $2,900,000 REMODELING $11,000,000 RENOVATIONS $5,500,000 � I PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE • $3,000,000 WINDOW&DOOR REPLACEMENTS $2,700,000 WATER SEWER&PONDS $400,000 VOCATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS $2,000,000 $101,250,000 Ten-Year Capacity Schedule of cap tal outlay projects projected to ensure the availability of satisfactory student stations for the projected student enrollment in K-12 progra is for the future 5 years beyond the 5-year district facilities work program. Page 24 of 29 9/27/2007 4 21:06 PM OR BK 7970 PG 81 48 of 114 PASCO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2007-2008 Work Plan � ` E �y Protect g � ,Y� Location�CommunQuadrant or other ,. `2017 20� 212016 2017 a+q� r ' general location .t, ES 4 Pr�tected Cost Elementary O Hudson Area $21,500,000 Elementary S Odessa Area j $21,500,000 Elementary T North Zephyrhills Area $21,500,000 Elementary U Wesley Chapel Area $22,000,000 Elementary W Wesley Chapel Wiregrass Ranch $22,000,000 Elementary Y Odessa.Starkey Ranch $24,000,000 Elementary Z North Wesley Chapel Curley Road $22,000,000 Elementary A North Land O'Lakes Hwy 41 Corridor $22,000,000 Elementary B Wesley Chapel Chancey Road $22,000,000 Elementary C Wesley Chapel Wiregrass Ranch $24,000,000 Middle GG North Land O'Lakes Connerton $50,000,000 iugh GGG Wesley Chapel Old Pasco Road $40,000,000 $312,500,000 Ten-Year Planned Utilization Schedule of planned capital outlay projects identifying the standard grade groupings,capacities,and planned utilization rates of future educational facilit es of the district for both permanent and relocatable facilities. Grade Level Protections FISH E, Actbal 2006 Actual ActU12006 2007+Actual 2007 2008/2016 2017 nw Projected 2016 Prone„ed 2016 rStu lent 2007 FiSH 2006 f Utilization Student Capacity to be added/removed 2017 COFITE 201T1JLI zation Star+ s Capacity � P ty 2007 COFTE Elementary-Di strict 29,940 29,940 29,446.76 98.35% 12,912 41,681 97.27% Totals Middle-District Totals 14,397 12,956 11,788.71 90.99% ! 5,224 21,440 117.93% High-District Totals 21,736 20,201 19,768.08 97.86% 7,856 23,920 85.26% Other-ESE,etc 7,811 1,984 852.64 42.99% 0 921 46.42% 73,884 65,081 61,856.19 95.04% j 25,992 87,962 96.58% en-Year Infrastructure Planning age 25 of 29 9/27/2007 4:21:06 PM OR BK 7970 PG 802 49 of 114 PASCO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2007 -2008 Work Plan Proposed Location of Planned New,Remodeled,or New Additions to Facilities in 11 thru 20 out years(Section 28). ew Elementary School"O"located in the Northwest portion of the county to accomodate growth. ew Elementary School"S"located in the vicinity of the town of Odessa to accomodatell growth. ew Elementary School"T"located just north of the City of Zephyrhills in the vicinity of Otis Allen Road to accomodate growth. ew Elementary School"U"located in the Northwood subdivision in the area of WesleyChapel to accomodate growth. ew Elementary School"W"located in the Wiregrass subdivision in the area of Wesley Chapel to accomodate growth. ew Elementary,School"Z"located in the Epperson Ranch subdivision in the area of Wesley Chapel to accomodate growth. ew Elementary,School"A"located in the northern section of Land O'Lakes along the US Highway 41 corridor to accomodate growth. Ij New Elementary,School"B"located in the Wyndfields subdivision in the area of Wesley Chapel to accomodate growth. New Elementary,School"Y"located in the Starkey Ranch subdivision in the area of the town of Odessa to accomodate growth. New Elementary,School"C"located in the Wiregrass subdivision in the area of Wesley Chapel to accomodate growth. New Middle School"GG"located in the Connerton subdivision in the area of Land O'Lakes to accomodate growth. i Plans for closure of any school,including plans for disposition of the facility or ulsage of facility space,and anticipated revenues in the 11 thr 20 out years(Section 29). None. Twenty-Year Maintenance District projects and locations regarding the projected need for major renovation,repair;and maintenance projects within the district in years 11-20 beyo d the projects plans detailed in the five years covered by the work plan. Prote 201fi 2t31Tt2026 2027 Projected • ct a a HVAC $74,000,000 FLOORING $4,800,000 OOFING $j18,000,000 AFETY TO LIFE $600,000 ENCING $600,000 ARKING $12,000,000 ELECTRICAL ($3,500,000 FIRE ALARMS $3,500,000 PAINT $7,800,000 ATHLETIC IMPROVEMENTS $4,800,000 CABINETRY&MILLWORK $1,800,000 FOOD&NUTRICIAN ;$9,000,000 MASONRY $600,000 LANDSCAPE 1$1,200,000 PLUMBING • x$6,000,000 PORTABLE RELOCATIONS $12,000,000 COVERED SID WALKS 1$6,200,000 REMODELING $24,000,000 RENOVATIONS $12,000,000 PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE $6,700,000 Page 26 of 29 9/27/2007 4:21:06 PM OR BK 7970 PG 3 50 of 114 PASCO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2007-2008 Work Plan I I , '! WINDOW&DOOR REPLACEMENTS $6,000,000 I` ATER,SEWER&PONDS $850,000 'I OCATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS $4,300,000 $220,250,000 Twenty-Yea Capacity Schedule of capital outlay projects projected to ensure the availability of satisfactory student stations for the projected student enrollment in K-12 progra s for the future 11-20 years beyond the 5-year district facilities work program. Protect f E Lac tton Community Quadrant or other 2036 20i7/2025 2027 � generat iodation Proacted Cost 1 3t i + �` h ' v.__.,:�`.,.� � ..a._ ₹-§��'_ ' _7„���d,< 3 .+..�C.eC3{3.•:,v._ .�`§x� 1,� av L .�. '��� .l'o,.. Elementary School"X" Area 3-West $32,000,000 Elementary School"D" Area 5-Starkey Ranch ! $32,000,000 Elementary School"E" Area 6-Co'nnerton $32,000,000 Elementary School"F" Area 7-Wesley Chapel $32,000,000 Middle School" J" Area 1 -Starkey Ranch $74,000,000 Middle School"IM" Area 3-Wesley Chapel j $74,000,000 lementary School"G" Area 6-Bexley Ranch $34,000,000 Elementary School"H" Area 7-Wesley Chapel $34,000,000 Middle School"KK" Area 3-Wesley Chapel $77,000,000 High School"HHH" Area 2-Shady Hills $92,000,000 Elementary School"I" Area 6-Land 0 Lakes $34,000,000 Elementary School"J" Area 7-Wesley Chapel $34,000,000 Middle School"LL" Area 3-Wesley Chapel $79,000,000 High School"III' Area 4-Two Rivers $94,000,000• Elementary School"K" Area 7-Wesley Chapel $35,000,000 Elementary School"L" Area 5-Trinity $35,000,000 lementary School"M" Area 6-Land 0'Lakes $35,000,000 • age 27 of 29 9/27/2007 4 21:06 PM OR BK 7970 PG 1U4 51 of 114 V _ . PASCO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2007-2008 W rk Plan 'I I Elementary School"N" Area 7-Wesley Chapel $35,000;000 Elementary School"10" Area 7-Wesley Chapel $36,000,000 Middle School"MM" Area 3-Wesley Chapel $83,000,000 Elementary School"1 P" Area 6-Land 0'Lakes $37,000,000 Elementary Schlool"10" Area 7-Wesley Chapel $37,000,000 Elementary School"1 R" Area 3-West Pasco 1 $38,000,000 Elementary School"1S" Area 5-Trinity $38,000,000 If Middle School"NN" Area 1 -West Pasco $87,000,000 Middle School"00" Area 3-Wesley Chapel $89,000,000 High School"LLL" Area 3.-Wesley Chapel $106,000,000 Middle School"PP" Area 3-Wesley Chapel $89,000,000 14 $1,534,000,000 Twenty-Year Planned Utilization chedule of planned capital outlay projects identifying the standard grade groupings,capacities,and planned utilization rates of future educational facilit es of the istrict for both permanent and relocatable facilities. Grade Lel Projections FISH,,. Actual 2006 f Actual Actual 2006 2007 Actual 2Q 7 8.:'202 r� a0 200 ./ 6 X027 new Projected 202$ Projected 2026 Student 200 FISH i, 200ti �t L1tII�za�fiOr , � Student Capacity to added/removed 2027�GO��" �20�7�.Iblrzatton Stations FEE eNs°Capacity 2007 P t,3, YF lJ'Iv Z •� kRe k: 1 E b E Y$Yk'1 €`k i, va'4 § GOFT,', x�:�.. Elementary-District 29,940 29,940 29,446.76 98.35% . 23,910 53,728 99.77% Totals ! Middle-District t otals 14,397 12,956 11,788.71 90.99% 15,672 28,305 98.87% High-District Totals 21,736 20,201 19,768.08 97.86% 1 10,884 30,529 98.21 Other-ESE,etcl 7,811 1,984 852.64 42.99% 0 921 46.42 73,884 65,081 61,856.19 95.04% 50,466 113,483 98.21 I I Twenty-Yea Infrastructure Planning ,I I Proposed Location of Planned New,Remodeled,or New Additions to Facilities in 11 thru 20 out years(Section 28). I ' age 28 of 29 9/27/2007 4: 1:06 PM -mot. it OR BK 7970 �PG 5 52 of 114 PASCO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2007-2008 Work Plan New Elementa School"X"located in the west-central section of Pasco County to accomodate growth. New Elementary School"D"located in the Starkey Ranch subdivision near the town of Odessa to accomodate growth. ew Elementary School"E"located in the Connerton subdivision in the Land O'Lakes area to accomodate growth. Vew Elementary School"F"located in the Wesley Chapel area to accomodate growth.i ew Middle School"JJ"located in the Starkey Ranch subdivision in the Odessa area to accomodate growth. ew Middle School"I I"located in the Two Rivers subdivision in the Wesley Chapel area to accomodate growth. ew Elementary School"G"located in the Bexley Ranch subdivision in the Land O'Lakes area to accomodate growth. ew Elementary School"H"located in the Wesley Chapel area to accomodate growth. ew Middle School"KK"located in the Wesley Chapel area to accomodate growth. New High School"HHH"located in the Shady Hills area to accomodate growth. New Elementary School"I"located in the Land O'Lakes area to accomodate growth. New Elementary School"J"located in the Wesley Chapel area to accomodate growth. New Middle School"LL"located in the Wesley Chapel area to accomodate growth. New High School"III"located in the Two Rivers subdivision in the Wesley Chapel area to accomodate growth. New Elementary School"K"located in the Wesley Chapel area to accomodate growth. New Elementary School"L"located in the Trinity area to accomodate growth. New Elementary School"M"located in the Land O'Lakes area to accomodate growth. New Elementary School"N"located in the Wesley Chapel area to accomodate growth. New Elementary)School"1O"located in the Wesley Chapel area to accomodate growth. New Middle School"MM"located in the River Landing subdivision in the Wesley Chapel area to accomodate growth. New Elementary School"1 P"located in the Land O'Lakes area to accomodate growth. New Elementary)School"1Q"located in the Wesley Chapel area to accomodate growth;. New Elementary)School"1 R"located in the west central area of Pasco County to accomodate growth. New Elementary)School"15"located in the Trinity area to accomodate growth. New Middle School"NN"located in the west side of the county to accomodate growth. New Middle School"OO"located in the west side of the county to accomodate growth. New Middle School"PP"located in the Wesley Chapel area to accomodate growth. New High School"LLL"located in the Wesley Chapel area to accomodate growth. • I Plans for closure of any school,including plans for disposition of the facility or usage of facility space,and anticipated revenues in the 11 thr 20 out years(Section 29). None age 29 of 29 9/27/2007 4: 1:06 PM ' I OR BK 7970 PG 806 53 of 114 - Public School Facilities Elemen Adapted: 2OO• City of Zephyrhills.2020 Comprehensive Plan Public School Facilities Element ' OR BK 7970 PG 8 7 ' 54 of 114 [This page intentionally left blank.] 1 City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Public School Facilities Element OR go< 7970 PG 808 55 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 Table of Contents I. Purpose....................:............................. ....................................................:.......PSF-1 II. Existing Conditions ..........................................PSF-1 PopulationTrends..........................................................................................................PSF-1 DevelopmentTrends......................................................................................................PSF-2 School Enrollment Trends.................................................:............................................PSF-3 School Facilities Capacity and Utilization ......... ............................................................PSF-4 III. Demand and Needs Analysis.........................!..........................................................PSF-10 StudentGeneration........................................... ..........................................................PSF-10 Level of Service Standards............................... ..........................:...............................PSF-12 School Concurrency Service Areas .............. .. .. .........................................................PSF-17 . ; Public School Facility Needs........................................................................................PSF-18 Needs Assessment......................................................................................................PSF-20 IV. Other Public School Facilities Planning Issues......................................................PSF-28 Co-location and Shared-Use Analysis.............. ..........................................................PSF-28 Development Opportunity............................................................................................PSF-28 Mutual Use Agreements .........................................................PSF-28 V. Plan to Meet Needs........................................ .........................................................PSF-30 School District Five-Year Tentative Facilities Work Program ......................................PSF-30 School District 10 and 20-Year Plans..........................................................................PSF-32 Revenue Sources ........................................................................................................PSF-35 Interlocal Agreement for School Planning......... ..........................................................PSF-38 DebtService ................................................... ..........................................................PSF-38 Cost Sharing for Infrastructure Needs ..........................PSF-38 VI. Goals, Objectives and Policies............... ... ........ ................................................PSF-41 Introduction..................................................... . .........................................................PSF-41 Implementation ............................................................................................................PSF-41 Level of Service Standards..........................................................................................PSF-41 School Concurrency Review Process ................PSF-43 ......................................................... School Capital Facilities Planning.................................................................................PSF-45 InformationSharing......................................................................................................PSF-46 School Facility Siting and Availability................ ..........................................................PSF-46 CommunityDesign............................................ ..........................................................PSF-49 List of Exhibits Exhibit PSF-1 Schools Included in Student Generation Rate Calculations Exhibit PSF-2 Florida Department of Revenue Property Use Classifications Exhibit PSF-3 Master Appraisal File (MAF) Property Use Classifications Exhibit PSF-4 Deed Restricted Communities in Pasco County Exhibit PSF-5 Elementary School Existing 2000-2005 Growth Rates Exhibit PSF-6 Elementary School Existing 2005-2006 Growth Rates City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-i OR BK 7970 PG 809 li 56 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 E hibit PSF-7 Elementary School Existing 2006-2016 Projected Growth Rates• Exhibit PSF-8 Middle School Existing 2000,-2005 Growth Rates •Exhibit PSF-9 Middle School Existing 2005-2006 Growth Rates Exhibit PSF-10 Middle School Existing 2006-2016 Projected Growth Rates Exhibit PSF-1 1 High School Existing 2000-2005 Growth Rates Exhibit PSF-12 High School Existing 2005-2006 Growth Rates Exhibit PSF-13 High School Existing 2006-2016 Projected Growth Rates Exhibit PSF-14 Resident Student Population Projections Exhibit PSF-1 5 Five-Year Survey Recommendation, FDOE Exhibit PSF-16 Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning L st of Tables T I ble PSF-1 Population Trends and Projections.............................................................PSF-2 Table PSF-2 Housing Distribution by Type......... ............................................................PSF-2 Table PSF-3 Projected Demand for Need for Dwellings, 2000-2010 ..............................PSF-3 Table PSF-4 Enrollment Change by School Type, 2002-2007........................................PSF-3 a g g pacity and Utilization, 2007................'..PSF-4 Table PSF-6 Existing High School Enrollment, Capacity and Utilization, 2007...............PSF-5 Table PSF-7 Existing Middle School Enrollment, Capacity and Utilization, 2007............PSF-6 Table PSF-8 Summary of Enrollment, Capacity and Utilization, 2006 ...................I.........PSF-6 Table PSF-9 Student Residency Locations...................................................................PSF-10 Table PSF-10 Student Counts by School Level Type and Residence Category ............PSF-11 a Residential Dt Dwelling by Category.........................................PSF-12 Table PSF-12 Pasco County Student Generation Rates.................................................PSF-12 Table PSF-13 Residential Building Permits, 199712007..................................................PSF-12 Table PSF-14 Department of Education COFTE Forecast..............................................PSF-14 Table PSF-15 Resident Student Population Projection Summary, 2007-2016 ...............PSF-17 Table PSF-16 Elementary School SCSA 2 Long-Term Concurrency..............................PSF-18 Management Plan Table PSF-17 Middle School Concurrency Service Areas............. ....PSF-19 ............................. Table PSF-18 High School Concurrency Service Areas .................................................PSF-20 Table PSF-19 Elementary School Concurrency Service Areas.......................................PSF-20 • Table PSF-20 Proposed Public School Facilities . ..........................................................PSF-22 Table PSF-21 Elementary School Utilization, 2008/09 through 2012/13.........................PSF-23 Table PSF-22 Middle School Utilization, 2008/09 through 2012/13 ................................PSF-25 Table PSF-23 High School Utilization, 2008/09 through 2012/13 ..:................................PSF-26 Table PSF-24 Five-Year Capacity Project Schedule, 2007/08 -2011/12.......................PSF-31 • Table PSF-25 Five-Year Other Project Schedule, 007/08-2011/12............................PSF-32 Table PSF-26 Ten-Year Capacity Improvement Costs, 2011/12-2016/17 ...................PSF-33 Table PSF-27.. 20-Year Capacity Improvement Costs, 2016/17-2026/27......................PSF-34 .Table PSF-28 20-Year Maintenance Costs, 2011/12-2016/17......................................PSF-35 Table PSF-29 ' Total Revenues for Pasco County Schools, 2007/08-2011/12.:............PSF-36 Table PSF-30 Total Revenues Summary, 2007/08-2011/12........:.................:................PSF-37 Table PSF-31 Summary of Revenue/Expenditures Available for New Construction & Remodeling Projects �. ..............................PSF-38 ............ City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-ii 0R 13X797Ø 7970 PG 810 . " 57 of 114 Public School Facilities Elemen Prepared:August 25, 200 4ist of Figures Figure PSF-1 Elementary School Attendance Boundaries...............................................PSF-7 Figure PSF-2 Middle School Attendance Boundaries...................:...................................PSF-8 Figure PSF-3 High School Attendance Boundaries..........................................................PSF-9 Figure PSF-4 Student Enrollment Growth Rates, 1991-92 through 2005-06 .................PSF-13 Figure PSF-5 Overlay for Co-Location Criteria, East Pasco................:. ......PSF-29 List of Maps Map PSF-1 Schools and Ancillary Facilities, 2007..................................................Appendix Appendix C rap PSF-2 Proposed.Schools, Ancillary Facilities & Renovations ......................Appendix C Map PSF-3 Community Focal Point & Co-location Opportunities ........................ Appendix C ap PSF-4 Elementary School Concurrency Service Areas................................Appendix Appendix C Map PSF-5 Middle School Concurrency Service Areas....................................... Appendix C IJlap PSF-6 High School Concurrency Service Areas ..........................................Appendix C \)lap PSF-7 Education Centers School Concurrency Service Areas ....................Appendix C j - City of Zephyrhiils 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-iii OR BK 7970 PG 811 • 58 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 [This page intentionally left blank.] . I I � j � I City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan • Page PSF-iv OR BK 7970 PG 812 59 of 114 i Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 I. Purpose The high importance of:the public school system to communities is undisputed. We look to educational institutions- to cultivate our young into productive and contributing members of society. When a public school system is successful in its mission, the community it serves is better able to compete in regional markets. Homebuyers and relocating businesses see quality schools as a top locational criterion. As such, there is a strong correlation between schools and the local tax base. • Recognizing the significance of public school facilities in the achievement numerous,community objectives, the 2005 Florida Legislature enacted Iegislationamending sections 163.3180 and 163.3177(12), Florida Statute. These sections mandate that local government comprehensive plans include a Public School Facilities Element which establishes concurrency requirements for pdjblic school facilities. The purpose'of this element is to ensure adequate public school facilities in the City of Zephyrhills for existing and future school-age residents. Section 9J-5.025, Florida Administrative Code, sets forth the minimum 'content for the Public S hool Facilities Element. Per the requirements of this section, the element must address: Existing public school facility deficiencies; • Public school facilities required, to meet future needs; School level of service standards; A five-year schedule of school-related capital improvements that ensures adequate school capacity and is financially feasible; Provisions to ensure that public school facilities are: •. located consistent with existing and proposed residential areas they serve, used as community focal points, and - co-located with other public facilities; Mapping requirements (e.g., existing, school sites, anticipated,future school sites, ancillary. facilities, and School Concurrency Service Areas); and. School planning and concurrency goals, objectives, and policies. T thIe Public School Facilities Element establishes public school facility level of service standards, concurrency management system procedures and coordination mechanisms between the governmental entity charged with providing public school facilities (i.e., District School Board of Pasco County) and, those that regulate new development (i.e.,. Pasco County and the mLunicipalities in Pasco County). These provisions serve to ensure that adequate facility capacity is available-before or concurrent with the demand generated by new development. I ' 11 Existing Conditions . Population Trends . ' , Table PSF-1 shows the current population estimate and projected population to,year 2025 for th City and Pasco County as a whole. Growth rates in,the City have continued to increase approximately 3.0 percent per year in the 1990s to approximately 0.5 percent per year in the 2000s. This .trend is projected to continue over the 2020 Comprehensive Plan timeframe. City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PS F-1 OR BK 7970 PG 813 60 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 C nversely, Pasco County had grown at a rate of approximately 5.0 percent annually since 2 00. Countywide projections anticipated a slowinglof this rate over the planning period. Table PSF-1 Population Trends and Projections City of Zephyrhills and Pasco County Census Counts J Estimate Projections Jurisdiction 1970 1980 1990 2000 2006 2010 2015 2025 Zephyrhills 3,369 5,742 8,220 10,833 12,579 13,710 15,301 18,051 Pasco . 59,370 136,130 281,131 344,768 450,171 499,600 620,850. 742,100 County Total SOURCES: US Census of Population and Housing; UniveIrsity of Florida Bureau of Economics and Business Research, Pasco County and City of Zephyrhills,2008. P pulation projections prepared by the Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing at the University of Florida. New residents will create demand for housing and urban support uses, such as schools. - D velopment Trends Pasco .County is one of the fastest growing counties within the Tampa-St. Petersburg- Clearwater Metropolitan Area. Most growth has been in central and eastern Pasco County where land is abundant for new development. Growth in southeast Pasco is predominantly in the form of single family residential located on the perimeter of the City boundaries as well as in ill and . redevelopment in established neighborhoods. The City of Zephyrhills annexed approximately 1,000 acres that are planned for predominantly single family residential with a buildout of approximately 3,000 units. Residential development is the primary contributor Ito student population growth and, therefore, has the most significant impact on public school facilities. The 2000 US Census reported a total of 6,167 housing units within the City. Based on the 2000 population, the average household size in the City is 2.3 persons per household. The distribution of housing by dwelling type is shown below in Table PSF-2. The dominant housing type in the City is single-family, fbllowed'by multi-family. Table PSF-2 Housing Distribution by Type City of Zephyrhills &Pasco County Dwellin T e Zephyrhills Pasco County g YP 2000 % 2005 % Single Family 3,762 61 130,316 64.1 Multi-Family 493 8 23,983 11.'.8 Manufactured Housing 1,850 30 48,753 24.0 Other 62 1 397 0.0 Total 6,167 100 203,449 100 Source:US Census Bureau, Census 2000 Summary File 3 and 2005 American Community Survey. City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-2 OR BK 7970 PG 814 61 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 Considering the projected population, average number of persons per household in the City, the e�isting inventory of dwelling units (minus demolitions) in the City, and a vacancy factor, the Shimberg Center has projected the construction Ineeds for dwelling units° by dwelling type through the year 20.10. The analysis shown in Table PSF-3 predicts the single-family units and multi-family units will be needed to support the City's 2010 population which will be udated in 2008 through 2020. Table PSF-3 Projected Demand for Dwellings, 2000-2010 • City of Zephyrhills** 2000 2005 2010 Single- Multi- Single- Multi- Single- Multi- Family Family Family Family Family Family • 3,689 1,115 3,964 1,192 1 4,195 1,267 Source:Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing, University of Florida, 1996. **City is in the process of updating the housing data/information as part of EAR based amendments in 2008 School Enrollment Trends According..to the Florida Department of Education (FDOE), there were 52,649 public school. st dents (Pre-K through.12) attending public school in Pasco County in 2002. This represents ar approximate average of one,student per every four households. Between 2002 and 2007, enrollment in Pasco County schools grew from 52,649 to '62,441 students, or by almost 19 p rcent. Table PSF-4 shows the trends in the last five years by school type: T ough the overall trend shows an increase in student enrollment, school districts throughout. Florida have been experiencing a decline in the annual percentage increases in enrollment. The drpp in enrollment in 2005 could be partially the result of the lingering effect of the hurricanes in 2004 and the emigration of families to other parts of the state. The drop.in the rate of growth in ei rollment may be temporary, and it remains to be seen whether this is the beginning of a trend. Table PSI -4 Enrollment Change by School Type, 2002-2007 Pasco County Elementary Middle High Total Annual Growth Year PK-5 (6-8) (9-12) Percentage Actual 2002 24,693 12,777 15,179 52,649 - Actual 2003 25,754 13,501 15,642 54,897 4.1% ActuaI20'04 27,245 14,083 16,571 57,899 5.2% Actua12005 28,727. • 13,930 • 17,420 60,077 3.6%0 Actual 2006 29,503 14,461 17,892 61,856 • 3.0% Projected 2007 29,723 , 14,714 18,004 62,441 0.9% SOURCES: Florida Department of Education,2007. City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-3 012 BK 797O PG 815 62 of 114 Public School Facilities Element I ' Prepared:August 25, 2008 • School Facilities Capacity and Utilization The School District of Pasco County currently operates 43 elementary schools, 14 middle schools and 11 high schools. Based on the 20-day count of enrolled students conducted each year by the District, the current enrollment, capacity and-utilization of each school,- by school type have been identified (see tables PSF-5 thru PSF-7). There are currently 57,455 permanent student stations available to accommodate the existing student of population of 63,451. This deficiency is accommodated through temporary classroom facilities, primarily in the form of relocatable classrooms. Currently, 16 of 40 elementary schools, six of 13 middle schools, and two of 10 high schools operate at an enrollment to capacity rate less than or equal to 100 percent. Table PSF-5 Elementary School Enrollment, Capacity and Utilization, 2007 District School Board of Pasco County School 20-Day Count 2007/2008 FISH Current Enrollment 2007 Capacity Utilization -Anclote 580 489 119% Calusa 687 657 105% Centennial 674 659 102% Chasco 699 624 112% Cotee River . 694 766 ;,£ 91% Rodney B. Cox 434 506 36% u; Cypress 877 568 154% Deer Park 616 - 600 103% Denham Oaks 855 838 102% Double Branch 704 762 92% Fox Hollow 672 726 ; 93% ,. Mary Giella 639 634 101% Gulf Highlands 606 762 80% Gulf Trace 223 762 �29n/o .e Gulfside 607 634 ' 96°/ s-- g Hudson 749 551 136% Lacoochee 377 579 a Y5.65% Lake Myrtle 800 754 106% Mitt a P. Locke 833 724 115% Longleaf 856 674 119% James M. Marlowe 540 616 88°le ., ,, a, Moon Lake 646 616 105% New River 245 762 w 3 % Northwest 660 720 � 9 `_ Oakstead 969 762 127% Pasco 663 715 x93% Pine View 709 624 114% Quail Hollow 796 465 171% Richey 605 558 108% San Antonio 682 597 • 114% Sand Pine 740 535 138% Sanders Memorial 820 640 128% City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-4 OR BK 7970 PG 816 63 of 114 Public School Facilities Element { Prepared:August 25, 2008 Table PSF-5 Elementary School Enrollment, Capacity and Utilization, 2007 District School Board of Pasco County School 20-Day Count 2007/2008 FISH Current Enrollment 2007 Capacity Utilization % Schrader 562 736 76doi Seven Oaks 1,121 674 166% Seven Springs 608 i 629 Shady Hills 534 1 437 122% Sunray 577 668 x $6°10 ` Chester W. Taylor 812 { 536 151% i. Trinity 652 621 105% Trinity Oaks 637 758 ; $4�/0 , '; Wesley Chapel 1,075 618 174% West Zephyrhills 806 774 . 104% Woodland 932 { 670 139% Total 29,573 25,292 106% Notes: - Indicates an enrollment to capacity ratio less,thal or equal to 100 percent. Source: Florida Department of Education,2007. Table PSF-6 Middle School Enrollment, Capacity and Utilization, 2007 District School Board of Pasco County School 20-Day Count 2007/2008 FISH Current Enrollment 2007 Capacity Utilization Bayonet Point 984 886 111% Centennial 657 616 107% Charles S. Rushe 1,215 I 1,306 Chasco 867 848 102% Gulf 953 1,344 _v=71 !I1 Hudson 1,196. 1,053 114% Dr. John Long 1,522 1,287 118% Pasco 729 759 Paul R. Smith 916 1,287 ` 71°1� 7 Pine View 894 - 1,184 River Ridge - 1,415 { 1,078 131% Seven Springs 1,335 1,310 102% Raymond B. Stewart 1,015 1,10492°la Thomas E. Weightman 1,075 I 975 110% Total 14,773 15,037 98% Notes: O Indicates an enrollment to capacity ratio less than or equal to 100 percent. Source: Florida Department of Education,2007. City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-5 { 797 8111 OR BK PG 64 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 Table PSF-7 High School Enrollment, Capacity and Utilization, 2007 District School Board of Pasco County School 20-Day Count 2007/2008 FISH Current Enrollment 2007 Capacity Utilization Gulf 1,843 1,620 114 Hudson 1,739 1,606 108 Land O' Lakes 1,762 1,458 121 J.W. Mitchell 2,570 1,938 133 Pasco 1,337 1,069 125 Ridgewood 2,036 1,316 155 River Ridge 2,030 1,883 108 Sunlake 1,121 1,814 , ` ,662 { Wesley Cha el 1,646 1,518 108 Wire grass Range 1,338 1,761 :x76 Zephyrhills rhills 1,683 1,143 147 Total 19,105 17,126 112% Notes: LJ Indicates an enrollment to capacity ratio less than or equal to 100 percent. Source: Florida Department of Education,2007. As shown in Table PSF-8, the DOE under-projected the number of enrolled students in Pasco County in 2007 by 1,010 students. The increase in enrolled students above the projection reverses the trend observed over the last few years. Lower enrollments experienced in Pasco County schools were not uncommon in other Florida communities. Table PSF-8 Summary of Enrollment, Capacity and Utilization, 2007 District School Board of Pasco County School Level 20-Day Count FISH Capacity Utilization Enrollment 2007 October 2007 % Elementary 29,573 28,000 106% Middle • 14,773 15,037 98% High 19,105 • 17,126 112% Totals • 63,451 57,455 110% DOE COFTE Forecast 62,441 57,455 109% Notes: DOE COFTE—Florida Department of Education Capital,Outlay Full Time Equivalent(student count). Source: Florida Department of Education,2007. T e locations of existing schools and ancillary facilities operated by the School District are shown in Map PSF-1 in Appendix C. Ancillary facilities include bus garages, maintenance facilities and District offices FiguresPS 1 thna PSF 3 depicts'U- ::% Board school atiendance boundaries City Zephyrhills Comprehensive Ze h rhills 2020 Com rehensive Plan Page PSF-6 L-dSd abed ueld 9n!su@gejdWoO 0Z0Z sll!4JAgdeZ JO AT!O iii 0 Od 1t ! L5J I - k'+ 1 # 13 4 : I k j'.s-y" 3- 1�s� � q ,_ b ! q:•;,...y, � - ________ CD ' .itI 'r y€ z , .a 8OO? `9?jsn6nb:paaedald juawa88 S01j!j e_4I00LPS ojIgfld �^ VT T -O 99 69 9d OL L A8 210 i� k°,2e 'L3 Sep a3L UT£t�T e3I"C(i N '` 'Ikt� Irwcri Li 9 I: mVLJ 0 e� , Y ��a_ s at atJ - 8 $ ' ' �`" °'N < � s.,_ �+ * �,tv ! �ry ck g r a � � - � fix'�`�� �. a,, � '� & „ „».r. � i .)- v r �'�' �k t ` Iv r y F �v �•sy�`u 3 wa i .1 ,+ Y. P� �.} �; .—..v:....a::.-i».a.,..i` f �.�.»-"'--�''-..—..,.».�. sw:. .xz 4 .,.. a�3:.x '•:: c ,..� z. wk' € ; w� 4 i � •� �,? _ H ( �m 4i A r s >< { z�.y s r r-"»r. px :.x..,j,t" �e b"'•b. k� k,.,�.l,.w' "to. ^� nrx x, _ (6 OL3U4T $ d 'lav r ' __ z r` s ':r'y {' es'`a ht aj ' , .e. ,Jx`az ;= I t 3HEi �3T3IH} _ 5iL3t s3 •k ' afx+ a •s' `�s ..I Ix ,rJ.z� �v yw � ��r "a�.c ar.� � � c � ₹! k '$ fi• `tx '' ; �(�>z�# 'v d�� '��� N f ! s'^'a { ➢s ' z .�1`t5�Y } red`` s s .,�. _:� z t� ° 'z'�,"3°' �„ECR `' U 34' a ! 3a 3 u i d za xa &2 s ` h '. g. O d + X r>r r. ✓". x k a v e v 5 Ld j fL'H '� '' d..,t',', L way w g, R spy �, 1 ) r ix •. �''1 "'y to ! p 3� a V :r; fix'.� rig. ?' �.s .,'�� "' "�'.'. ,vS� ��z�•� l�tiz�a Su���`�.; '# � r�,"�� � �� d�`A- �`d �'.,•vY .»".,fib �:' r � r "`3 � )�`tk₹ .₹A*�y kk5 y 'F: k'a�'N ' tS f•R : ? +` & X Q: x3 `rx xr.... sy � a xtr� i• �' r13� 'v r .,,�z+,�„. `� .�k'ri�"•.` r � v� r �a`�� � �x f�^2i l: �¢ x�pd, � bW�.. �s� u� z>$ ��. RA " „�,g ', z i�'""v' 'x`<.� z .��,�,', z s�,f °'h'a l:it it �i� ivy ? o; '.: do t9• { �,fiy j z�₹:'` ,�'`°�,z t `ry r S. 4s �, z t'= "� " '{�',in w. "'f 3 .,iR�.,{.'.^s•�'� r =f .'g >,i '.W� c; ,{ n s 'rz.:�{ d .��,` '9 ._ "" l -- s ,, ?�` -.aj s n • �+k � r. - ,s `gyp a +.s. s 4a �r =4: ''z•��z x�'� ;�� � � ₹d� �� r�', �c �z, �4 � "� z _ �. � j -, as ��''�� i��E �' �s` x: �, � 4 � n.� "` y`;: � ". 5�✓b��,'� %y�`� ^.�' s�5fi�d � "r'� �r 9 rI� &� �.. .',� x,:.,:wa„i1•�.•.,.zr: .�..,,.≥M:�.,- �.�.�ran.:�� i}�r��1..r'`rr��.. .��.�:..x...��..�. �...z,d�.'^�`�:�� :...Cs�`rs+# x�i ��'. ',a;�l solaepuno8 o3uepue;;d Ioo4oS elppIW Z- Sd an6i� ,pa„}, —�— ps> a " rz �i. � rR � & „ r fi '' a v �� 9 «uc? •� � ��. ,'' �x�� � _� ���'�� � � �-�- ����� �..tea-w t ... „ .3.»a...a`. -r:..,— :;..r r., ' t �" - s,. % _,r,.,a,_, -_�' ^" ...p, ,� ra ae-zs•w..as r )�' 'a 1 p � Figure PSF-3 High School Attendance Boundaries �,x � w � _n . z r � ,.i y. Se—' I x a•: rss tat"ub s .Six f 5 Zk� N�' .�"',�.�t .: x� ar' v-s' '�'�r4we & x r^ s — '�.✓f�,$r Ix :.�� -P �.,r ��'d r3.s,N x��s.,t..'' � Rg.: �� �5d��'} .•,t: ₹ �}� . -•�, :T1 (F�..� .-a-.... rw^ f PS m,� fix p s .... f a R �g 9y w,�. iDWO ' } � 4t (� NO � e� �ra s�s-� ��: .».' '���• � "3I�`� i � � s'�, >� h' Al� A, g�,�' '�w�"j� `4 v., � p, '� �� z er��, +.5;,� ..,,.. ,-s `.: �- .`.,2P W'.w� >... ., �. �A � •;��^+d y^.a�1 �� � p��} !. "fry-,-z,�"7 3•,r� k{� '`i-' a '� .rti p ,� � =• :.V"�,�.H >. ,�a �x A P �, ���>� � 6�,��3'�„��: � i'�h�cw� �"�° '' r�`�� 9�ar �, ?`'•�€:_.. ""�, :.'., : g� �.., - ;�" r k ..: .. r .,:ii 'ti �! ,E,.�,t 3. y, r .. '. " 3�. 3 L n :::=✓w',+ 3, -.. n ti .:.:...r v p :..:._. ... r. `N�t '.: .,, u„i. ':� �'.r,.'. 'm az� -s � �.'.y� w.w�; 'rw:. '" � O :�� ad; C ��g,. �_.,... .. 3 ��:._ •,. ��._t&:... .. .. :�:� ...�kr.�-�..%:ero ks ��'�}f��i..�i �', 't�,≥�;:, �.3{�^-,�€�F""�� c,#,�;%�9. 1(�ap,�s-.." ,",w „r�:"`''"�1_ �i%��- -- —- ' ...� k.'.w.: ''.r P ya.. TVu'. �. i::...:.. t T.. d ,y.°(,'S•1i 3 Y i�S'[�Q ^�'Mif_ Y�i''A....e ur ,„t�L h,.��6 fz 5. '-4 :f -.'s�"Z,�..._ �O ..� ., ?v`Cr ..� ,y� A�,, :N ,,. ,,;ya � a ''•c !a'SU 9�5 .,.., a �`k i '� �� r,I,,..��?",, ,;r..ti�a'",'7y�x� wY 5 �; ,'�,�.,.0 ;, i ,3. d t. ,�' - a .,x eCl-..� •d+ fvf�i'.w� ■_mss. fi ;t.;:.,a kl ,�`'r.:.� E.�s { �- 'C{ M1$ -r..; .. � ..::; t.�� a"� - ..g h :�"'�3 .�.::�,�a� �2'�F s ' 'i � L.i,�.._ # ru�may > .. ' `�z � di� t n5_. S 3'�.( i xuW'� yf - 3 `� H' Y.a` h 2 5kf H ,�xiy,� .. z,ETt k S'ty' T , ♦� /� 3., :::,.1•` t, -"s:--r----x' t � � t i y s^�i, i�sae }% r ',C F�df `" �.`emu'r, M W y„^"'%' .., � �� sr.� �r � ....,,, .' ,n��`£''' �v � �>v. ,,.�" �ws��� c«s ��-' �' �,.Y.��.: x � .�, n-- a `� '�.✓ � sa� h._.;�, �aF � O) [ IFH}F6EIe"Ga kIGEil1 71 L DIs5TB1CT ShcOG 11.,HUMW, CL v o '� Rsi,��z�xE3��a HI�IS�� L rn tiiI r rl P,.t✓ . .,> alix x'!a} «: r,• 7970 821 DR BK PG 68 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 Ill. Demand and Needs Analysis Student Generation Rates The student impact of proposed residential developments was assessed using established students generation trends by housing type in Pasco County. Methodology To determine student generation rate (SGR) trends, the inventory of Pasco County school facilities as of November 2006 was examined. The facilities included in the analysis were public schools; charter schools and education centers (see listing in Exhibits section of this element). Other facilities, such as' Moore Mickens Adult Education Center and the Sheriffs Detention Center, were not included in the analysis. To, determine student residency types and locations, October 2006 student enrollment data for school levels kindergarten through 12th grade, charter schools and education centers in Pasco County were analyzed. In the analysis, student residential addresses were geocoded' and matched to physical addresses in Pasco County Property Appraiser's parcel data and the Pasco County Physical Address and GIS Address tables. The parcel. identification numbers were tied to tax parcels in the Property Appraiser's DR-590 and Master Appraisal File (MAF) data for determination of property use, and to the Pasco County GIS cadastral layer for location determination2. Where direct matches could not be made, attempts were made to identify a parcel in the immediate area that would have the same residential category. Only student records,with high confidence levels in the residence type are considered.to have been identified. Not all student records could be tied to a residence jtype or a location within the County. Some addresses were either out of the County, incomplete or irresolvable, such as records tied to a post office box. On some parcels, the matched tax parcel did not indicate a residential property use. Of the students with addresses in the County, 99 percent were tied to a residential category(see Table PSF-9). Table PSF-9 Student Residency Locations Pasco County Student Residency Residence Type Residential Address Not Address Total Identified Category Unclear in County Irresolvable Enrolled 62,337. 536 ! 450 '47 63,370 • Sources: Pasco County Property Appraiser DR-590 and Master Appraisal File and Pasco County Physical Address and GIS Address tables,2006. Fo, consistency, residential units countywide were assigned to housing categories based on their assignment of use by the Property Appraiser Master Appraisal File, with additional Geocoding is the process of determining the geographic coordinates of each student address on a cadastral map.A cadastral map indicates the legal boundaries and the ownership of property, and was used to create a database and serves of maps for the Pasco County public school facilities needs analysis. 2 The Master Appraisal File contains use codes for each building,while the DR-590 contains Florida Department of • Revenue property use codes that indicate the clearest.and best use of the tax parcel. City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-10 OR BK 7,970 PG 822 69 o£ 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 information taken from the DR-590 and-the Property Appraiser Apartment and Manufactured Home/Recreational Vehicle Park lists. Additional research was performed_to determine property use and unit counts, as needed. The following are definitions of the three residential classifications.o Mobile Homes (Manufactured Homes): Residential units assigned a "02" (Mobile Home) Master Appraisal File code and mobile home unit counts for parcels with a "28" (Mobile Home/RV Parks) DOR classification,,including any additional counts taken from the Property Appraiser or Department of Health Mobile Home Park lists. Multi-Family: Single and multi-story residential properties assigned a "03" (Multi-Family with >4 Units/Bldg), "05" (Multi-Story Retirement Apartments) or "08" (Multi- Family with <5 Units/Bldg) Master Appraisal File code and those properties listed on the Property Appraiser Apartment list. it Single Family: Residential units assigned with a "01" (Single Family Residential) or "07"- (Single Family Villas) Master Appraisal File code and those properties with residences jl coded as "12" (Mixed Use: Stores/Office with Single Family Residential). Table PSF-10 shows Pasco County student counts by housing type and school level. A separate category was not used for properties hawing a formal Declaration of Condominium (Florida Department of Revenue classification of. "04" Condominium) as the condominium classification does not indicate property use. Those parcels were assigned a classification based on usage detail in the Master Appraisal File. A listing of Department of Revenue and Master Appraisal File land use codes are provided in the Exhibits section of this element. Table PSF-10 Student Counts by School Level Type and Residence Category Pasco County UCategory Elementary Middle High Total Mobile Home 3,518 IU 1,781 2,249 7,548 Multi-Family 2,666 1,126 1,388 5,180 Single Family 23,163 1 11,673 14,774 49,609 Total 29,347 14,580 18,410 62,337 Source: Florida Department of Revenue, Pasco County Property Appraiser and Pasco County,2006. A umber of communities in Pasco County have deed restrictions that forbid permanent residence by minors. A.list of these communities !is included in the Exhibits section of this element. Table PSF-1 1 displays the effect of these deed-restricted communities on the net dwelling units used to calculate the student generation rates. Because these deed-restricted communities do not contribute to the student population, dwelling unit types and counts for these communities were determined and then removed from the total number of units prior to u1 calculating the student generation rates. VI To determine the SGRs, the total numbers of students in each residential category by school level type were divided by the net dwelling units for that residential classification. The SGRs for Pasco County by school level andhousing category are shown in Table PSF-12. The planned type and number of dwelling units are multiplied by the appropriate SGR to estimate the projected student population in applicable School Concurrency Service Area. Based on the City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan I. Page PSF-11 ! I OR BK 7970 PG 823 70 of 114 I , Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 SGRs in Table PSF-10, for every 100 new single� family housing units constructed in Pasco County, 36 Kindergarten - 12th grade students will be generated. Table PSF-11 Residential Dwelling Unit Counts by Category Pasco County Total Dwelling I Units in Deed Net Dwelling Category Units Restricted Communities Units Manufactured Housing 46,842 I 6,344 40,498 Multi-Family 28,860 404 28,456 Single Family 141,777 3,417 138,360 { Source: Pasco County,2006 Table PSF-12 Pasco County Student Generation Rates Pasco County Category Elementary Middle High. Total Manufactured.Housing 0.09 0.04 0.06 0.19 Multi-Family 0.09 0.04 0.05 0.18 Single Family 0.17 0.08 0.11 0.36 Source: Pasco County,2006. Projected Public School Facility Demand Presently, the District uses the State's Capital Outlay Full Time Equivalent (COFTE) student coil nt along with the District's school-by-school cohort projections to develop public school facility demand projections. Several factors made, projecting county student populations by school geography particularly challenging. First, evidence indicates that school enrollments throughout Florida are in a transition period. After! many years of moderate to high growth, recent years have seen slower and even negative student growth in a number of Florida counties (refer to Figure PSF-4). Consequently; recent student projections. have been dramatically scaled back as anticipated student and population growth in all age cohorts has fallen far short of actual numbers. A leading indicator of student growth is housing permit data. Table PSF-13 shows housing permit data for Pasco County over a ten year period. The slowdown in permit activity is a trend that is expected to continue in Pasco County in the hear term. Table PSF-,13 Residential Building Permits, 1997-2007 .Pasco County I Building Permits by Year 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2,191 2,504 3,032 2,931 3,860 4,786 ; 5,883 6,300 7,252 4,723 1,886 Source: Pasco County Central Permitting, November 2007. ii City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-12 it OR BK 7970 PG 824 71 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 Figure PSF-4 Student Enrollment Growth Rates, 1991-92 through 2005-06 Pasco County 1 £ Growth Rate E a ✓ t t 4.000 ii= 3.000 2.000 r� 1.00000 �t z 0.0001QY, ... 1991 .1992-€1U 2R_1994 1995 '19g0- 1997 1999,2000 200O 20O1 2002 2003 2004 2005 i992H993i994j 1995 1996 1997 7i 9982000200t2002 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004' 2005 2006 ` Kthrouugh 12 3.Ofif} g 3.�66 1.647 0X92 4.944.2.270 36043.20 x.2721 x.646 4.916 4385698 4.231 ' .._... Year Source: Demographic Data for Decision Making, Inc.(2007) In times of population transition like the present, population projections are especially prone to miscalculation. With only one year of slowed growth observed, it is very difficult to predict the precise path that a future slowdown might take. A time-series approach using past growth rate trer1ids is not reliable under such circumstances. The decline•has not occurred over a long enough period to take such a statistical approach. Another demographic projection technique— • grade progression analysis—also suffers. Past grade progressions based on relatively high student growth rates are not effective indicators of short-run future trends. A third approach uses future housing data and student generation rates to project future enrollments. This approach is not viable because Pasco County housing projections are not currently available. Florida Department of Education COFTE On an annual basis, the DOE publishes the Capital Outlay Full Time Equivalent (COFTE) enrollment projections for every grade in every school district in Florida for a 10-year period. The DOE employs a standard cohort survival method using five-year enrollment trends. The District relies on these projections for its five-year planning process. Table PSF-14 identifies the COFTE projected student growth through school year 2017/2018. Use of the COFTE projections for concurrency planning has several drawbacks including: , I The projections by the DOE are based on the average of two head counts, one in October and one in February. Thus, the COFTE tends to under project the number of high school students in the fall by factoring winter drop-outs in the spring count. For facilities planning, the District wants to insure that adequate classrooms are available for peak conditions in the fall semester and, therefore, prefers to use the October full-time equivalency (FTE) count to support facilities planning. The DOE forecast is not available until July of each year. Using the October count, the District is able to prepare a new forecast by spring. City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-13 • PSF-14 Department of Education COFTE Forecast Pasco County Pasco Total • 2007 Capital Outlay FTE Forecast Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Grade 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-2000 2003-2009 2009-2010 2010-2811 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 Birth Data 3,511 3,607 3,772 3,912 3,927 4,436 4,723 4,711 4,842 4,973 5,107 5,235 5,357 5,479 O fork N.. �p PreK 421 416 398 415 465 478 464 498 51'1 524 537 549 562 573 Grade K 4,828. 4,617 4,694 4,757 4,885 5,499 5,665 6,866 6,022 6,186 6,352 6,505 6,658 6.809 Grade 1 4,405 4,757 4,891 4,828 5,003 5,140 5,768 6,162 6,178 6,337 6,509 +1,683 6,846 7,006 Grade 2 4,421 4,574 4,846 4,924 4,985 5,164 5,306 5,943 6,356 6,381 6,543 6,720 6,899 7,068 W Grade 3 4,907 4,917 4,967 5,124 5,281 5,293 5,421 5,5.12 6,102 6,466 6,478 6,64.1 6,819 6,999 O No Grade 4 4,5018 4,688 4,828 4,765 5,076 5,293 5,359 5,544 5,692 6,363 6,762 6,777 6,948 7,136 N Grade 5 3,965 4,758 4,880 4,910 4,948 5,271 5496 5564 5,756 5,910 6,605 7,020 7,038 7,215 C Grade 6 4,636 4,254 4,967 5,049 5,192 5,232 5,572 5,8.12 5,865 6,067 6,250 6,982 7,423 7,443 71 0 Grade 7 4,623 4,852 4,469 5,111 5,312 5,462 5,505 5,860 6,113 6,191 6,403 6,576 '7,341 7,807 41 ' Grade 9 5,790 6,145 5,69'1 6,108 5,930 6,599 6,969 7,212 7,319 7,699 8,047 9,215 8,466 8,704 cp Grade 10 4,258 4,506 4,714 4,392 4,631 4545 4,976 5,280 5,481 5,579 5,843 6,109 6,256 6,442 Grade 11 3,592 3,718 4.150 4,165 4,023 4,'196•; 4,149 4,486 4,771 4,967 5,070 5,293 5,633 5,680 Grade 12 2,931 3,051 3,137 3,3'3'9 3,429 3,312 3,455 3,416 3,694 3,926 4,089 4,174 4,358 4,555 <- 57.889 60,077 61,856 62,441 64,455 66,988 69,985 72,861 76,963 78,953 81,905 84,879 87,962 91,043 CD m 0 ca Grade Level Summary Prek-5 27,245 28,727 29,503 29,723 ' 30,644 32,1313 33,699 35,089 36,617 38,167' 39,786 40,895 41,770 42,808 13-8 14,083 13,930 14,461 14,714 15,798 16,198 16,737 17,378 18,071 18,613 19,070 20,193 21,579 22,856 () 9-12 16 571 '17,420 17,892 18,004 16,013 18,652 19.549 20.394 21,265 22.173 23,049 23,791 24,613 25,381 D @ N PreK 12 57,899 60,077 61,856 62,441 64,455 66,988 • 69,985 72,861 75,953 78,953 81,905 84,879 87,362 91,043 Growth Summary• PreK-5 220 921 1,494 1,561 1,390 1,528 1,550 1,619 • 1,'109 875 1,036 6-8 253 1,084 400 539 641 • 693 542 457 1,123 1,386 1,277 f~. 9-12 112 .9 639 897 845 871 908 .876 742. 822 768 C W Prep-12 • 585 2,014 2,533 2,997 2,876 . 3,092 3,000 2,952 2,974 3,083 3,081 0 m co OD OR BK 7970 PG 826 73 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 The DOE forecast does not count all students in the District's buildings and includes others that are not in District-owned buildings. For example, the DOE forecast excludes students in special or alternative schools or homebound settings. The I District's enrollment for facilities planning purposes includes only students in regular schools. By contrast, the DOE forecast includes only prekindergarten students that are in special education (ESE), while the District provides pre- kindergarten programs for many non-ESE students. Fiv Year Forecast The five-year forecast is the basis for the School District Educational Plant Survey and Five- Year Tentative Facilities Work Plan. The District develops the data and analysis for the Work Plan each spring for adoption during the following September. Enrollment projections -are •prepared using the DOE standard cohort model and the State of Florida birth projections. The District prepares the cohort projections for each school and for each grade, modifying information where boundary changes have affected trends or where staff has unique information• of housing trends. Student Enrollment Projections In order to plan for the future student population in Pasco County, historic.student enrollment growth rates were examined for the periods 2000-2005 and 2005-2006. The 2000-2005 period represented a period in which the rate of student growth often accelerated, while 2005-2006. showed a decline in the student enrollment growth rate. The differences between the two timeframes are depicted graphically in maps in the Exhibits section of this element (see exhibits PSF-5, PSF-8 and PSF-11 for 2000-2005 and exhibits PSF-6, PSF-9 and PSF-12 for 2005- 2006). Higher student enrollment growth rates were applied to areas experiencing higher levels of esidential growth. For areas approaching build-out, such as West Pasco, the rate of student enrollment was projected,to be stabile or decline. Negative Of the 16 Pasco County schools with negative 2005-2006 residential student Growth Rates growth rates, 14 are elementary schools. These schools include Chasco, Calusa, Gulf Highlands, Mary Giella, Schrader, Lacoochee, Gulfside, Fox • Hollow, Shady Hills, Deer Park, Trinity Oaks, West Zephyrhills, Pine View, and Hudson elementary schools, River Ridge Middle School and River Ridge High School. For each of these schools, the 2005-2006 negative growth rate was multiplied by the 2006 resident student count] The initial decline in student numbers was multiplied by 0.67 to get the final decline for the 2006-2007-year. This method was continued using the 0.67 multiplier each year to get the subsequent year's decline. For example, the 2005-2006 negative growth rate for Calusa Elementary was applied to its 2006 resident student population to obtain an initial decline of 64 students. This decline was multiplied by 0.67, indicating -43 students. For the subsequent year, the 43 student figure was multiplied by 0.67, indicating 29 students, and so on. The final 2016 projected resident student population for Calusa Elementary is 533 students, a decline of 127 students from 2006 student levels. The multiplication factor of 0.67 was chosen because it provided a more reason{ble growth pattern and a more reasonable (negative) growth end point than a strict methodology. City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-15 • f , OR BK 7970 PG 827 74 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 Modest There are 42 schools with relatively modest 2005-2006 residential student Growth Rates growth rates. In the calculations, the initial 2005-2006 positive growth number was replaced with a modified growth number. The modification was based on the fraction necessary to transform;the initial overall 2005-2006 growth number into the actual overall 2005-2006 growth number obtained when the students with uncodable addresses were added back into the equations. For elementary schools, the adjustment constant was 0.8392, for middle schools the adjustment constant was 0.7702, and for.high schools the adjustment constant was 0.878. School specific adjustment factors were not applied, and as a result the students with uncodable addresses were not assigned to their school of residence, only to their school level. This is the reason for using three separate adjustment constants. For example, the unmodified 2005-2006 growth rate was applied to yield an increase of 32 students at Sunray Elementary-. When the number was multiplied by 0.8392, it showed a! final 2006-2007 increase of 27 students. Then each following year, 27 more students were added to the prior year's total. This resulted in a final 2016 resident student projection of 1,202 students for Sunray Elementary, a gain of 269 students in ten years over the 2006 resident student count of 933. Exceptionally Five of the Pasco County residential school geographies had exceptionally High Growth high 2005-2006 growth rates (growth rates that exceeded the median school Rates growth rate by more than 2.5 times). This is a standard exploratory data definition for outlying and extreme values. Each school geography growth.rate was analyzed and computed separately based, in large part, on demographic judgment, use of various weighted II combinations of the 2000-2005 growth rate, the 2005-2006 growth rate and ti geo-coding adjustment factors. Using the methodology described in the foregoing, Pasco County's 2008 student population is projected to be 63,149, and the .2016 student population is projected to be 83,246 (The projection of students under the initial methodology was 64,807 in 2008, and 102,264 in 2016). Note: Projections of future resident students may contain a correction factor since future population projections are subject to economic and social conditions. I I Maps PSF-7, PSF-10 and PSF-13 in the Exhibits of this element show the geographic distribution of the projected resident student growth rates in Pasco County. Future growth in the student population is anticipated to be concentrated in the south-central part of Pasco County. Table PSF-15 is a summary of the resident student population projections by school level and year. Figure PSF-14 in the Exhibits of this element shows detailed projections by individual school. City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-16 OR BK 7970 PG 828 75 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 Table PSF-15 Resident Student Population Projection Summary, 2007-2016 Pasco County School Level 2007 2008 1 2010 2015 2016 Elementary 29,823 30,811 - 32,920 38,490 39,622 Middle 18,514 19,082 i20,232 23,727 23,727 High 14,812. 15,378 ! 16,506 19,332 19,898 Total 63,149 65,271 69,65 80,965 83,247 Source: Demographic Data for Decision Making, Inc.,2007. Indications support a decline, or slowing, of Pasco of the Pasco County student growth rate in the short run. However, the methodology employed does not have a non-arbitrary way of re- introducing a growth rate rebound into the projected counts. It is reasonable to believe that such a rebound is likely to begin sometime around 2008 to 2011, followed by an eventual growth rate decline when building in Pasco County begins to saturate currently zoned residential properties. Level of Service Standards An integral component of a concurrency management system is the level of service standard. Fo, public school facilities, the level of service standard is created by comparing school capacity to enrollment for each school type. Chapter 163.3177(12)(c), FS, requires that the Public School Facilities Element be based upon data and analysis that address, among other things, how level of service standards will be achieved and maintained. The prescribed level of service standards for public school facilities are set forth in the City's Public School Facilities and Capital Improvements elements as well as in the Interlocal Agreement for Coordination of Planning Activities, as amended. The level of service standards are used to establish maximum permissible.school utilization relative to the total capacity within a geographic SCSA. An essential component of determining the level of service standard for the geographic areas of the SCSAs is the ability of the District to adopt a financially feasible capital program that can achieve and maintain the level of service standards by school type for each SCSA. The level of se ice standards serve to ensure that new or expanded school facilities are built in time to accommodate students generated from new residential development. If capacity does not exist to support students generated by new development,) both the new students and the schools are burdened by the resulting overcrowding. Based upon permanent capacity, as determined by the Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH), the level of service standards determined to be financially feasible for Pasco County School Concurrency Service Area schools are: Elementary schools 11.5/0 of permanent FISH capacity Middle schools 115% of permanent FISH°capacity High schools 105%of permanent FISH capacitor Alternative Educational Facilities R 70%of permanentFISH capacity These level of service adopted by schoolj type countywide and measured within each. City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-17 OR BK 7970 PG 829 76 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 5C9A are based�u on a financial) feasible School Distract Ca ital Im rouements'Plan Long Term Concurrency Management F The Florida Legislature established in Chapter 163.3,180(9)(a), FS, a concurrency management system to address long-term needs of capacity where significant facility backlogs exist. As expressed in the statutes, each local government may adopt as a part of its plan, a long-term school concurrency management system with a planning period of up to 10 years for specially designated areas where backlogs exist. The plan may include interim level of service standards on certain facilities and shall rely on the local government schedule of capital improvements for up to 10 years as a basis for issuing development orders that authorize development in designated backlog areas. The long-term school concurrency management system must be designed to correct existing deficiencies and set priorities for addressing backlogged facilities. The long-term school concurrency management system must also be financially feasible and consistent with other portions of the Comprehensive Plan. Table PSF-16 shows the long term utilization for Elementary School SCSA 2, which is the only SCSA indicated to exceed its level of service standard=(11^5% of FISH capacity) As such, a' long-term concurrency management plan is required to correct the protected deficiencies in thisf SCSA. Through implementation of the long-term concurrency management plan, SCSA 2is anticipated to achieve the level of service standard at the end of the 10 year planning period_'. Table PSF-16 Elementary School School Concurrency Service Area 2 Long-Term Concurrency Management Plan School Year Utilization School Year Utilization 2008200.9 1"12% 2013-2014 ;125% 2009-2010 110%0 2013-2015 1 O9%' 2010-2011 11.0% 2015-201.6 3108% 201j2012 121% 2016-2017 112%0' 20:122013' 127% 2017201$ 11:;1 Source: Pasco County,2007. Tables PSF-17, PSF-18 and PSF-19 identify the elementary, middle, and high schools located in each SCSA, their existing capacity, their current enrollment and their projected enrollment for the current five-year planning period Table PSF 17 also 1 entfies capacity and cu rr ent_-and projected,enrollmenL_hrough'school year 2017/2:018 School Concurrency Service Areas A School Concurrency Service Area (SCSA) serves as the regulatory geographic delineation within which the adopted level of service is measured, and is an essential requirement for the application of concurrency. When applying concurrency on a less than district-wide basis, local governments and school districts need to demonstrate that school capacity is maximized to the greatest extent possible. The Florida Statutes permit a district-wide level of service for school concurrency for the first five years of a school concurrency program. Following the initial five years, there is a requirement that SCSAs be developed on a less than district-wide basis if not. already established with the initiation of school concurrency. For Pasco County, less than district-wide SCSAs are established. SCSA groupings for elementary, middle and high schools City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-18 OR BK 7970 Pc 830 77 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 are divided into two SCSAs for each school type. There are two SCSAs established for elementary schools, and two SCSAs for both middle schools and high schools The two SCSAs per school type are each unique and are divided along school attendance boundaries. Formulation of SCSAs Based on coordination with School District financiallal officers and the;student growth and capacity needs projections, groupings by school type served as the basis for two SCSA per school type To establish the geographic area for measuring the levels of service for school;concurr ency,Athe; following steps were used to create SCSA boundaries School District Planning FAreas and attendance area boundaries, coupled with the fiscal realities of the School Boards capital budget, serve as the basis for creating the two SCSAs for each school level The Planning Areas£are established for each school type x it order to track growth trends in the various parts of the County and to aid in projecting where and whenfi to build: additional schools These Planning Areas are the aggregation of attendance; boundaries, by3 school type for several schools that are geographically located`in the same part of the County and°which yshare similar growth patterns_= The grouped school attendance boundaries by school type byk Planning£Area were grouped and dissolved into two shapes, creating two SCSAs for each school type These groupings resulted in the creation of 2,SCSAs for elementary schools School District staff determined that for middle and high school types, dividing the County into two SCSAs would arse serve best for measuring public school facility level of service. The two SCSAs are essentially a north-south geographic split of the County. The southern SCSA is an aggregation of the school attendance boundaries along the high growth SR 54 corridor. The northern SCSA is an aggregation of the school attendance boundaries in the more stable growth areas of the north and west. Tables SF- 7 PSFm18,, and PSF19 and maps PSF 4 PSF , antl PSF 6; indicate the assignment of Pasco County schools by SCSA. Table PSF-17 Middle School Concurrency Service Areas Pasco County School Concurrency Service Area I 'School Concurrency Service Area 2 Bayonet Point Centennial Charles S. Rushe Crews Lake(FF) Chasco Hudson Gulf Dr. John Long River Ridge Pasco Seven Springs Pine View Paul R. Smith R.B. Stewart I Thomas Weightman Middle GG Middle HH Source: Pasco County,2007. City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSI=-19 OR BK• 797® PG 831 78 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 Table PSF-18 High School Concurrency Service Areas • Pasco County School Concurrency Service Area I School Concurrency Service Area 2 J. W. Mitchell Gulf River Ridge Sunlake Hudson Wesley Chapel Wire grass Ranch (Land O' Lakes High EEE • Zephyrhills i Pasco High FFF Ridgewood• Source: Pasco County,2007. Table PSF-19 Elementary School Concurrency Service Areas Pasco County r . School Concurrency Service Area 1 School ConcurrencyKService Area 2 Anclote. Moon-Lake Centennial Elementary P Calusa MP Locke I Chester Taylor Elementary T Chasco Northwest Denham Oaks Elementary U; Cotee':°Rived Oakstead` I Double Branch Elementary V Cypress Pine View rLacoochee Elementary W Deer Park Riche' New River Elementary`Z Fox Hollow Sanders Pasco Elementary B: Gulf Highlands Schrader Quail Hollow Elementary D Gulf Trace Seven Springs iRB Cox Es # Gulfside Shady Hills; `San Antonio` _ Hudson' Sunray Sand Pine Lake Myrtle Trinity iSeven Oaks. A � Longleaf Trinity Oaks I W.Ze h rh ills Marlowe Elementary0 Wesley Chapel Mary`.Giella` .t Woodland Source: Pasco County,2007. I I' Public School Facility Needs School Facilities Long Range Plan (10 and 20 Years) The school facilities identified in Table PSF-20 represent capacity projects needed to ensure the availability of satisfactory student stations for the projected student enrollment during two timeframes. The periods addressed include the five year period beyond the Five-Year District Facilities Work Plan and the long-term planning period (years 11 through 20). The greatest school facility need in Pasco County)is for additional elementary schools. There are 14 elementary schools scheduled to open between 2008 and 2016, but only three of these are located west of the Suncoast Parkway. Four elementary schools are planned for the central • portion of the County, between the Suncoast Parkway and 1-75, and the remaining seven elementary schools are planned east of I-75. Map PSF-2 Proposed Schools and Ancillary Facilities shows the proposed locations of schools in Pasco County through the planning period. All of the schools depicted will be located within unincorporated area. The projected locations for schools are consistent with the cohort student population forecasts for unincorporated Pasco City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-20 IG I • OR BK 7970 PG 832 79 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 County. ounty. Currently, there are no plans for school closures or disposition of facilities or facility space during the planning period. School.Facilities.and Ancillary olants Site Area Standards The anticipated land area requirements for the School District will continue to make use of a range=x of site zsizes` for public} schools depending on location, facility needs and physical; constraints of the site (e.g., wetlands) The average elementary school ranges'm size.from 15- 30 acres, with an average size of 20 acres. The size range for middle school sites is between` 25-45 acres, with an average, size of 33 acres High schools require the largest sites, with an average site size 3 of 61;acres The ancillary plants t will rely on the type of facility operation, ash well as t the natural features present at a site, to determine site sizes School sites purchased prior r` to January` 1, 2008, mare deemed consistent with the Comprehensive Plana; and the residential areas they serve Necessary,,'supporting on site and off site infrastructure costs associated with new schools will be shared to the f extent determined through negotiations with thek School District, in proportion to they benefit derived by they parties The negotiation process is defined in then lnterlocal: Agreement;as amended: H 0 II Ik f I i - I � ' 4 I I ' i . City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-21 I I OR BK 7970 PG 833 80 of 114 "i! Public School Facilities Eletrtent Prepared:August 25, 2008 Table PSF-20 Proposed Public School Facilities Pasco County Schedule of Capital Outlay Projects (Year 6 thru 10) West Pasco Central Pasco East Pasco New Elementary School "O" New Elementary School "A" New Elementary School "T" (Hudson) (Land O' Lakes) (Zephyrhills) `New Elementary School "S" New.Middle School "GG" New Elementary School "U" (Odessa) (Land O' Lakes) (Wesley Chapel) Neyv Elementary School "Y" New Elementary School "W" (O essa) (Wesley Chapel) New Elementary School "Z" (Wesley Chapel) New Elementary School "B" (Wesley Chapel) New Elementary School "C" (Wesley Chapel) Schedule of Capital Outlay Projects (Year 11,thru 20) West Pasco Central Pasco East Pasco New Elementary School "Q" New Elementary School "E" New Elementary School "F" (West Central County) (Land O' Lakes) (Wesley Chapel) Ne'w Elementary School "D" New Elementary School "G" New Middle School "II" (Odessa) (Land O' Lakes) (Wesley Chapel) New Middle School "JJ" New Elementary School "I" (Land New Elementary School "H" (Odessa) O' Lakes) (Wesley Chapel) New Elementary School "L" New Elementary School "M" New Middle School "KK"(Wesley' (Trinity) (Land O' Lakes) Chapel) New Middle School "NN"(West New Elementary School "1 P" New High School "HHH"(Wesley County) (Land O' Lakes) Chapel) New Middle School "OO"(West New Elementary School "J" County) (Wesley Chapel) New Elementary School "1 R" New Middle School "LL" (Wesley. (West Central County) Chapel) New Elementary School "1S" I New High School "III" (Wesley (.Trinity) Chapel) New Elementary School "K" (Wesley Chapel) New Elementary School "N" (Wesley Chapel) • New Elementary School "1O" (Wesley Chapel) New Middle School "MM" (Wesley Chapel) New Elementary School "IQ" (Wesley Chapel) New Middle School "PP"(Wesley Chapel) • • New High School "LLL"(Wesley Chapel) . , City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-22 I . N • 4 iN o x � O O v p - - - - - i - - - - - - - I - - — - - - - • n O 3 N N 3 W N N N N N W N A N W N Qn n 1 t (n k:. N 1 V J .mss t7 Cl ^J V C) (31 V I-J C) Vl +1 C) Fi, (�+s-,. M U7 m fi7 F* C (.7( C) N CI N C) -J NJ (71N L*, �,,..II a) V (J Cl C) C) NJ 0 Cl N L), m Cl (V Cl (71 A (ii N O N CC) ) J'+ .N .G (C F+ ('3 INJ 41 N N 4 O .p O) Cl 3y U'J V CL) rn O C) .G Cl d 4 CO ti, C) O) ) (T (i C Cl . V C) .71 0) I (a 0 LT (0 A VQ) (n C -4 " ' r C WA N C7D 71 d ClO C) Ci ) !.C, N (t1 Ca w r0 (0 +J) ( S-J tQ J) O) 0) .+•• V m "c LV Co N G) N (71 V N N C) C) W A CJ', L -J C. Cl C)') Ln W Sn c:J Ni A. C) Ui • iN• �I rn . s.4 -J -J rn rn m -J J r (.1 1 ti -1 r) .J V m Cl J >) a) a) A �p; d O N Q3 AJ 4ti V N ,h N CJi W 4') Ch P,J O m V O d Ch I N U', (n O CD rx �, N 7i �:- Cn W cl N G) A iz. {# C•A in N N Ja rA N CJ C! C? U) 4') iin^ V +.D +�-3.- 3 (D co na sP w e -J o •0 (s ro B :n v m L�J ( c, cn i o o 0 0 tQ z p CC• tiS o +e a 4'+ O Co ? tin `° a o L� Qn a a 6u (.n° a C3 4• -o O '� k O V N N CC1 Ln CAL, N d 4 mA O a m V m reV) V UJ ri, `� it +fin 4J — SNJSIW N to 0( C) m +.n C) (1 rn %0 Q O rn N +A W sn 71 ) c O tj CJ•J N G7 N tiJ V W A `•1 fn T t,a 471 17`r V O a, C1 N CPC (ri Ca Ps= C,. ry N U'I A tt, N q N Cn .7) A A iD N N A D N O fJ tl7 O) A tL V cb _ 'I N � W i o f!s o o ta (fin (fir j 4N^ y(D N ° 4 C7) CT, w Gn m -) a Cn SC (JI d :,) W U, V CT cn y c`a C] �( , A V SS) -•+ C)Y (7) , ". N 3 LU O iT N ZT W CG 1.) U 01 (' I A P, (11 ('30) FJ '� A A .F. Ail A N N C. N O 0) 010) 0)4) d) C. (0 W (I 01 (71 �I ue x? 'g^^: n r3 d? A a� `�° �o .\° d' r .."°. `^'- 80. ao a� do a? 3= d'• 3'• 8° t T ca" 6) (7l V -' C1, CI ,7) O) [T "' C. Cb LT) V CT, m '•J 4l, - V C. -•J Cl --ryJ N I • • fN ! 6) J Cl A 1 N ro O CJ N A CSf K7 N V rJ W W S�fl F4 J tr (0 NJ G d ® I N (31 .A (y, N © N 4') C() J+ A A tP C. N N.)N A to N G7 A Cal V U'+• .G +•� c ..9 N G �e ° n ° -° G 4w, oa G V yG+.,v c .3s o C'7 ;a o �s ([1 '"� d^ 4 °� O^ P°` p^ p°. v• p O a•4 G 7i•^ I ` G"' V O� O v- 6.. G' �.^ d^ a: C^ p C� O') V �J M V C) C() O (J) ,-', `J I M T J CI5 CAS) V M -4 ~ N LT1 tD a L)'! p 'V N y Ci9 N U La W , C37 CJ �.? t7) U, is �, N C?, t)D (TI 0 l,� O) L+) d Jy ±!, N CO CD )aJ N Lh v, b 41 Q7 (5) I '� -•J V 0) u-) rn V V Ln L+1 Cl -a V 0) wJ V Co m m (h ti n cn m C. yyam�,+ © C. N C) N G) V N Ui V d)1 ( e7) IO) I 1) V C_) Cr) r� ) N (71 Ul. Ct) VI N L:) A L)', N O N LT q7 A Y:: A iL NJ N A S>l N J:. V tl Cs 7) (C CT, .a G`.! Li, '� A J —) Cd CL, CP L, CO W W W ! b ..s F5 r� w. p"Q O� G" t)� 4', O 9^ 9 O`+ +�' Q4w y ° �` �" A' G" O" P v •i`^ Q` P P q 15:., 'ws' it co )^W bit }c 19 ti£ id OL6L >18 210 • OR BK 7970 PG 835 82 of 114 - --- ---I I I ::M";. Ue $• �4 nS� `�-� y, tl SD a C',3 1+ 4d tLf f,L a © N fV N '-.�' N h i CF M N:IF, R r 4 iJ O tJ Cf C5 tl fA o - IC tD N tJ iF ^? LD 4C7 CD i N lD M ;"" 1 h• ` f��T is `a� v M �S`, c~n `r�. G7 'z�r*'; M Q cF Ln a: ,n cn f� Cri: 0ro s s LA as -<Dy fM f+F CA E0.+ V o CN A'N m; O: • YC `T P", 4 p r Cv M V M N€Lly ti t+ it p °ke!\7aad tN � r=• cn ce w, r. u, w, u� Iri:t� r w s 'z, u, eL �� ti' c �-. OF' - 1lflry C+. cD '4 m h- W CL^ 09 fX^ •.T L{ 4 t,C7 [+1 f� C'tlCpl 117 r- L7 W J �.C tl C, C7 C1 G7 C� L7 0 cl z„�a f0 dg q O) a C+ICJ C7 tri N CC N N:N CS N- t5 0 �•.. f/) �^ 111 lt". N r i h.. N h— ,.< r` CF rn R I!J C7 cF r+ h. a}li Cs; [X7 4S1 t~ t7 C lie c F1 N CE p N, '� ky C7 iS Kt A ets p E Gri d0 d O M N h [xF r N t+", CCS f+ N[I.f'i r•. M1. G3 U7tl !8 C? C5 C'3 th CS C3 CS t� G'? O a çO �� r � u� 1? � r. In ca re �; � cn w s x, st r•* � � '' ci r o a 3�- e e` ti 'o• oC e e u GLs n� 4 w" tl G1 C'5 c'"i : d by � (I) I t� V I �°a ncVI r9 ((FF - I•- p [L"1 4? htl- C+i�� I 1— sal r Lam. 0S o1 0) 0) 0) cP r O) 0] N rtVL N CVL Cl); r uy o (0 rn r e9 0) r* rx, x +er 0) C) - - - — - — ---- — E LI '� ' 11.i Cfi [A Cn C!, UJ CJS Vi fn CJ M€i^ 11J U.d lI..I W l�° W W J�7 W l�1 11.1 W lM M I II OR BK 7970 PG 83 of 114 co p �p 4� O� '6` b� Q G,^, O e� � 'p . c? p7 aR +eh C"'j eX C3 a Ch r Ui Cb td7 �n CS7 cri cn r oa � r' r t= w r r r. �r r "m m as rte. c u; �ry ei csS` • I, M a3 J r p a' to rn g m o o d r, N I' ghCz a, a rya �" €� m c ` LO Q a. ca ""� `° � m � rs Rryrya Cwt O 40 �1^ �t N � q � � � � Y�, O FJJJJJ- L r - � r '- O•ux �' r �-� im ,a n ray U r co d K Sih f0 I I a R w I o II OR BK 7970 PG 337 84 of 114 x M . hr py c.4 Nr �Z v `�'�'� �.. �� as err r � ao r.?, as �, a!- d� �� �o„ � r� r- cfi iii i N u� a 2 n r7 tr r v en r J . `� a o En ti m a s c� o a"a to ca 1. TH ; ; j Driijii � to es� rza � �'+ us a� � as -^• e*z � �' � CF? S w r u� ro r� i� r`� o r o �• ar m pp M E37 h» k� 4TY �3 1V CA � io*� as140 t"Lq '- O'J Q tR'f ffix2„ idt lfl F+ e�7 L1 fi7 �. M " cf7 �Q� Q. 3 J 4O {cfit7 '�7 .8p9 .' tom` [ t7. Ytl N C-s, Fes;, I ry ry } to N � n ca Cl) � � as .� �-s � en en zr ..,. ___ ae n� Y. (i cry r m ui rw as is ra r u`, I xa (U 1vn !' 3 �1 k{3 C`t N- I. � �' ti c^l lei Oa rSa CC! 6L< t°•t K3 ff.y' i�.T a�F *.f Cd 'KY cv 4(1 eV ca csa m v r e -s rr s} e4 eX eT' t35 4 !d £Y'd U? 1FF h '�' 3 f7 UT t° �.• i $ "n a I E a 55 (3S2O jO c en w w u} of w w !9 a oA O .W ro ' ro v m as cr c g uln o cs c can t 91 z 5 .A C7 a xn l V) I ! Th OR BK 7970 PG 838 85 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 Public School Facility Summary School utilization was determined for each school for the 2008/09-2012/13 planning period. Tables PSF 21, PSF 22`andd PSF 23 display utilization expected for elementary; middle and high schools through the five-year planning period. By the end,of the planning period, the middle schools and the high schools will have utilization rates that will enable the achievement of the adopted level of service for the School Co currency Service Areas (SCSAs) of their respective school types. Only the elementary school SCS;A 2 will not have met the adopted levels of service at the end of the five-year planning period. However, as is described later in this Report, the elementary school SCSA 2 will be subject to a long-term concurrency management program. Thi City and the School District will continue to work in collaboration to address school capacity and site needs in conjunction with residential development trends Elementary The level of service for elementary school SCSAs is 15 percent of permanent Sc ools FISH capacity. There are currently 43 elementary schools in Pasco County. Table PSf 21 displays the utilization rates'for each school from the current year through the planning period. Reviewing utilization rates per school and the level of service by SCSA, all elementary school SCSAs at the end of the five-year planning period are projected to be 11.1 percent. Pasco County Schools has established a long-term concurrency management system to meet the adopted level of service standard for SCSI 2,which does not meet the adopted level of service standard. This allows the District additional time to meet the adopted level of service standard for elementary schools. The long-term concurrency management system is explained i greater detail in a later section of this Report. Middle Middle school SCSAs are recommended to have a level of service of 115 Schools percent of permanent FISH capacity! There are currently 14 middle schools in operation, as shown in Table PSF22 In reviewing both utilization rates per school, and the level of service of grouped schools by SCSA, seven will have utilization rates above 100 percent in SY 2008/09. By the end of the planning period in SY 2012/13, one middle school will have been added, but the overall utilization rate for middle schools will increase from 96 percent to 111 percent, still within the level of service standard for middle school SCSAs. High The level of service standard for the two high school SCSAs in Pasco County is Sc iools 105 percent of permanent FISH capacity. Two high schools will be added over the course of the planning period, contributing to the overall reduction in utilization for high schools from 111 percent to 104 percent, which iswithin the adopted level of service standard for high school SCSAs. Over the course of the planning period, high schools will experience the greatest reduction in utilization among the three school types. There are 11 high schools within the County, and only two of those currently have a utilization rate of less than 100 percent. Table PSF 23 displays the utilization rates for high schools within Pasco County. City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-27 I i OR ax 7970 Pc 839 al 86 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 Other Though not subject to concurrency, here are four other schools within Pasco Sc ools County that offer curricula for any student in Pasco County, on a countywide basis. The three education centers and one technical center provide alternatives to the traditional three school levels (elementary, middle, high). These schools' . utilization rates are displayed in Table PS-F 23 as ratios of enrollment to capacity, but they are not factored into County level of service calculations for. SCSAs. Enrollments for these schools are based on the number of students who need their services. IV. Other Public School Facilities Planning Issues 'Co-Location and Shared-Use Analysis Co location and shared use of community facilities are important to local governments and the School District for the fiscal and community buildi 1 g advantages they convey The City will consider opportunities for co location and shared use of facilities, asweilas;theme,cr�atrom of community focal points fithrough these facilities, when updating the Comprehensive Plan and planning for new, expanded or renovated community facilities. The School District also will explore these opportunities when preparing its Educational Plant Survey. In 2002, Pasco County conducted the Feasib►lity,Study for the Co-Location of Schools, Parks, and Libraries in Pasco County (1nclued wm the Exhibits section of thisr element). The study determined the feasibility of co-location opportunities through the development of criteria based on existing conditions and future siting needs. The study was a precursor to a master plan for siting community facilities including schools, parks and libraries. The potential co-location of several schools within parks, libraries and other facilities were idehtified Figure PSF,.5 shows the possible co-location sites within East Pasco and IVfap PSF 1 an AppendiX C displays co-location opportunities co l ntywide. The study acknowledges that the decision to co-locate must ultimately. be based on efficiencies and safety. Coordination for co- { location will be ongoing and addressed as opportunities and needs arise. Development Opportunity Co-location is intended to provide efficient use of existing infrastructure and create opportunities for schools to serve as community focal apoints. Identification early in a budget cycle and coordination among agencies will promote successful and effectively utilized public facilities. Coast effective co-location or joint use of School District or local government owned property could provide substantial savings for public facilities for existing and future,facilities. Additionally, School concurrency can provide oppiortunities' to consider proportionate share op�ions for the School District, local governments and developers, and may include parks and librlaries near a planned public school. M tual Use Agreements Fo each instance of co-location and opportunity for TMa school to serve as afocal ;point, fo a cc imuni through shared' use, the School Board and local government shall enter into a City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-28 . OR BK 7970 PG 840 87 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 separate mutual use agreement addressing legal liability, operating and maintenance costs, the scheduling needs of each party involved in the agreement, facility supervision and any other issues that may arise from co-location and joint use o pportunities. Figure PSF-5 Overlay for Co-location Criteria East Pasco County _ f .i �f ryFi�•�'i./i y 't/�✓✓rid l/ I . ��.� .. -: .? , '�'//'%� -`/G� 'r%'✓✓✓fir✓%``/ s ., j .. •i- - a :_ .,� }r ...{...,. �✓"'"rte f✓///F��✓/��i'�✓� , F :.__ :.'3,. _.. s - .'r»'.-.Y✓// ,✓.✓. fir 1 0 1 2 Mlles / /, r• ic• y ", /�✓ 11 M'� i.1 NiDF aY.su(/,z S p F t j(�✓/ /5. •ti� 1 � ' .-,. -fir Elementary;School Middle School Existing Parks Proposed'fatir$ries "" DRIlMPUD High Sct}oal. OLherS chool �P_ �posed Perks EXlsting lIbrnrles' �,x/f F W ,� S wer Force Mean- i " `" ��„+"Sewer Force Main-Puturc: ,! r Water Maln Future Pnhlir_.Owned Wetlende Flood Haza,l Area .::.�"S�wer Or-aii Lan[IS �' WateRMain-Raw City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-29 I i I I �I OR BI( 7970 PG 841 88 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 IV. Plan to Meet Needs The ability to achieve and maintain adopted level of service standards for public school facilities must be based on the financially feasible School District Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. The School District reviews its capital needs on an on-going basis via the Capital Improvement Plan. School capacity is added in accordance with the annually adopted financially feasible Five-Year Capital Plan (short-term) and the long-term planning period (10 and 20 years). The School District Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan demonstrates that the adopted level of service standards will not be exceeded within each SCSA for the five-year period. School District Five-Year Tentative Facilities Work Program The School District Five-Year Tentative Facilities Work Program is the foundation of an annual { pla ning process that allows the District to effectively address changing enrollment patterns, development and growth. It-is updated and adopted on an annual basis, and provides details of dis{rict-wide capital' improvement' needs, funding availability and a proposed schedule for addressing the improvements. Identified in the Five-Year Tentative Facilities Work Program are proposed capital projects needed to address existing and projected school facility capacity needs. The School District Five-Year Capital Improvement Program is an expansion and reformatting of the State mandated Five-Year Tentative Facilities Work Program. The goal of the Capital Improvement Plan is to encourage community support and understanding, and ultimately to assure public • accountability through azfinanciatly feasibl LP1i.!Plan tee adopted leei'a#service standard for the end of the five year periodandfhe bong termplarning pe�rod The School District Capital Improvements Plan must be adopted on annually basis into the Capital.Improvements Element of local government comprehensive plans..The School District Capital Improvements' Plan serves as the required financially feasible plan and demonstrates ho the School District will achieve and maintain the adopted level of service standards for public schobl.facilities. T ble PS.F24 provides a listing of the capacity projects in the School District Capital Improvements Plan, adopted September 2007. The listing indicates the schedule for capital { • ' outlay projects and expenditures necessary to ensure the availability of satisfactory classrooms for the projected student enrollment for each school.for the five-year planning period. Table • PSF-22 provides project descriptions of major renovations, remodeling projects and additions of capital outlay projects that do not add capacity to schools. 1 _____________ City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF!30 OR SK 7970 PG 842 S9 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 Table PSF-24 Five-Year Capacity Project Schedule,2007/08—2011/12 Pasco County Sclhool District Elementary Not Planned $21,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $21,500,000 es IR Specified Cost Student Stations 762 0 I 0 0 0 762 , Total Classrooms 40 0 0 0 0 40 Gross S .Ft. 112,903 0 i 0 0 0 112,903 Elementary Not Not Planned $21,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $21,500,000 Yes V Specified Cost Student Stations 762 0 0 0 0 762 Total Classrooms 40 0 0 0 0 40 £, Gross S .Ft. 112,903 0 0 0 0 112,903 Classroom San Planned $2,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,200,000 Yes Wing Antonio Cost Elem Student Stations 144 0 0 0 0 144 Total Classrooms 8 0 0 0 0 8 Gross Sq.Ft. 10,672 0 I 0 0 0 10,672 Classroom Richey Planned $2,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,200,000 Yes Wing Elem Cost Student Stations 144 0 0 0 0 144 ' xaa 4 3's Total Classrooms 8 0 0 0 0 8 Gross Sq.Ft. 10,672 0 0 0 0 10,672 Classroom Zephyrhills Planned $0 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $3,000,000 Yes Wing High Cost Student Stations 0 0 , 200 0 0 200 Total Classrooms 0 0 8 0 0 8 Gross S .Ft. 0 0 13,000 0 0 13,000 High Not Planned $2,000,000 $14,500,000 $30,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 $56,500,500 Yes School Specified Cost EEE Student Stations 0 1,909 0 0 0 1,909 �x Total Classrooms 0 76 0 0 0 76 �< Gross S .Ft. 0 282,999 0 0 0 282,999 Classroom Pasco Planned $2,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,200,000 Yes Wing High Cost Student Stations 200 0 0 0 0 200 Total Classrooms 8 0 0 0 0 8 �a Gross Sq.Ft. 13,000 0 0 0 0 13,000 �a High Not Planned $0 $0 $0 $20,605,037 $37,259,000 $57,864,037 Yes School Specified Cost GGG Student Stations 0 0 ! 0 0 1,909 1,909 Total Classrooms 0 0 0 0 76 76 Gross Sq.Ft 0 0 0 0 282,999 282,999 v�'s�"�,,. u,� "C.t`,:; ^.wa?• .;-.< 't";"'4.+� :. ,.c.. ., ..�,. Y n z y �i*.. x '«.fir;:....., ��7r s. _ x-_°:'3•.':z :ac�x.s.. i3";^x.,....:` Planed Cost: $51,600,000 $14,500,000 $33,000,000 $30,605,037 $37,259,000 $166,964,037 Student Stations: 2,012 0 I 2,109 0 1,909 6,030 Total Classrooms: 104 0 84 0 76 264 Gross Sq.Ft. 260,150 0 295,999 0 282,999 839,148 SOURCE: Pasco County School District Work Plan,2007-2008., City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF 31 ' i OR BK 7970 PG 843 90 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 Table PSF-25 Five-Year Other Project Schedule, 2007/08—2011/12 Pasco County School District nn 6 Fitt i�t+ #+E x�y1 r 7€ oi oi ' 'i ,'. 111.v.... ( �-*. ..,xi17�,f .� fit MY1 slP Tit Addgi rt cin[T t 1 ?'a iao t 2 A;DM NI:STRATTOE4 SO 1300.5 S M.0 530O STY fi T.� GiG t NO 2 131;?ILDIrt 3ttn F ufltt t k Fli i e 2 Irtation W.sT3r6±r SO 5-₹..3�.O0U SL5ITQoflfl SD 51 , '0OTY Flt t` '2 SAT J[TERS?i 1.� .f IAt_ SO SO Sat "166,]TT ate SO )2 1OOTTT tt a ELEt? 4 a.AZ'te E3strrrit iy Scns�cl O-Design W-alinn mt e ifed 50 SO SO SD S1I:V..0O,000 S t D X DOD tea I.tcsd rr atm:sr SZXa MTDDIE 50 £3>T 1;T00U ��(l SD SO yL"O0,'tal3tl ( �, Rta tlTlraTkt 91lnrleritzef e e d a` rJ}SEt tCJ4 -iUC 50 ttY't]0[] StY So so S x'G'D0D r RE plOiahTlt J��, (�((, 1 n ry yyy y 5 n.AN DER V x 15'am53OO $5'O 00pga 'A' "iJ:YxY,tY2.1. 50 - 50 �.1 i .D2S Yes C'�Ic��ierc≥�.�iti���rE.nr� � •1LlEF"�tslEts :T.lAI. epiarlwamyr E t EWTAM A€t�tra��find rrctihs A�titl+li�TRATi>7 SS_,tYu QC?LI 52, SS05 50 6 7 AaE05'fifs T Ie o n M36Catr E3uildir g ADMT 4ISTRATl3Ft xr3Gl3 000 50 50 sI% _L 30ODD Yes r i ttItP i<<[E?:350 1bf 4€l tt LO Atom riot w 1 8I 20 So SrS2D 2T434TO fes J L tc?e�t 7.1=Io1Grrtk 5 Middks SOmE rnd fins 5 Sr 7,P.0f S 7, IO OOO $a2 TYOIY 55 5105T00 555 f�27 i00 SOURCE: Pasco County School District Work Plan,2007-2008. School District 10 and 20-Year Plans Sc ooI District long range plans include capital projects scheduled beyond the five years covered by the School District Capital Improvements Plan. Table PSF*26 lists the schedule for capital outlay projects projected to ensure the, availability of satisfactory student stations for the projected student enrollment for years 6-10. The capital budget, consistent with and supportin I the long-term management system;will be amended annually.The schedule Df capital outlay protects projected to ensure; they availability`of satisfactory student stations for the projected stutlen# enrollment in K12 programs for the ten-year term and long range plan are displayed in tables PSF 27 and PSF 28 below. a _ City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-32 OR BK 7970 pG 844 91 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 Table PSF-26 Ten-Year Capacity Improvement Costs,2011/12—2016/17 • Pasco County School District Prc pct reaioncmrrntnity.Qudn3ntor other 2011 201212016 2017 general lrkcpr, • Protected G ' Elneintary O l Judson Area ! 2 �W, li Elr;r»sntaryS Odessa Area $21,500,000 Elenentary T North Cephyrhills Area 1,5t)0,OCr EI7 ientarg U Wesley Chapel Area $22,DOU,001 Elnianbry1,' Wesley ChapelWiregrassRaanch $2 ,Q0(J,00Q ElenrntaryY Odessa Starkey Ranch $24,000,000 Elerrrentary Z North Wesley Chapel Curley load $22,000,00 Elan-entaryA. North Land 9'Lakes Hwy 41 Corridor ≥x,000,001 Elementary B t<R+c sl%r Chapel Chancey Road 2,l1Eltl,00 � I Elementary C Wesley Chapel W'i iregrass Ranch $24,000,9000 I i tv 1d1e GG North Land t'Lakes Connercan D,000 tJ00 Huh GGG Wesley Chapel Old.Pasco lid $40,000,00 $312,500,0tl SOURCE: Pasco County School District Work Plan,2007-2008.1 R I ti City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-33 i I OR BK 7970 PG 845 92 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 Table PSF-27 20-Year Capacity Improvement Costs,2016/17—2026/27 Pasco County School District Project Laal;or,+Gomnunty r.,lu3zlrsht t cther 2tt15 201?a 2026 g8[12r1 location Ptthed cost Elementary Schad"Q" Area 3-West $32 003,0D( EI'mentarr Schap "I3 Area 5-Starkey Ranch X32€00J0 0 Elannentary Schwa:"E" Area 6-Connerton 3?003030 Elementary Sch s°'l= Area 7-Wesley Chapel X32 D000 Miidla School"JJ"- Area I-Starkey Ranch 74t]03Q33 n � Middle School"]l" Area 3-/Wesley Chapel W4,0033,UUL) El rrrentary Scher:"C" Area 6-8e4e I Ranch 4.0[r3.0 0• El�rnentary School"H' Area 7-Wesle Chapel ' .000, 0 Mid&School°xlc Area 3-Wesley Chapel S77,D03,0DL) Hiih Schaal'HHK Area 2- hady'.Hills v92,003,t1D0 i I Elementary Schoo"I" Area 6-Land O Lakes 34,003,00 Elin�enLarjSehoci„J" Area 7-WP.Apy Chapel mitt I1C13,Q0t4 Mkddia School"LU Area 3-AeVesle4y Chapel S79,U0J,U0 I-(i h School'?{l" Area 4-Two givers 54.000.000 ElIernentarySclr:oi'.K' Area 7- hi'esl�y Chapel 3003C0D: 1 E ernantary Scho "U' Area 5-Trinity 38,000,0{/0'� • E e nentary Schoch"M" Area G-Land b'Lakes 5x003,06 SOURCE: Pasco County School District Work Plan,2007-2008 City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan - Page PSF!34 i i OR BK 7970 PG 846 93 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 Table PSF-28 20-Year Maintenance Costs, 2011/12-2016117 Pasco County School District 1 4 c i 4 a ''2�- 3 �Ocs S i` c 4 s roj�crs� ��� g � �,Lor.dtranR�onrrau�����rtrane;crrvtller, a � 2016-2017f2Q26�2427�general " s Projected�`i�5t h�F c ors Erman₹ary Schoo;"N Area 7-Wesley Chapel 3 ,[1rjD,t14L El rnentar,r School"'l0'" Area 7-Wesley Chapel S3lntlLr 1lU[l Middle Schonl"MM Area 3-Wesley;Chapel 583.000.0013 ELementari Schevul='.F P" Area 6-Land 0'Lakes S37,000,000 EI mentary School l Area 7-Wesley Chapel 37.000,0 Etsmentary-Schaal',1R" Area 3-:Vest Pasco 538,0€0,000 Elrmeratary School"IS"' Area 5-T rn#y 538 OO,0l10 Middle School"hJ>`f' Area f- Vest Pasco. SS1 7,000,000 Middle School"00" Area 3- 1`esle}*Chapel 559,000,000 High School"LLU Area 3.-VvWesley Chapel $105,000,800 Middle School"PP" Area 3-Wesle}Chapel $89,000,000 1, /„000,000 SOURCE: Pasco County School District Work Plan,2007-2008. Revenue Sources The School District is responsible for funding the capital needs of public schools in Pasco County. The School District utilizes a variety of State and local revenue sources to provide for capital needs. Local funding sources may include Imillage (maximum 2-mil local property tax), school impact fees, Certificates of Participation (COPs), which do not require voter approval, sl ort term loans, voter-approved General Obligation Bonds and sales tax revenue. In addition to the local funding sources, the School District seeks the maximum available state funding provided through Public Education and Capital Outlay (PECO) funds and other state revenue sources such as Capital Outlay and Debt Service (CO & DS) and Class Size Reduction (CSR) appropriations. State capital outlay funding sources are derived from Motor Vehicle License Tax revenue, CO, DS and gross receipts tax revenue from utilities (PECO). However, State funds represent less than 10 percent of the School District's capital needs. City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-35 • Oa BK 7970 PG 847 94 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 The mandate for smaller class sizes has resulted in;the availability of additional state funding. Techniques that help reduce the need for additional permanent student stations include • accieptable school capacity levels, redistricting, busing, year-round.schools, charter schools, magnet schools, public-private partnerships, multi-track scheduling, grade level organization, • block scheduling or other alternatives. The School District has reduced the need for permanent student stations in the past by approving charter schools. The School District approved the expansion of one high school, adding eight hybrid classrooms and 200 permanent student stations. Also, students in grades 11 and 12 may enroll full-time in dual credit college courses. Table PSF-29 Total Revenues for Pasco County Schools,2007/08—2011/12 Pasco County School District • 2O 9—ZCrt► It 2 11 ,2 91 2th rat try vctu 'Var o , octod E tE � jocte � 1 oject d a Projectetf. ..._ ..� _..., ,, . .._ .. ter. Cla eroomsforKids S37,d u 5O SO 50 se Proceeds front a s.101 1.1 /15 F.S.Loans SO SO 5) 50, 5jtir District Qonds-Voted tool bond z 50 50 50 00 referendum pracr sins#or s.c9.AttVf E I State Constitution Proceeds from SF€.ciai Act Sends 53 50 50 So sa Estimated Revenueffrom CO&DS Bond si50 50 50 50 Sale Pr'cegds from Vrted C apital 50 50 50 50 So tnrp,•overnents millaSs Dilier Revenue fcc Other Capitol Prajecfs >` ' -3 ro 50 n Prom,.from 1f cent sales surtax 50 5 53 `0 SO authorized tyvchool board Prcceeds from lace/gotifarnmental v 13 223 539,627,361 S`3 203 7≥+ 534i850,t o $36,Si2 24 y16;f57,17 3 i r inf!aslrulcture sales surtax Proceeds from C rtificales of SO 53 3] g 50 }� Particspatiart(CU "s.)Sale C>la. rooms F9rst Bond Proceeds mount SO S SO 50 5° authorized in FY 1SR7-9S EftA Index Gr3r*3 50 OO 53 50 00 4 t District Equity Hr~cognitan 50 5t} Ai Federal Grants 0 ` 53 50 So Prof ionalpshamsnditigattinn(artuel So s I 57 Got 50 50 cash revenue only,not in kind donations} lnipact fees receivsd 510OO0,*00 5450CD0 S55,^u13s5L1J 546,390,30 596,852632 S72,64_EOI32 I I Private donations 50 5 57 50 5t7 50 3rants fmrn local governments or net-for st ' s' `° 50 s E proft or3n€oatinns Interest.includingf-rctitOnfnvestrttent $3837,555 $ 50 00) 515v ,0Ei 51,500,50) 51,5-00,000 7,a56 Rt.P_nue from 60:1tds pledging pro( ids' 50 50 5`3 50 so so from t rent or 112 cent Sales Surtax FunJ Balance Carried Forward • 0341.452 $0 SO 50 50 3,547$U12 II 0l igated Fu id salaam-died F.anvard Zo sn s° sc 50 so SCI Facilities/count 50 50 :5o so Si) ≥ Subtotal 5118,991,575 540,565,351 550,622,329 552,759,455 S54,995,256 S35953886 r86 SOURCE: Pasco County School District Work Plan,2007-2008. I ' City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF;36 A p OR BK 7970 PG 848 95 of 114 • i Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 The District has the legal authority to utilize up to 1.,5 mils of the 2.0 capital tax to fund the debt service or COPs issues. In general, funding available from State and local sources, including the issuance of long-term debt and the continuation of school impact fees, will be evaluated annually to determine the financially feasibility of the capital plan in order to meet the long-term concurrency management plan of the District. Table PSF-30 Total Revenues Summary, 2007/08-2011/12 Pasco County School District ' tame 2007 2uJ 2OD8 2J09 X13 i0 X01(3 X011 2 'l1 C12 Fi Ya r Tatal 6.id S`t 4 IL?Odr-t.',< �,P1q ctC$,l�� ..o3�io ct2C1�...M. t t`.f'r��ected Y Local Two:fill E csal:onary Capital $42,363,39$3 544,452,25', S46,7 ,15T 549,c41,496 S51,4M.,5T1 $234,087�2a Otayiue MalintenanceExpeniitures ($30.211,C12) (S 5,7a6,U00) i (S1T,8S 90 (s1 4U,9:+ ) Tb324. iS10153 ,#9)3 2'1411O'th9rEligible Expanc tur (580.385,396) "55$,7$Ule) (S5D.127,29 S275.63i.i53) PECO Maint n ceExperedit..ucz (1,1,25'_116} (S3,4ZZ4Des (3.,0&6,3„8} {S352,'Og) (S5DO,3 Q) ;St 6,82,4 k2 P CO Maintenance Re'enu 3255,45 4.3CS2,404 S2939,C4& $2, &z,7D3 32 ;745 $13ry6Z,821 ($4R212,E20) ($28,092;.933) t$21.255,O931 (524,543,1'19} ($20,&13,752) ($143.197,41T} Il m (1L7± 2(� �[33R 12009 09 2?l£7 2010 D ii ` 2011 7[}12 h Y r tat . _. .., Back ` E?rosct$ ..,Pjqectsi �€ _. :₹'ca}eded ' �i'ro# oed. CO&GS Revenue 23 ! 5553,32E $3563,328 SSS3,323 $2,7€5 540 CO N84\"Gunetni(ion SRe er1U 555,T95,24T $1,33&:23 51,913,455 32,205:363 y2524;163 523,x569,445 01 erdodditicnal Revenue 3 (8,930,575 18,531x,313( 550, 22,22f 552,759x65 S t, 258 S 29S5 Subtotal $135,340,120 S50,369.S26 $63,059,016 $55,618,156 558,472752 $35Z39,92 Grand Total $67,127,600 $22366,995 $31,833,923 330,505,037 $37,259,000 .: $209,192,.555 i I l I SOURCE: Pasco County School District Work Plan,2007-2008. it Table PSFw 31 is a general summary of the School District's planned capital expenditures and revenues for new construction and remodeling projects only over the five year period from 2007/08-2011/12. The total revenues and expenditures over the five year planning period total o' er $209 million. The School District's Five-Year Capital Improvements Plan demonstrates financial feasibility, as the total costs do not exceed the total revenues in each year, as well as over the five year planning period. City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF!37 OR BK 7970 PG 849 96 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 Table PSF-31 Summary of Revenue/Expenditures Available for New Construction &Remodeling Projects Pasco County Revenue/ 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 . 2010-2011 2011-2012 Five-Year Expenditure $ $ $ $ $ Total $ ToReval enues 87,127,600 22,366,995 31,833,923 30,605,037 37,259,000 209,192,555 Total Project (87,127,600) (22,366,995) (31,833,923) (30,605,037) (37,259,000) (209,192,555) Costs Ren aining Fuds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Souce: Pasco County School District Work Plan,2007-2008. Interlocal Agreement for School Planning The implementation-of the Public School Facilities ;Element involves numerous activities, the most extensive of which is the implementation of the Interlocal Agreement for Coordination of Planning Activities, as amended (see Exhibits section of this element). The Interlocal Agreement between the School District and the local governments for coordinated planning and development of public school facilities demonstrates a commitment by all parties to work together toward resolving needs. The Interlocal Agreement provides the foundation for successful coordination for the co-location for schools, parks and libraries, including the desirability of using existing and planned elementary schools for neighborhood parks. Debt Service Obligations ` outstanding bond issues is $195,532,804. The projection of debt service obligations for currently g At the end of the five-year period: (2011 2012), the School Board has a debt capacity of $72,925,130, assuming 0 percent growth, $131,479,122, assuming a 2.5 percent growth rate;+ and is $180,446,660, assuming 5 percent growth rate` Cost Sharing for Infrastructure Needs Coordination for school planning between local governments and the District will improve the ti efficiency of site selection and construction of new schools. For example, an affected local government may participate in the District's site review to jointly determine needs for and timing of on-site and off-site improvements for a new school. Student growth projections may indicate future need for land acquisition for schools when it is available at a reasonable cost. The School District's protected student growth requires the School Board"toobtain land for future use when it is available at a reasonable cost and plan for school and infrastructure construction whent school capacity is needed proximate to residential development Analyzing the infrastructure needs of planned school sites is necessary, consistent with the Interlocal Agreement, xas amended. With this process, shared funding for capital improvements for school sites can be determined according to the responsibility of each party for each specific school site, projected impacts, and benefits derived to each party for each specific school site. An affected focal government may; coordinate with District staff to perform its own technical= review of a site, allowing joint determination of needs and timing for on-site and.off-site improvements necessary to support City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-38 • j OR BK 7970 PG 850 0 97 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 new choo s ';Necessary infrastructure coordination may include: potable water lines, sanitary sewer lines, drainage systems, roadway improvements including turn Ianes, traffic signalization an signage, site lighting, bus stops, and sidewalks Through Gty and District coordination, school concurrency ucosts may be met and proportonatejT shared by alLaffectë& parties`. cotihistent With the Interlocal rAgreement, as ,amended, and the School 3Distnct s abil ao main am a financially feasible capitalxplan ff These improvements are assessed at the time of site plan preparation. Developer agreements II cotliid address timing and responsibility for construction, as well as operation and maintenance of required on-site and off-site improvements. Such improvements should be in keeping with the Districts financially feasible Capital Improvements Plan admust-_be consistent wifhwthe 2D08 Aniendd3lnterlocal Agreement` Other cost-effective measures could be considered by local governments in the development of ne;ghborhood plans and review of proposed large-scale residential developments. At these junctures, local governments can encourage private sector participation in meeting future school needs. Such developer participation may include land donation, site preparation, acceptance of pPp' stormwater from future school facilities into a private stormwater management system, I.' reservation or sale of school sites at pre-development prices, construction of new school facilities or renovation of existing school facilities and provision of transportation alternatives. l . iI • . • City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF'39 OR BK 7970 PG 851 98 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Prepared:August 25, 2008 u : [This page intentionally left blank.] I� II it l' I City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF 40 OR BK 7970 PG 852 99 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Adopted:August 25, 2008 VI. Goals, Objectives and. Policies Introduction Pursuant to sections 163.3180(13)(a) and 163.3177(12), FS, and Section 9J-5.025, FAC, the following represents the Public School Facilities Element Goals, Objectives and Policies of the City of Zephyrhills. These directives herein mandate a comprehensive focus.on school planning especially as it relates to planning and permitting developments that affect school capacity and utilization rates. The goal of this element is intended to establish the desired long-term end to which school planning objectives and policies of thei'community are ultimately directed. Implementation U i less otherwise stated, the implementation of objectives and policies contained in this Section shall be through the development, adoption and application of the regulations set forth in the Zephyrhills Land Development Code and the Interlocal Agreement for Coordination of Planning Activities(May 2003), as amended by the Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement adopted on June 23J200 . GOAL PSF 1 To maintain a public school system that offers a high quality educational environment, provides accessibility for all of its students and ensures adequate school capacity to accommodate enrollment demand in the City. Level of Service Standards Objective PSF 1.1 Incorporate public school facilities level of service standards for each School Concurrency Service'Area into the Concurrency Management System and coordinate with the District School Board of Pasco County to address school facility deficiencies within the period covered by the Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements and the long-term planning period. Policies PSF 1.1.1 Consistent with the Interlocal Agreement for Coordination of Planning Activities, as amended and based upon perrrianent 'c ecy asdeterrnlned by the Florida' Inventory of School Houses (FISH), the following level of service standards are established for each School Concurrency Service Area: a. Elementary schools: 115% of EFISH3 capacity b. Middle schools: 115% of FISH capacity c. High schools: '105z%o of FISH capacity cl�_Alternafive Educational Facilities:- '�70% of.�ISH capacity City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSFL41 • OR BK 7970 PG 853 100 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Adopted:August 25, 2008 P F 1.1.2 The City hereby establishes a Long Term ,Concurrency Management System based upon permanent capacity as determined by the Florida=Inventory of School Houses and as authorized m Section 163.3180( )(x), Florida Statutes within the designated' Long Term School Concurrency Management Service Area. The 10 year Long Term Concurrency Management System shall apply to, and be effective m,; Elementary School SCSA 2 Long-Term Concurrency Management Plan SCSAs2 Year Interim LeveI of Year Interim`Level;Of Service Standard ServiceStandard 2008=`2009 ;11.2%a: 2013 201`4! _25_61 2009-2010 X110%a 1 20`15 _69%` 201.0=201:1: 110% 2015 2016: 1108%0` 2011-2012 121% 2016 2017 112%' 0122013 .127%: 20.17 2018 11'1'% PSF 1.1.3` The City hereby adopts less than district-wide School Concurrency Service Areas (SCSAs) which serve as a basis to establish separate elementary school middle school and high school;SCSAs in which to measure the level of service standards. The SCSAs for elementary, middle, and high schools are set forth in the Public School Facilities Element Map Series rnAppentlix C of this Comprehensive Plan. PSF 1.1.4: The City, in conjunction with the District School Board of Pasco County and the municipalities, shall require that prior to adopting a modification to a School Concurrency Service Area (SCSA), the following standards will be met: a. The adopted level of service standards will be achieved and maintained by the end of the five-year planning period or, for any SCSAs subject to a long-term School Concurrency Management System, by the end of the ten-year planning period. b. The utilization of school capacity ;shall be maximized to the greatest extent possible, taking into account transportation costs, court approved desegregation plans and other relevant factors, but.not require the use or implementation of double sessions or a 12-month school year by the School Board. c. At such time as the School Board determines that a SCSA change is appropriate considering the above; standards, the School Board shall transmit the proposed change with supporting data and analysis to the City. d. The City shall review the proposed SCSA boundary and provide comments to the School Board. e. Any proposed change to a SCSA shall become effective upon final approval by the School Board. f The City shall prepare and adopt arnendmn#s regartlmg changes to a? CSA as£ part of the next biannual Comprehensive Plan=amendment cycle afterEehanges toga SCSA areapproved.by the$School BoardmY4 City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-42 OR BK 7970 PG 854 101 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Adopted:August 25, 2008 PSF 1.1.5. The City shall work cooperatively with the District School Board of Pasco County whenever the School Board determines the need to change the use of a school. The City shall review a requested change in use following the same procedure as established in Section 3, Interlocal Agreement for Coordination of Planning Activities. School Concurrency Review Process Objective PSF 1.2 In conjunction with the District School Board of Pasco County, develop and implement a process for concurrency review of residential development to determine if school facilities will be mailable, pursuant to the five-year and the long-term planning periods, at the adopted levels of service standards for students generated by the development. II Policies PSF 1.2.1 The City, in coordination with the District School Board of Pasco County, shall establish criteria in the Concurrency Management System for determining residential uses that are exempt from the requirements of school concurrency. t Such uses may mclude'but novt be limited to age 55 andtiovr'6 ri uities,assisted living,facilities,homeless shelters, college dorms and r onres dential developments PSF 1.2.2 The City shall require a School Impact Analysis to be submitted for residential development applications that are not iexempt from school concurrency for review by the District School Board of Pasco County. PSF 1.2.3 The District School Board of Pasco. County shall review each School Impact Analysis, in the order received, to determine whether capacity at the adopted level of service standards for each type of schools is available to support the projected students generated by the development. a. In determining the availability of school capacity, the School Board shall first review the available capacity within the directly impacted School Concurrency Service Area (SCSA). In the event that capacity is not available in the directly impacted SCSA, the SCSAs adjacent to the directly impacted SCSA shall be reviewed for available capacity at the adopted levels of service standard. If said capacity exists, a Concurrency Determination Letter shall be issued by the School Board. b. If the School Board determines that capacity at the adopted level of service standards is not available in all SCSAs reviewed, the School Board shall issue a Preliminary Concurrency Deficiency Letter and provide an opportunity for the applicant/developer to negotiate Proportionate Share Mitigation. PSF 1.2.4 The City shall coordinate with the District School Board of Pasco County during the negotiation of Proportionate Share Mitigation options with the applicant/developer and, upon reaching agreement, the City, School Board and applicant/developer City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF43 it • OR BK 7970 PG 855 102 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Adopted:August 25, 2008 shall enter into an enforceable and binding agreement as specified in the Interlocal Agreement Implementing School Concurrency. a. Any Proportionate Share Mitigation must be directed by the School Board to a school capacity project identified in; the capital improvement schedule in the District Facilities Work Program (DFWP) and in the City's Capital Improvement Element to maintain financial feasibility based upon the adopted level of service standards. If a capacity project does not exist in the DFWP, the School Board may, in its sole discretion, add a capacity.project to satisfy the impacts from a proposed residential development, as long as financial feasibility of the DFWP can be maintained. b. Proportionate Share Mitigation optio's include, but are not limited to: (i) Contribution of land for an entire school site meeting the applicable School Siting Standards or adjacent toian existing school site. (ii) Provision of additional Permanent Student Stations through the donation of buildings for use as a primary or alternative public school facility, provided that such building meets State Requirements for Educational Facilities standards and provided that such student stations are not relocatables or other temporary classrooms; (iii) Provision of additional Permanent Student Stations through the renovation of existing buildings for use as public school facilities; or (iv) Construction of Permanent Student Stations or Core Facilities; or (v) Construction of a school in advance of the time set forth in the DFWP; or (vi) Creation of mitigation banking based on the construction of a public school facility in exchange for the right to sell capacity created; or • (vii) Construction of a charter school designed in accordance with School Board standards, providing Permanent Student Stations. Use of a charter school for mitigation must include provisions for its continued existence, including but not limited to the transfer of ownership of the charter school property and/or operation of the school to the School Board; or (viii) The contribution of funds or other financial or financing initiatives acceptable to the School Board to ensure that the financial feasibility of the DFWP can be maintained by the implementation of the mitigation options; or (ix) The contribution of funds or other financial or financing initiatives acceptable to the School Board to ensure that infrastructure improvements to support a public school facility that are the obligation of the School Board will be in place when necessary. PSF 1.2.5 No later than December 1, 2008, ' the City shall amend the Concurrency Management System in the Land Development Code to include school concurrency provisions in accordance with Section) 163.3180(13)(b), Florida Statutes, and the adopted Interlocal Agreement for Coordination of Planning Activities. PSI 1 2 6 The ty shall continue to implement the Interlocal Agreement for Coo�dmation of Plarnmg Actwities among the µCity, PaseoCounty; the rnunictpahttes antl the` City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF,-44 OR BK 7970 PG 856 103 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Adopted:August 25, 2008 District School Board of Pasco County, dated May 2003, as amended from time jto time, and as f more recently revised by the kAmended and„Restated FInterlocall Agreement adopted by the City on June 23, 2008. School Capital Facilities Planning Objective PSF 1.3 No later than December 31st of each year, include in the Capital'.Improvements Element they annually updated District School Board of Pasco County Five-Year Capital° Improvements Program, orxTen-Year Capital Improvements Program` for School Concurrency Service Areas ,,.. subject to a Long Term School Concurrency Management System; which identifies the school facility capacity protects necessary to address existing deficiencies and meet futureneeds£ based u on the Fadopted levels of service standards. Po icies PSF 1.3.1 The City shall annually update and amend the Capital Improvements Element to reflect the school facilities'level of service standards and to include: the adopted District School Board of Pasco County'Five-Year Capital Improvements ;Pogra , as annually amended, which serves to achieve and maintain the adopted level of service standards for schools. PSF 1.3.2 The City shall annually update and amend the Capital Improvement Element to reflect the ten-year concurrency management system and District School Board of Pasco County's` development of a financially feasible plan to achieve and maintain the adopted level of service standards] for SCSAs that have a backlog within ten years As necessary, the City will also consider annual updates to the Public School Facilities Element based on, but not limited to, changes m enrollment and capacity data and revisions to School Concurrency Service Area maps. PSF 1.3.2 By adopting the five or ten-year capital improvement schedule of the District Facilities Work Program (DFWP) into the Capital Improvements Element, the City shall have neither obligation nor responsibility for funding the DFWP. 1?SF,1 3 3 The Ci shall coordinate the annual review of the Public,School Facilifies Element with theiSchool Board, pursuant to PSF 1 3 1 and3PSF`1 2 6 Information Sharing Objective PSF 1.4 Maximize information sharing relative.to long range planning efforts between the City and the District School Board of Pasco County, pursuant toithe Interlocal Agreement for Coordination of Planning Activities, as amended. PSF 1.4.1 By June 1 of each year, the City shall provide it's resident population projections to the District School Board of Pasco County City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF;45 OR BK 7970 PG 857 104 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Adopted:August 25, 2008 PSF 1.4.2 On an annual basis, or more frequently as deemed appropriate by the City, the Community Development Department shall provide to the District School Board of Pasco County information on growth and development trends within the City. School Facility Siting and Availability Objective PSF 1.5 Support the District School Board of Pasco Countyl in its effort to provide, locate and expand public schools in a coordinated manner that ensures planning, construction and opening of ed l rational facilities are coordinated in time and place, concurrent with necessary services and infrastructure and ensuring compatibility and consistency with the Zephyrhills Comprehensive Plan. Po icies PSF 1.5.1 Public school facilities built or school sites purchased prior to the effective date of JanuarytF 1, 200 ; shall be considered to be consistent with the existing and proposed residential areas they serve. Accordingly, nothing in this Comprehensive Plan shall be construed as creating a conflict between public school facilities built on school sites purchased prior to the effective date and the Future Land Use Map. PSF 1.5.2 The City shall coordinate with the District School Board of Pasco County to ensure that new public schools built within the City are: a. Consistent with the Future Land Use Map; b. Proximate and compatible with existing and proposed residential areas; c. Functional as community focal points; d. Co-located with other appropriate public facilities when possible; and e. Served by adequate on and off-site infrastructure. PSF 1.5.3 Public educational facilities shall be allowed in all of Future Land Use Map categories, subject to consistency with the goals, objectives and policies of this Comprehensive Plan. PSF 1.5.4 Potential school sites shall be consistent with the following school siting standards, to the extent practicable: a. The location of school sites will provide logical focal points for community activities and serve as the cornerstone for innovative urban design standards, including opportunities for shared use and co-location of community facilities; b. The location of new elementary and middle schools internal or adjacent to residential neighborhoods; c. The location of new elementary schools within reasonable walking distance of residential areas served by the schools; d. The location of new high schools on the periphery of residential neighborhoods, with access to collector and higher roads; City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-46 OR BK 7970 PG 858 105 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Adopted:August 25, 2008 e. Demonstrate with buffering plans, lwhere necessary, that the school site is compatible with present and projected uses of adjacent property; f. Opportunities for community redevelopment and revitalization, efficient use of existing infrastructure and discouraging urban sprawl; g. Safe access to and from the school site by non-motorized and motorized means, including appropriate trail, bikeway and sidewalk access to neighborhoods; h. Absence of significant environmental constraints that would preclude development of a school on the site; i. Absence of adverse impact on a rchaeological or historic sites listed in the National Register of Historic Places or designated by Pasco County and/or municipality as a locally significant historical or archaeological resource; j. The proposed site is well-drained and soils are suitable for development or are adaptable for development and outdoor educational purposes with drainage improvements; k. The proposed location is not in conflict with local government comprehensive plans, storm water management plans or watershed management plans; I. The proposed location is not within a velocity flood zone, a floodway, or the Coastal High Hazard Area, as delineated in the affected comprehensive plan; m. The proposed site can accommodate the required parking, circulation and queuing of vehicles on-site, and is not located on a non-paved road or a road that will remain non-paved after the opening of the educational facility; n. The proposed location lies outside the area regulated by Florida Statutes Section 333.03 regarding the construction of educational facilities in the vicinity of an airport. PSF 1.5.5 The City shall review development proposals for compatibility of uses adjacent to existing schools and known future school sites. PSF 1.5.6 The City shall support efforts by the District School Board of Pasco County to locate new schools within walking distance ofiresidential neighborhoods. PSF 1.5.7 The City shall support the, District School Board of Pasco County in locating appropriate school services, such as administrative offices and adult education, in alternative locations, such as but not limited to commercial plazas, shopping malls and community centers. PSF 1.5.8 The City shall coordinate with the District School Board of Pasco County to review and update site identification requirements so that areas suitable for future school sites are identified prior to changes in urban service lines, land use, zoning or approval of projects generating new students. PSF 1.5.9 Require within any developer agreement, zoning condition or development order condition that any property required to be conveyed for public services to the City may be transferred to the District School Board of Pasco County, with or without consideration except that there shall be an appropriate transfer of impact fee City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF-47 • OR BK 7970 PG 859 106 of 114 Public School Facilities Element Adopted:August 25, 2008 revenues, as applicable, to develop educational facilities, and conversely, if the School Board deems any donated property through a developer agreement, zoning condition or development order condition unsuitable for a school site, then it may transfer or lease said property to the City for any public use with or without consideration except that there shall be an appropriate transfer of impact fee revenues, as applicable. Said agreements and conditions may provide that any such properties may be transferred directly to the School.Board. PSF 1.5.10 Before disposing of surplus property, the City shall offer first right of refusal for such property to the District School Board o I Pasco County and, conversely, ,the School Board shall offer first right of refusal for surplus School Board property to the City. PSF 1:5.11 The City shall give priority consideration to land use, zoning and development • approvals in areas where school sites are adequate to serve potential growth, or have been donated or set aside for purchase by the District School Board of Pasco .County at pre-development approval prices reflected in- written . agreements approved by the School Board. PSF 1.5.12 Per direction from the Elected Officials Oversight Committee, the City shall annually update the'Public School Facilities Map Series. This map series is coordinated with • the Future Land Use Map Series and includes the planned general locations of schools and ancillary facilities for the five-year planning period. The Public School Facilities Map Series shall include at a minimum: a. A map or maps which identify existing location of public school facilities by type and existing location of ancillary plants; and • b. A-future conditions map or map series which depicts the planned general location of public school facilities and ancillary plants and.renovated facilities by year for the five year planning period, and for the end of the long-term planning period of the host county. C mmunity Design Objective PSF 1.6 E hance neighborhood livability and land use compatibility through school facility siting and • design i that reinforces the role of schools as community focal points. Policies P�F 1.6.1 The City shall require the siting of future parks, recreation and community facilities in conjunction with school sites, where feasible. PSF 1.6.2 When feasible,the City and the District School Board of Pasco County shall enter into agreements for joint-use facilities to include but not be limited to, schools, community centers, libraries and parks. City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan • Page PSF-48 �y oR BK 79 ! 0 Pr, 860 107 of 114 Public,School Facilities Element Adopted:August 25, 2008 I', . PSF 1.6.3 Upon notice from the District School Board of Pasco County of the potential to contract fora school site, the City shall promptly notify the School Board of the City's interest, if any, in joint-acquisition or co-location for other public facilities. PSF 1.6.4 The City will coordinate with the District School Board of Pasco County to encourage joint participation by privat , quasi-public and public organizations in innovative methods for delivery of community-based facilities and services in conjunction with existing and proposed school sites. P F. 1.6.5 The City shall coordinate with the District School Board of Pasco County to require that both existing and proposed school facility sites and school,bus stops within the City. are'integrated into a planned bicycle and pedestrian network of sidewalks, bikeways, trails and street crossings. PSF 1.6.6 The City shall coordinate with the District School Board of'Pasco Pasco County in the development of design standards for school bus stops'and turnarounds. P F 1.6.7 The City shall require interconnectivity of schools, parks, libraries and other.public facilities with bikeways, trails and sidewalks, where feasible. P F 1.6.8 The City shall require conveyance of land, as required by the District School Board of Pasco County, to address the impact of.residential dwelling units on the school system. PSF 1.6.9 The City shall'review development proposals for compatibility of uses adjacent to- existing schools and known future'school sites. PSF 1.6.10 The City shall coordinate with the District School Board of Pasco County in the design process for new 'or expanded schools to ensure compatibility with the traditional urban character and development pattern in Zephyrhills. PSF 1.6.11 The City shall coordinate with Pasco County, other municipalities and the District School Board of Pasco County on emergency preparedness issues which may include: a. ,'Design and/or retrofit of public schools as emergency shelters; b. Enhancing public awareness of- evacuation zones, shelter locations and evacuation routes; or c. Designation of sites other than public schools as long-term shelters, to allow schools to resume normal operations following emergency events. City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Page PSF!49 li OR BK 7970 PG 86 108 of 114 [This page intentionally left blank.] i . City of Zephyrhills 2020 Comprehensive Plan Public School Facilities Element Exhibits it sS '•¢z �`ac .C��icy 1 s x'r y��,�t�,}�a*"-.nY�'{'� 7ti}t�d. , r .. ..._ t,�r, ;i ' 'S, :5 y. ar +vy,- �s^+As i• ^"' a a 1 4 f IIERitAF7D0'C I'7CgJCT • i 1 LACUUCH£E :1 - •f ° z t E.7f {1 fJs f{I�5 nF i?4N Nir 1 RL��YY aj�1�f ,•��`, +,X 4�\ ''+�Y7ri�?r� +w,,try ,� ,+ .• s ° r 's s d? �r",�U�1'+S.�'d'j'v wii• {F°,, y�S �y 1[ IIIRNAT7IX7 C)! Y ° .. 1 i d j ' a° Yb rs ., j } 1 p abwS i't�M1 1L S3 #.7 huh�C.}fl- In II !' I SBAUY A11 LS - ! / j •t NOIiTfiTYh:5'1'HIIS GARAGE i y% ( s�[J ouyEv D.cox A HUDSON IY, ,� o ri r�4 4"rs ay`t r"7�1 Sh'�'t?`S t. ■ AIA IIY GIF.I.1 >R.A E. IASCUi NOR'f1151I' i SANANIONIU PASCUz ilUi>SOA� 1 { ■F,;� A.CCO 1 t z tlz� iu ;1 T 7C sir ; t SY ≥�< 4 Ja-,y t ; l ulraiut..tom rAz•DU ,w S GAItE - MUOTi 1.:1KE i t x ' ��:e GUI,F111411I ANUS-' S�CIIRADER ".� �} hy�R ,i{�11,f 5fi`y4 }- , NIACNTENANCE FACILITY'4 `mac �_.,a•` —... _.. } \ DAYONk7 P(119't1 a;7 Fa' IM�r ri'y rt t ahS)Ls a t ,')YOx HOLLOW M%IlNC( NTIti ` CtNf6NN1A1. t'[' e sk s k k. fi��yf�t kA fir : 't'rlIASC'D Cusco.. t C1 C.CAI. SA CYP lRESS-•.,p RIVER RIDGF; ) n - l" ,.T, '4){�1 �1#ly$57i'a'U$i'A A4E.:i A �� liANDO GAISEl QUAIL110LL05Y LF%CIIAPEL 99 RIDGEWOOD • ; s AWES .. Z6PIIYREIILLS - C� z�h S ,zS E J F IiTCIlL5' {- z WESLEY CHAPP:I.It15'ER RIDGE � t i•t+#r )''-s'� ''� }',orcr CU1F' SC1100LDOARD OFFICES 1 �,' ■A1110MS 1:.N'F:II9M N (�500UL R\D" r ' PINE\4E\Y / f i �IAlbl01,17 .'T"t"Y;ART' CO'�EF.RI\'LR J wk5'1"/.FPO11tHI1.LS N t tP SANDERS.AIE\IOIhAI. PIN£V1k:51' /urn a ; *SOUTHPASTJItJSG4,RAGE .g aGULF \ }�7£t:RPATiK J• L3 l l N£A'RI\FR � 1 AfAltl O\y$C• [< > 4r 1. i nuxrwuua I;rJ."t+.ttt, CENT'RALDUSGAKAG�' i Ct < (,fYE I.LOC"E z= Ch\ N QAKSTE�D CIIESIER 5Y.TAYIUR \"Z 'E §PRi\C 5 ( SUNLA KE IU r� z., <.> J �' I� t` pya' Yt AN'C1,07'£t ! , CIi,1R1.>:SS.Rt.Sfi£ EWNOAKS SI#NRAY - 1"-"' 'L 1NGLEAF Q rt LAKE M5'RI'LF.' f , DOW1I F nxANC.i1 C1.1 TRACE;s SEVEN SlRINCS A` \.. ■ ter., JJ I AYuRECitASS RACtI >r \ 4f � Jy,'• JATII•:S\V'.itfl'fGIIFILi t- ,.. 'r -��.` It' y I A DR.JOHN LONG Jf� 'AUI,Ii.S>if1'll 1RINITY ) . j ` A >:.. CIILFSIDE I - C:it'fRIh1--.- ---...r I 5[ LNIIA\100.FS/ • SANDFINF PItb IJ.AS.CgiJlJTY - tOLLSnOltoUGli cOUN1Y r.> ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF I ASCO COUNTY A MIDDLE SCHOOLS EXISTING SCHOOLS HIGH SCHOOLS AND ANCILLARY FACILITIES ANCILLARY FACILITIES A .MAP. 8 . 1 Yc -Y z F.�.. �"t"'1 ,;tip:�' } •�'.t„�'' "'.�.,`— G.+�J f + ;HERNAAIDO UtY � ; ....''� ,_.... ... Jl {,y1Gi�'ra 2�4t§"��'�"��''!jt ttx •'°�t�r>+��rr'4�r°i'�`a''v p�` !��� � r y } , � { �:. C.'• � 1 `°''� h\�a c x V kti�,` �` �``q`+`�} J>ExN+vNtw c<xraJx M t�� fk;.,�t4k :. a*."' F,x2 �•� " / tw s'4151svJx' -r.S i ,e,v tl,u r,{•� rl �yx Y z�r A?tit�'5Y M110(2013); � J 1. r', MI)))))F.F2(2008) F+a>4P i'.Y@ Z'a/fij, r�af{ 1pr. p r I t3 r .Y`�s?'\fit �1�'eG }kY`ply x Jr• '� '' ' �' 1 °�'t I O I 4, t r '\, 'F��,F •4; .i, a '? ' t. attmnl �m + "midi- � `{ i"' •• 3 /' _ _. ......_,U.._.,_...�b%_.__..._ ..,._..._....__ .._�..._._—... °1g. j�. fI.FAI A(2015) (� rj'`a'+r3y qa3' • f :.), '' ••,_ �Ti/ `J�y3Y r \a5= �j Ui 1�f �,i r \ ELEM It(201)9) �;1 _ F[EA1'f(2013). "''`+ j � � l 11I6t1666(2012) € C A1(D1)J,E6(1(20(7) TRANSPORTATION.@ I2 s eu k aau r -„ ..�a{'.._.. xi. 1'L(2014) {j 1 v;'(ro fit k"t d y /`_.- ( __...__.%• S1At\TENANCE(TBD) an ��. rs FLED {"�*tarro�\sl 1,e),{f#$55•tt,{x r-yg'�!-�., �f.. r DI(i)I)IF lill(2011)./ ELEDf\'(20091 v ) F- L) EL EA11(20111 + F.I.F.ASF(200(1) / ' t Ji iI L ED{S{2013) ./ ' £ ! in W(iD14) f-) w �e :'r a - 'I ! EI.EMR{"X0151 E`4 F.LEM (21,16) {I } �. } v __ �• ..,..___Li1 ..._..I r � ' �ELL'M1J D(2017) ' „ -- iu 11161)FAF(2009) iI fib_ 47 1 I E21 U(2014) z'+_. ,Q - _ -.r JRLLSBOROtJO)I COTJNTY - 1()�sl(As ccx+NTY - _ DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS OF PASCO COUNTY /:'. MIDDLE SCIIOOLS PROPOSED SCHOOLS 4 HIGI-I SCHOOLS AND ANCILLARY FACILITILS ANCILLARY FACILITIES MAP 8.'2 IV Y 1�,•ltNANU0 couirr gip, t :R?(ANtx1 CCNU+TY 7 aKk( / 1 x .a§City itilx x,$ "x� ( M1s - ). 'xJ 1, � •' ( eRaodctw tir _r .._._ t ` i Se7. 7C I A1 i.. I - z-!ti Y�'- - � '' F+ i �.. �.a r� k,t� raI J ti y � _ . J/ � t� 1. �-'____ L. y �•' .. -u 44 Y r F t {I /1; __ Ili �•i - \ .. 1 ///c C A t3 4v IIHhi.LnS i)1N IY IIILLSS0ROIJGH,COUNTY ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS PROPOSED ELEMENTARY © COUNTY LIBRARIES SCI'IOOI,BOARD PARCELS DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD A MIDDLE SCHOOLS A PROPOSED MII)DLIi COUNTY PARKS COUNTY PARCELS OF PASCO COUNTY e HIGLI SCHOOLS o PROPOSED HIGH I COUNTY PARK ACREAGE ''` MUNICIPAL PARCELS CO-LOCATION OPPORTUNITIES t��-11-_LARYFACILITIES 4 PROPOSED ANCILLARY MAP 9 . {a4 r ti"3r�Y s 37 Uiti�. `1� C�,�'� °''Lrtf#•a; f 1 ��. , A 3" s� vtl �a y Lq xt uG / a i118ttVATIUD Cd17NTY W• P4 t EI'` '��If 3 -.•i:t G 2-+e y,# Jryt 0 LACOOCIIEE r�, UEBNANI)O COUNTY y`�S t' xE4 " r t { r +y t I f \v , Sl. 3 s 1 :, s , 1 r ir '� J~`�tiYiu y..'f< ttsyvrt -;:-. - k"•.;( 1 (J SHADYIIILLSU !,(a i1-'r y r °���li e i c r l r \y I + 1 �,, t'•°—' y . sk\ s.� �"G 4g ''v,. �iri4'it\�\'l rF,,• ak'3 'rt �:.Y r'. i � + ?, r'x! �' �� tr^�4 :"/ ./ f S�'� � r r GSA IO I ,' 1, (SA t) �•w:� p34m'yd2 r S"�l� tl�r"g5r\ s 1 q � r i�::{i� 1? i•>; bfiRYICsIBi:L+�. �)ni�1 rA>₹.k t fii+J{:� 1,r'++.,r�. r x ;•,,1 a'1� t fiy�r7 nrk i,i., {y. '"Paz ?,�r.�, -Sr r1 , r IWDNEY B.COX t' 1+ xti)t�><•'.Flax"t x1} 4'`. t,. + r ( IyJ+fn+y �` "?,2 tr +t .ta? ti i :r J ,I NOIiTH1YEST °`'poi k�fsr xr X�\ ,�y,r IIUDSOR a 9aQr'`` it :`r" ✓ i r SAN#NTOMO v cU. i !'� s r . k r v,?e 3 a a �t { � d „•/�S ! F I Y � �X C) + 3 zJ n*k J v e 4 lad N `1 "' ^F a•.sE t' x d a - > rnu r r GULFIHG�IA DIOOA At C y 'P� .ti7�r� LYE is irfS.s•.. m V. h � `,+ •a i h e e ✓ / r ) 7 m`ts,�nYC`>Y v 'C3L isvr rG :w:m1:L01►S ..+,+rylf I t S 4 LSA3 f 1sG r Y �' p Nt"f(yy�J F� J L?Y'"A ry\� 1. 1 Y t L'{\1 N CHASCO `'.. 7 p.., >..c"'`j ;sSw s +, N ,,„a •,Mk0"� otr a�sr r } s k ruL:'SSf✓"'G s .n c".Tia JC r. k,;, kt;' . 45 r x w��'n �. ? "� •2Ss? CSA S '� . '1 1 ;_' '�'�':.. .k: )CYPR1 S ,...r,>:t�'.4 G "+,,.., _ --- — . U.a� �.�.r•s«F' ..,-.Ex f ,—.r;G�LU5�l?f-� rti >.. ..`r' ✓t+�' ..; �1 ,� l,;----� QUAFLHDIIOW' --- ' t •r t 9 ,F., r�, .fi t C�F •^ ua r :u. + ) x. t. I— -u 'AZ t) wCC '• ..�.'.. .".r /.ii Ct WLrSL£Y CIEAt EL 7 i p\ j lit i„F 4- S CS w. nu.x nicun I r^ //�+. �i 1,. , k r .ti J k? f.:. k r r C1 WOODLAND mar r 9 r .y{,�� 1?.);�;1�1,�ClI�.;. ,I+ff1 Y, Y � `; t , uoar : (:m}F ►'ER ,")E.tr ,re ,' ciG.i �,,f � r n a t,l\h S4:.SANDEIRS AI Ent OKI A1, t 7 r f s !, s _ IL • Aia v43.� +ti R , �r k�;. _ •} �5FST ZLPi71 Rlifl.4S<) V 1I S %MARLOR'F. BEK I'ARh y'3rT' c d�zr�i �.f3.' s �r 1 m %:. \ NEW RI BR ir3 .e .bt`4 ,{: r; '(: ss'` .n5?$vfislr; }rlry fit\r„ rk. t ,�"r PINEtIxtti r ! � I11T I.UCKC , Y t :y.Gru s5r t.a .fI ' j ,r /,' / -—i CSA$ 5 s'-'fit#.y'r✓•Ya� a" � a�A�I�SfF+lia19SL",) i.�8 1 + SEVEMOAKS r � ,'... NCI;( LONCLLAf< - .JI' .Cl/FSi ER"W TAt LOA U , ...tt-T \: LAKE 1 1'I..E: r DOUR!SE1'EN 5PRINCS {,_i r" x vP c } P� . \d ) i �y i hRA (j IPJ P :Yk r ( if L F TItACF SY k$ � SA IC ! 1 ..J"— Tit" o r t Y '1: 17YOA .: I "'�e4i + t t r {F;: � AHINF. :.. GULI?S1D1L( r s , '� kN[lAM U:%KS« e $ ND ,,,, , h 3 IInP,lt.ns wom. 111cusurJ�touoll axlNrY DISTRICT LJ CSA I CSA 5 Q CSA 9 =` ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS U OF l≤PASCO ASCU SCHOOL CU BOARD COUNTY CSA 2 CSA 6 CSA 10 '"# CONSERVATION AREA 1 CSA 3 E CSA 7 CSA 11CONCURRENCY I�T :AR SCHOOL LSJ SERVICE AREAS CSA 4 CSA 8 MAP 8. 5 q ,.ati�Ek+'Y' ;fig.,"pta s, a •xMi L LF . ,R„ ti sir; a2 �\ � ! 1 it ar 3f�k ^ ,.,}IEWiANDO COUNiY t. e�.Fi,.� :a-s3 sib',p1.yarrF"J a�a�h t - ' �r � a y ELF r Q'�3� z, �. �,�Vim'� .�. ,.: RI:•Iwnxlio eovxrr;',:. <, a. rr t aS t dart' 3iSt Yax\�t r,t I. }S₹'�?.„ ofrth ��.J' ni "c t'+s zv.`ii, rjl•. r .. ksf' aa� y54yr` ri. ✓ f I t1sy��sis'y+FlC"'ai1₹�'S S 'ij3�4" S /.� L� •.�Fr� I _ UUI 1 I r CS MO N r. /. .. � :. I � r �a J fn ('A22 i71\4 rF;Ffx�na i ttv Ufa —t-'t �.4. .. ;. -.� . �,i y t+ ,`f`z 'NAYO? i'OINT .:.� `�.�f flu al yb'F�j t'1),\r. :✓YhSf'i' ' r - , - ., rer Cr. •IFNNIA1 ' I- -i s f'aa,-����,�`.�:�,a\ J �- u � '. . } .'✓ ,y�3r"� � ,`,� j ._ ., �'"`�� .. W'� f Ca•1+.'"- '' :. ' ,: _ � lr fisgf5�w��F •' 1 r�� a�>a � �� � ;4w v�'Ir^,w— •.��k,r• I ,�r.,y� � o ROL tIUDGii A_,.. .'3�P;'�CJ•` ' ry . .ry',�.si ��.'t5?�r'C+r,,, �.r ;�. ., .:. .''� n F.IGI[TAlAA '� ��-., --�---.. . '' x F(��� I '�tf1�. tib + ��-�'TIIOTiAG�P'tV s ° + fisr ,;y CSA 1 .ati,kh+.t ''" "}4 a ", `�,`:?,�^ r �y,3I`45''+.''�✓.'�4u�y - r— - .". 00 �,y A.. / -� RAYFIDNDD Sl'EWART ;tx u•y, a,�,� I', r<;J ,parr 3 zgFf c a'taw₹x�f�� I ...:.Pt\611814::' t. - - ... k^ .. �g� z F V, �� .r?'•rchi. J l tyY�frC�k.,d I4 _ cnARc>A Rusns r: llfiwt" �" l nl ti f' tds SPR}NCS � . , SF1LrN ,�` e 2:--- "- .. Q 11ULR SAf1TH � �.' r .._ I ,. � [1 Dt JOI IN I ONG - .- iii 'COINTt c r''{" 777 CSA I A MIDDLE SCHOOLS DIS'©E PAS©HCO LN OARD CSA 2 r F-t CONSERVATION AREA MIDDLE SCHOOL CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS MAP 8.7 .rnt lW )0 AN( cowry:,:., . .-����eY .�`5^"` 7. { � J�"��r'1'Y4 4 i , ":f r •I' T •�+". �.n4'��r�•� +9� it1'��:.„yrk � � °w+'r,.' P'r-� '� \ � �� r� ' I \ r +i i• r _ pti r " hzs °3srt z} .. ''�S tC ry�4'i.{•v?,.{,� s Sa s",.t'`ai+fi r�,� ,'/ kr}+1•'� }� 1��x�x�':�3 �i ,��•* ,1[CNNANOO:.C(1UC77X. K"+t tf�1` l�S ')Rk !'fir•.uyyY4a ,Jk:3'I f A{I 3F a t A7#{F <�itrFr 5 .YY4 yye .i .0 l ,.' j 5 f (S452i : t.S42 � v t�, +� tr r c�1 TL ,, •�r`$.aSa +ci z t..�-�3 r. 3 i'• t::`SV2ta4�s4�r�VkA�µr }1 }�.i cu;\,` �•. ',■HUDSOY� r . / sr�y}�rdUYii�tf�\1!�S>;r'yas,ih in7t � I - �1 ��i 1 F,^iF\ �n�.I tF�v��t�'i��Y✓`��<CL I p $! a, .IASCO h � I . I,i `:. irwxcr �%nt • .:` �k�t, �-ati��•�' ���'i a � r I � I fl'S' • :� area t r�� -- � �s93113' &��""i oK�r�\r�.��a�'r�'�•a .:.! '..,d � 1 I �'!. l '5 •`� rrl € h+ f! 4 v Yn rESao l ■'' I ■ dJ firrF; C-S _L ROOD 1@C pn, Ar"�"•, 4.1NU O=LAKES -- ' Iu1 Y r lrFy,�a D"r3 f j. ■ WESLEI'CHAPEL ,�i � �'y1 ,+ E 7 ly r".6�v r✓rrN ? S itIIiVNIIII IS .,sIi _- - O roar - t t3�4J�;ts r .' r t ._ a I � S��l���ytn Y N eu+�i ' ; .£F�1S R.f"<.•�,' ],��;�{Y.G��+` it ''' � I "`.` � F'' � V VV •GULF !'r\✓9 t �ti1 v r,r rrorti`pt.. Y� , �� 4� � ��� �, i < ,, { Y"•�T �'�,v�f . r� -._.__.._ ',• ' ro-x�.�'t�Qa3:,. ;'. Lyi '�r�i{'f3j' J co /.Dt;tsr r^'* SUNLAKF. , ` ., 2.. JANP,S %NI1'(.'ilEL ■ y,qY {, H RtOttASS INCU F i ' / ai` 4r pt t ,MN[,LLS.COOtvIYr 4 F IiII Lgf 0Il0, COU)4T) CSA 1 ■ ]I]GH SCHOOLS DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF PASCO COUNTY CSA 2 E `"' CONSERVATION AREA HIGH SCHOOL CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS MAP 8.9