The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02-0882 BUILDING PERMIT~2 CITY OF ZEPHYRHILLS (813) 788-6611 1~ 3.5 D BUILDING 90-/ r ELECTRICAL 0882 Permit Date 1-3- t) ~ 70. p-V MECHANICAL Sewer Conn Permit Fee 75ignature Company Address YTelephone# €"/3- 7 f;;.. -O::J.7j- CEL.i- K'/3 713'-00028 Property Owner: Job Address: Parcel I. D. # Zoning: Energy Code: Radon Gas: 4/. it 0 Oeoe'i01m of Wo~ 1,dcl,;;, (:!f~wsA: ~ ~~,t :: T ~&::;= ....c::-0'_ r?p-,- p 1J~jg J ri:J. J. ~ /.'I/-/f;>' ~1; FINAL NO OCCUPANCY BEFORE C.O. Complete Plans. Specifications and Fee Must Accompany Application. All work shall be performed in accordance with City Codes and Ordinances. Valuation or ---.1 3 Contract Price I ~ , d 0 ~ e--o City License Registration # State Certified License# r29o! Water Conn: Water Meter: T.1. F .'s:''"q/ a5"% ~D") - "1/.;20 7~/t'Are..o 1lJ"...,-r ~YrJ"r-/-oh JR. F-ee Elt'c. c~ . eo,,-r.-' 2'10' --# I D to BUILDING ELECTRICAL Ftr.rf?'; 1~-4"O';- i~V Tp. Servo SLB Pre SLB 7; -'(-tJ) (ZL lj Rough In ,A --(.P-Oj, ,2t./(, hOTub Set Lintel V1-(,-c~ ilLY Meter Can Water FRM. /tL-/I'-O'2 Rt~/t7bconst. Pole Se Insul. CL:/ 11-/3 ,0" Rt.."f, ,q, Pool Final WL ./ II -J ~/O;:J.2t.r.t/1i1'f) Pre-Meler Finall/ 7.:; b' 0 2 R'-y Driveway 5c~~",~~4r- 3 -fd-6~ Iffc( l2.LY REINSPECTION FEES: When extra inspection trips are necessary due to anyone of the following reasons, a charge of Twenty Five and 00/100 Dollars ($25.00) shall be made for each trip for each trade: a. Wrong Address b. Condemned work resulting from faulty construction. c. Repairs or corrections not made when inspection called. d. Work not ready for inspection when called. e. Permit not posted on job site. f. Plans not at job site. g. Work not accessible. TlefrD /tt. (!....""/~1'/ II :J 11:;"'" MECHANICAL Breakers Ducts Insl&"'O~02 Rqj Iffo Compressor Final The payment of inspection fees shall be made before any further permits will be issued to the person owning same. ZEPHYRHILLS FIRE DEPARTMENT 38410 SIXTH AVE PH. 813-780-0035 ZEPHYRHILLS, FL. 33540 FAX 813-780-0036 ..- ':'",.,.- ~z ..!~, Business Name~< .-'? Owner/Mgr Address 1:"- ~ Occupancy Load ,) ~~._-- ',. - Bus. Phone Emergency Phone Date Pos~ \ '-- "" Contact Person Alarm Company Phone # Type of Inspection Conducted , Annual , ". Reinspect _ Quarterly _ Final-L' Commercial Check APPROVED ,.../ NOT APPROVED_ Other OK /NOT OK ,../ / Exit Signs --,-- 1- -..L _ Emergency Lights Heat Detectors -- _ L Sprinkler System f . ---L EXIts Window Size Control Valves _ Water Supply Duct Detectors _ Exposures OK NOT OK .....L .. _ Fire Extinguishers ---.L.../ Smoke Detectors _ _ Alarm Systems _ L- Hood System / -L' _ Storage Pressure Test Fire Dampers ..-,~ / Fire Walls ~. _ Address posted _,/ Hydrants -- OK NOT OK _ __ HV AC Shutdown _ __ Smoke Doors _ __ Elevators _L'<_ Electrical _ __ Tamper Switch _ __ Inspectors Test _ __ Smoke Separation Extension Cords --- _ __ Tenant Separation Smoke Evac. Code violations specified in this report, if not corrected could cause or contribute to the spread of fire, or prevent safe egress during a fire. Your immediate attention to the correction of these violations shall be required, failure to comply is a violation of the City of Zephyrhills Fire Prevention Code. - . Comments:] C ,- '- ,r /'j;' Inspection Datec:./<''':/~,~ . Time ofInspection ~~;? :;- Re-InspectlOn Date ,,,,,.--, ,""" .~~ ....l ~~ ---....., .'--',~ -~ /" ,." Inspectors Name ._~./ .r ~.,~ ,~ A':;" _--<'~- ..........'. . Fire Department I D # /' -('" "." / " :JI ' -,,' Owners / Mgr Name ./ ".J.-.-..... /r/ -"L, ,....~/ ~ . ~~ _ Title This building has been assessed by the z,Phyrhills Fire Department. Utilizing the Codes and Standards of, Standards, the State Fire Manhals Uniform Fire Safety Rules and other local fire safety codes. White Copy - File Yellow Copy - Business .-.,- ,'~' -- NFPA Minimum Revised 08-12-99 Robert Yarrington Jr. General Contraxctor First United Pentecostal Church 5840 - 18th St. SQ. FEET PRICE MAIN OR LIVING: 2,160 $ 52.00 OTHER AREA UNDER ROOF: $ 15.00 OTHER: $ - VALUATION $ 112,320.00 FEE SHEET $ 509,00 ADDRESS $ - DRIVEWAY $ - BUILDING: $ 763.50 CREDIT: $ - BUILDING LESS CREDIT: $ 763,50 ELECTRICAL: $ 90.18 PLUMBING: $ - MECHANICAL: $ 70.00 RADON: $ 21,60 TOTAL $ 945.28 SEWER: $ - WATER: $ - IRRIGATION: $ - TOTAL: $ - WATER METER:I $ IRRIGATION METER $ ~ I SUB-TOTAL $ 945.28 I SIPS:I $ 97.5% $ 2.5% $ - I NO v! J ~ z - "" 'II. ~j)&. ~ - '7 5":: -- ~, IT1 3. I) { (,Iff) tJ .... J-. tr t) r T IF'S: $ 2,764.80 [> 99% $ 2,737.15 1% $ 27.65 " TOTAL: $ 3,710.08 I FiLSI U,.u7"rfLJ PeuTEUA"SIJP-L eH0<<"C.H- OWNER'S NAME Cl f !k:. 'T S . . .r-o L/ I c--T'I" JOB SITE ADDRESS .;. ('J 0 L S II! eel CITY OF ZEPHYRHILLS PERMIT APPLICATIO~~J /2~(1,-]f U- BUILDING DEPARTMENT 5335 Sth STREET ZEPHYRHILLS, FL 33540 Phone:S13-7S0-0020 Fax:813-780-0021 DATB RECEIVED /2. - g5 - n I PLANS REVIEW FEE ' "7(5'.;1.- 0 ~ "'? S- PHONE CONTACT eel! 7/3 -Od;)..r- Z ep(1A.t,.i/1 S LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT(S) BLOCK SUBDIVISION ",P~"-"-'-'~-~~.".:~'~'.'-','.""',-', ., ~,'-""~ ~Il)"#~~ WORK PROPSED: DNEW CONSTRUCTION (OBTAIN FROM PROPERTY TAX NOTICE) ADDITION DALTERATIDN o REPAIR o INSTALL DSIGN o MOVE o DEMOLISH ~UILDING PROPOSED USE: DSGL FAMILY DWELLING DMULTI-FAMILY 0# OF UNITS 0 MOBILE HOME o COMMERCIAL 0 INDUSTRIAL 0 SWIMMING POOL II ~THER CJ RESTAURANT . HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPRDVAL ~~ A DESCRIPTION DF NDRK cd4;. j Ff II""" 5 " ~ '" /I L II 9- S To" ,II? c VV ,- C";or I ~ 1-1 BUILDING SIZE )"7, '-/ X s&, SQUARE FOOTAGE~rJV :2/60 ~.- HEIGHT ilf 57:;;vcl.uj RESIDENTIAL: ATTACH (2) PLOT PLANS & (2) SETS OF BUILDING PLANS & (1) SET ENERGY FORMS. COMMERCIAL: ATTACH (3) SETS OF BUILDING PLANS & (1) SET ENERGY FORMS. PROPERTY SURVEY REQUIRED FOR ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION. ~ t; r< PERMITS REQUESTE0:::-0 ~~3-:----- VALUATION OF TOTAL CONSTRUCTION. . .,?__-. ! AMP SERVICE rII FLORIDA PDWER / [;] .:,r.It.~ ~ VALDATION DF MECHANCI I~~!:r!4~ t:/t o OTHER \~3----'# $ <)0000 2.80 o GAS o ROOFING $ 1j OC)O o SPECIALTY ~ELECTRICAL o PLUMBING ~ECHANICAL TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: J BLOCK o FRAME o STEEL o OTHER IS PROJECT IN FLOOD ZONE AREAD YES r6 NO FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS BUILDER SIGNATURE BLBCTRICIAN SIGNATDREV'~ Y R-- COMPANY r/Et:: c/ecI STATE CERT OR REGIST # CITY PROCESSING # \~l, ****************************************************************** PLUMBER COMPANY STATE CERT OR REGIST #. CITY PROCESSING # * ** **** ** *** *** **** *** *** *** * *************~~::***** *** * "T'7. K - ~~ 9- fill( COMPANY r / R C) ~-'1 , '_ A f2. 'fL/ E~ I ... STATE CERT OR REGIST # c..4CO 'I '3 Of g.s CITY PROCESSING # .J.. 9/.1 >>r;, ~-, ~ ******************* SIGNATURE COMPANY STATE CERT OR REGIST # CITY PROCESSING # AJ~ ***************************************************************** '" ..'....JJ A-... (lC...A-L- 1VIlll"'~~ Ll.llrH ~~) CONDITIONS OF PERMIT AFFIDAVIT A. NOTICE OF DEED RESTRICTIONS The undersigned understands that this permit may be may be more restrictive than City regulations. The co~pliance with any applicable deed restrictions. B;' , UNLICENSED CONTRACTORS AND CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITIES If the owner has hired a contractor or contractors to undertake work, they may be required to be licensed in accordance with state and local regulations. If the contractor is not licensed as required by law, both the owner and contractor may be cited for a misdemeanor violation under state law. If the owner or intended contractor are uncertain as to what licensing requirements may apply for the intended work, they are advised to contact the City of Zephyrhills Building Department, 813-788-6611. Furthermore, if the owner has hired a contractor or contractors, he is advised to have the contractor(s) sign portions of the "Contractor Sections" of this application for which they will be responsible. If you, as the owner signs as the contractor, you are indicating that you, rather than the contractor, are responsible for the work. If the contractor wishes you to sign as contractor that may be an indication that he is not properly licensed and is not entitled to permitting privileges in the City of Zephyrhills. C. TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES AND UTILITY CONNECTION FEES D. CONSTRUCTUION LIEN LAW (CHAPTER 713, FLORIDA STATUTES, AS AMENDED) I certify that I, the applicant, have been provided with a copy of "Florida's Construction lien Law - Homeowner's Protection Guide" prepared by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs. If the applicant is someone other that the "owner", I cerify that I have obtained a copy of the above described document and promise in good faith to deliver it to the "owner" prior to commencement. E. CONTRACTOR'S/OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT I certify that all the information in this application is accurate and that all work will be done in compliance with all applicable laws regulating construction, zoning, and land development. Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do work and installation as indicated. I certify that no work or installation has commenced prior to issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet standards of all laws regulating construction, City codes, zoning regulations, and land development regulations in the jurisdiction. I also certify that I understand that the regulations of other governmental agencies may apply to the intended work, and that it is my responsibility to identify what actions I must take to be in compliance. Such agencies include but are not limited to: *Department of Environmental Regulation-Cypress Bayheads, Wetland Areas and Environmentally Sensitive Lands, Water/Wastewater Treatment *Southwest Florida Water Management District-Wells, Cypress Bayheads, Wetland Areas, Altering Watercourses *Army Corps of Engineers-Seawalls, Docks, Navigable Waterways *Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, Environmental Health Unit-Wells, Wastewater Treatment, Septic Tanks *U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Asbestos abatement I also certify that, if fill material is to be used in Flood Zone "A" or "A, etc.", it is understood that a drainage plan addressing a "compensating volume" will be submitted which is prepared by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida prior to permit issuance. A permit issued shall be construed to be a license to proceed with the work and not as authority to violate, cancel, alter, or set aside any provisions of the technical codes, nor shall issuance of a permit prevent the Building Official from thereafter requiring a correction of errors in plans, construction, or violations of any code. Every permit issued shall become invalid unless the work authorized by such permit is commenced within six months of issuance, or if work authorized by the permit is suspended or abandoned for a period of six months after the time the work is commenced. One 90 day extension of time may be allowed for the permit with fee charge of $15.00. The extension shall be requested in writing to the Building Official. An approved inspection must be logged during each six month period, or the project will be considered abandoned. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMEN $2,500 IN VALUE DO NOT NEED TO RECORD AND POST A "NOT F COMMENC subject to "deed restrictions" whi~h undersigned assumes responsibility for TQR COUNTY OF """~ t2c-15r-t fl The foregoing instrument was acknowledged Before,~ this ~day OfY~, -,dCXJI by . 'MERT . V/J'RPI 70 (name of person acknowledged) o who is personally knoWIl to me, or . Diho is personally known to me, or1Jt2 I . d5cP-170--'7rIJO ~hO has produced FJ. :7JRltJ,J.../t' .1.:/S;J.-//lu~Jlj/lrO ~ho has produced, 7JPIJ, .. . (type Of. identification) . ~.tYPe O...f.. identlflcatlon) and who .i,d no t ke an oa . and~..Jtd _ ..d ot take an ,:"th ( ~/ &~A/j Signature of person taking acknowl~gment IN YOUR G, CONSULT BS UNDER I/~ (l~ ~ ~b~ SI ATutiEi- OR AGENT STATE OF FLORID~ COUNTY OF ~LJ The foregoing instr ent was Before me this by \ Name Bobbie Swetland .ki>rint.~r6blV 12.t.aA>ed -;.~., BONDED THRU TROY FAIN INSURANCE. INC. If'" ...~~ Rnhh~ ~"'IilIIeReI Name ~~ i Mt>~~N.CC8~~ ~~.......,~", February 22, 2004 .....'If..r.:'1< BONDED THRU TROY FAIN INSURANCE, INe An Equal Opportunity Employer Ronnie E. Duncan Chair, Pine lias 1bomas G. Dabney, II Vice Chair, Sarasota J.net D. KOYIICh Secretary, Hillsborough WlItson L ...,...... II Treasurer, Pinellas Edw.... W. Chance Manatee Monroe MAlw CoogI.r Citrus MBggI. N. Dominguez Hillsborough P..... L Fwrtreu Highlands ROIIIIIG C. Johnson Polk Heidi B. McCree Hillsborough John K. Renk., III Pasco E. D. MSonnyW V........ Executive Director Gen. A. He8th Assistant Executive Director WIIII_ S. Bllenky General Counsel Protecting Your Water Resources Southwest Florida Water Management District --- -. 2379 Broad Street, Brooksville, Rorida 34604.6899 (352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (Fl only) SUNCOM 628-4150 TDD only 1-800-231-6103 (FL onty) On the Internet at: WaterMatters.org "~'~""il ~-c_ - _ iii' Tampa Service Office 7601 Highway 301 North. Tampa. Rorida 33637-6759 (813) 985-7481 or 1-800-836-0797 (FL only) SUNCOM 578-2070 Bartow Service OffIce 170 Century Boulevard Bartow, Rorida 33830-7700 (863) 534-1448 or 1-800-492-7862 (FL only) SUNCOM 572-6200 Sarasota Service OffIce 6750 Fruitville Road Sarasota, Florida 34240-9711 (941) 377-3722 or 1-800-320-3503 (FL only) SUNCOM 531-6900 Lecanto Service OffIce 3600 West Sovereign Path Suite 226 Lecanto, Rorida 34461-8070 (:352) 527-8131 SUNCOM 667,3271 November 26, 2001 Clifford R. Lukens First United Pentecostal Church of Acts, E & C.R. Lukens, Trustees 5409 Ninth Street Zephyrhills, FL 33540 Subject: Notice of Final Agency Action - Approval Environmental Resource Noticed General Construction Project Name: First United Pentecostal Church of Acts _ Zephyrhills 47022938.000 Pasco 11/26S/21E November 14, 2006 Permit No: County: SecITwp/Rge: Expiration Date: Dear Mr. Lukens: The District acknowledges your intent to use a Noticed General Construction Permit for the project referenced above. Plans and information received will be kept on file in the Brooksville Service Office in support ofthis determination. The proposed construction must be completed before the expiration date indicated above. The proposed construction is subject to general conditions of Rule 400-400.215, Florida Administrative Code (F AC.), (Exhibit A, copy enclosed) and the specific conditions of Rule 40D-400.475(1)(d), FAC. Deviations from these conditions may subject you to enforcement action and possible penalties. You are responsible for conducting construction in a manner which satisfies all criteria, Final approval is contingent upon no objection to the District's action being received by the District within the time frames described below. You or any person whose substantial interests are affected by the District's action regarding a permit may request an administrative hearing in accc;>rdance with Sections 120,569 and 120,57, F.S., and Chapter 28-106, FAC., of the Uniform Rules of Procedure. A request for hearing must: (1) explain how the substantial interests of each person requesting the hearing will be affected by the District's action, or proposed action, (2) state all material facts disputed by the person requesting the hearing or state that there are no disputed facts, and (3) otherwise comply with Chapter 28-106, FAC. Copies of Sections 28-106.201 and 28-106,301, F.A.C. are enclosed for your reference. A request for hearing must be filed with (received by) the Agency Clerk of the District at the District's Brooksville address within 21 days of receipt of this notice. Receipt is deemed to be the fifth day after the date on which this notice is deposited in the United States mail. Failure to file a request for hearing within this time period shall constitute a waiver of any right you or such person may have to request a hearing under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, F.S. Mediation pursuant to Section 120.573, F.S., to settle an administrative dispute regarding the District's action in this matter is not available prior to the filing of a request for hearing. . ~rATE OF flORIOA DEPARTI\1ENT OF COMMU"'JITY AFFAIRS , H e i pin g F! 0 rt d i a. n s cr e.a t e sa f e: V i bra r. t. $ U st (; In a b lee 0 m m lJ n i ti e s · JEB eliS'i CO....fw:..)r STiY[', M. SEIBERT SKrtUr;' JUJie i 7, 1999 Nassau Nazarene Church Pest Office Box 1750 YuJee, Fq 32041 ATTN.: Pastor R.E: Chu.rch Accessibility Requirements Dear Pastor: Per your req\,;est, please find enclosed some information regarding the Florida Accessibility C~dc as applied to churches and church facilities, I am sending a copy of a memo written by one of the Department's attorneys, Alfred O. B:-agg, on the issue of accessibility requirements for church facilities nnd ll.n excerpt from :he minLltes of the December 1998 Florida Building Commission meeting. This excerp: contains the opinions of the commission Chairman, Steve Pfeiffer, and some commission members expressed during the accessibility waiver voting process, /t As you can see, there are conflicting interpretations of church accessibility requirements in Florida. The determjnation of whether federal law governs Qr state lay' applies requires a legislative resolution, \vnich unfortunatelY has not yet occurred. Until the Legislature addresses this matter, most building departments in Florida are foilowina Mr. Bragg's interpretation and cor.sider the Florida accessibility :-equirements waived only with regard to the church sanctuary. ?iease call me if you have any qL:esrions. , . encJosures ~ Katherir:e R. B ~r ' Assistant General Counsel 2SSS SHUMA~D OAK eOULEVARD . TAlI.AHASSfE, FLOItIDA 32399.1100 Pho/l.., leso) 411l\.E.lb6/SI,,//lcom 27t\.8466 FAX, IIlSOi ~!'21.C78:1SI,,/IHcm 291.0781 Interr1et .ddrus: httl):llww.....stace il.....a/com.ill tlOIl'O", II;(YS ~ft'. 01 '::fi<.iul St.at. ,cOl'\(.,n '_Id Otr.~. J1'6 o.e"..1. "'i'~""h. SI.II'" ~ \ l ~\at..~oo. ~I~.'d, l}~So.llH G~UN sw"'^\~ Aru Of CdhC'a1 JUt. Cor..-;,m (II~ld O,ll:" lO, IHI "I,oi^ ~I.wt. ~vjl. 10. '.I'tOW, FlOf.d& .H41o...!" t ._~O !\,ll:'{uTES FLORIDA BCILDING COMMISSION PLEN~illY SESSION December 8l 1998 y. P..l..'.g;.; 5 ': 1 6, :.. :3.s e r< E !L-O_..B A N ~ U H TO: G. Ste~en Pfeiffer Chairman, Flcricc. Builcli;"'J.\.;' Conunis::; Alfred C. Bragg, II! A~ 'AA~( Assistant General CounselV~ IV Accessibi:ity Requiremen~s fo Faci ties Churche5 and Other Religious Ent~ties FROM: RE: '1:'he i.';:s..:.e is whe~her under the Floridi:l American.s With D15- abilit~es .F.ccessibility !r.lplement.ation J...ct, as amended (the "Ac- cessibili ty Act")) buil dings ~ owned by leU,g ious en ti ties which woul~ otherwise be sUbJect to the requirement~ of the Accee~ibi:ity. Act are now exe~pt fro~ those requiremen~s cecause of the deletion' from the Act of language subjecting "churchEHi" to its requirernen-.:s. ~ ~ 553.505, Fla. Stat. (1995). One instance of such a building woul~ be a hospital owned by a religious organization. The issue takes on added complexity not only because of the differences in wording between the "religious oiganizationsU exemption in Title II: of the A:nericans ~.;it:. Cisabilit1'es Act ot 1990 and the one sub- jecting "c~urchesN to the AccesSibility Act, but also due to dif-. ferences in purpose between Title IIr and the Acc~ssibi1ity Act.' As first approved by the Legi~:ature, the Accessibility Act overrode the Title III exemption ~n the tollowing lanQ~aqe: "Not- withstandlng any provisio~ of the America.ns With .cisacilities h-:t .. of :990, churches and private clubs shall be governed by the re- quiremen:s of" the Accessibility Act. ~ 1, Ch. 93-183, Fla. Laws; ~ 553.505, Fla. Stat. (1995). The issue ari.ses because t;'le Legis- lature later amende-:l the Act by deleting "churches" from this sen- tence. S 4, Ch. 96-76, Fla. Laws. This reinstates the exemption for "churchesu under Title III, or ~o~e portion of it. The pivotal issue is ~hether the orloina1 reference to "churchesH was intended to denote the bUllding i~tself or ...as intend(~d tc have the broader meaning of a rei~qiou5 institution as a whole. The former inter- pretatio~ wc~ld c~e!te 2n exemp:io~ only fer :he b~ilding ~here the 1 An iss\Je related to this one, but not ~!;ddressed here, is the see p e 0 f the e :< e:n p ::: ion in T i tl e I! I 0 f the- A.m €~ r i can 5 ~H t h D i s a b i 1 i _ ties Act of 1990 for: \\.teligiot.:s organizations or entities controll- ed -by religious crganizati':ms, inclucing placl;s of 'r;orship." See 42 U.S.c. 5 122B7 (199~): 28 c.r.R. g 36.102(e) (1998). Hemo r a.ndUJT~ August: 16, :998 Page 2 actt.:.al relioious ObSel"Var:ce takes p':'ace, ~,; <,:hat it would cover SUCh bU':'ldi~gs as :ncsques, ter..ples, synaq09ues and :he like, but ~ot ot~er buildings owned cr controlled by the religious organiza- tior;s slJch as schoclhous es ar.d hosp:.. tal~;. Un::.er the latter read.ing, "cnurc;hes" as used ~tl the Acces,:ibility Act would be construed to have the same meanin; as "religious orqanizationsU as the latter phrase is used in 7itle III. ,Although it is a close question, in my opinion the be:ter interpretation of the Accessi- bility Ac~ ~s the former o~e: that ~churchesH was intended to de- note the type:>! building used for a religiCll.lS observance, so that the deletion of churches from the scope of ~he Act did not relieve ~eligious orga~lzations of acce5sibil1ty requirements as applied to other jn~ild:..ngs owned or controlled by .such. organizations. My conclusion is based cn several considerations, not all of which may be rel~tec.. The first co~sidera~ion is the difference in nomenclature be- tween the reference to "religious organizationsN in Title III of the k",~ricar.s iJith Disab,;,:ities Act of 1990 and the L;se of the ex- pression "churches" in the Accesaibility Act. Here a his~orical perspec:ti ve is needed. 8efore th.e Access ibi 1 i ty Act. went into! effec-:, ttle buildinq accessitility' requirerc\ents in the State of Florid,;:. had covered. religious en:it:.es and t:l1e faciliti.es owned by them for many years. for inst~nce, some nineteen years earlier the Legislature had approved accessibil~ty requirements inter alia for "monas:eries.u 5 J, Ch. 74-292/ Fla. Laws. ~hen it first approved the .;,c::es sibili t y Act, the Leg;,s 1 a lu=e ...:as follmoling a nu.'!\ber of requirements in Tltle III and expanding on others. It knew the no- rnen;latureused in Title rII, so its use of "churches" rather than the Titl~ III phrase "religious organizationsH may be deemed to be intentional.2 ~hat is more, thi5 is consistent with the interpre- ta~ion of the Act by the Board itself in lts actions on waivers. rro~ the time the Act ~ent int:> effect ~ntil the deletion of the \\chl.:.rch~s" ~eference nc.:-e tha" three years later the Act was construed to cover facilities owned by churches. The deletion of "churchesN from the Act merely gave ris~ to the logical converse of the sit~atio~ that existed before: that although churches are no ... ; The cifference ln wording may give rise to the inference :hat the Legislatu=e did not override all of the ~reliqio~s organ- izations" exem?tion in Title III, but on':'y S~ rr...;ch 0: it as en- compassed ~churches.~ There ~s no text~al ev~dence i~ the Act of such an intent. 7ne "chur:ches" reference ITIl.iSt also be construed in the cc~tsxt o~ the a~tecedent accessibili:y requireme~ts, ~hich had applied to buildlngs o~ned cr ccntr~lled by r(ligious i~stitutions. ~e!:"~o't"'a :1-::.~~ Aug'.;.st 16, 1.990 Page 3 longer subject to ~~e =~quiremen~5, other facilities owned or con- trolled by churches continue to be governed by those requirements. Thi.s "logical converse" r-aticnale is net a conclusive consider- at:c~, b~t it i~ persuasive. Another consideration s;,,],pporting ny CC)::J.c,;,usion lies in t!1e diffErences ~n theme and purpose between th~ knericans With D1s- ab~lities Act of 1990 and the Access~bility Act. While it is true tha~ these laws have many averlapping requirements, the reality i~ that the Americans With Disab~lities Act is a much broader piece of legislaticn than.the Accessibility Act. The tormer is a clas~ical ci vi 1 1 iberties measure bear i rIg an urunista I(able functional and struct\l,ral resel'nblance to the. Civil F..i,g'hts Act: of 1964. The latter codifi!!5 a .set of b'lilding rei:IulreIt'.e;)ts,~ and operates as authoricy fer the Accessi~ility Code ~or Building Construction. Because the Acce5s~bility Act only regulates buildings and building constru~- tion, it is replete with references t::> thE!! uses, purposes ana functions of buildings a~d components of buildings. Its descrip- t.ions of buildings center on the functiCJn ot: the buildir.q or bui ldi ng component and their e f teet upon accessibili ty. Nowhere does the Act differentia~e between Buildings or building components based on the identity of the owner.~ The consistent referen~es in ~he AcceSSibility Act to build- ings by reference to use, purpose and function is further evidence ~nat the former reference to "churches" in ~he Accessibility Act was intended to denote the build~ng or edifice ~n which the actual rel1gious observance takes place rat~er than the organization WhlCh is its owner. 7his lS an application of the rule of int~rpretation ncs::itJ~r a sociis: that the meaning of the "ch:.1rches" reflirence may be determi.ned fr'om the pa.~'al1el :.:efi:rences in the Act to other kinds of buildings. Given the aIT~igui~y of the "churches" refer- ence, t..":is is a legitimate rule of ir.terprer.,~tion. If the refer- ence tears ~he same func~icnal rel~tion5hip to the section of the ~ ) For instance, the Acces5ibl~i:y Act refers more than once to the "bu:ldings, structures, and ~acilit~es" by reference to func- tion rather thar! the identity of :.he owner. ~ tl~ 553.504 (9), 553.507(1), 553.507(2), Fla. Ste.t. (1!?97j. Specific classes of "buildings, stn.:ctures, and fa,:11i'.:ies" zre further identified by func:'icr., not by t:-:e identit/ of rr:i.:! owrier. ~:~ ~ 553.504 (2) I Fla. S::at. (1997) :"houses, duple}\es, triplexes"); s; 553.504(7), Fla. S':a~. (l997) ("public food se.t:v;.c"" est;,a.bL,5~l;T.ents")j ~ 553.504(6). n. a . S tat. ( 1997) ( "mo t ~ 1,<; c r. d ho tel s "): f; :.i 5:3 . 507 (2) (a), Fl a . S':a:. D997) ("residential" ane \';.onr~sidential/ uses). " Memorandum August 16, 1996 Page 4 Ac: where it appears as the "motels and ~otals" .::eference in its subsection, the reference is to the tu~lding based on its use, not on t~e t~~e of inst~tution owning it. Last, the overall purpose ot the Acc~$s~bility Act as first passed was to previde at least as =uch protection to ~he disabled population of the State as had been afforded earlier. The overrid- ing theme of the Act is to =reate a general regime of accessibil- i ty, 5ubj ect to those exceptions specified ;',,11 the Act itself. Ap- plying this rule militates as well to the conclusion that the re- ference to ~churchesH was intended to cover o~:y the buildings, not the institutions owning then-., because theamendmen t deleting it from the Act carved out an exception to tte oY~rall requirements of the Act callinq for accessl::Ji':ity. G..:.nm the overall theme ar.d purpose of the Act, the eKceptions Clre i:O be given a narrcw interpretation. Samara Developmer.t Core. ..y.. Marlow, 556 So.2d 1097, 1100-01 (Fla. 1990); Farrev v, Betten::b,r!, 96 So.2d BSS, 893 (Fla. 1~57); ?-PI. Inc. v. Deoartrne~,t of B1Jsj,ness and Professio:,al, Reculaticn, 698 So.2d 306, 308 (Fla.. 3d DCA 1997); C:>e v. Bro,({Atd <;guntv, 327 So.2d 69, 71 (Fla. 4th ;:)CA), U,:irt'l}=.Q, 341 So.2d 762 (:!:la. 1976) ; .s.~e City at: i)une~lon:'v. A=ar" 662 So.2d 1026, 1027 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). :f that rule of interpretation ~s applied here, the narrower readinQ of the \\c~>'JUrGhes!J exce~tior-: to ac:.::essi- bility ceteris ~aribus supersedes the troader ene. Based on this consideration and the others discussed earlier, it is my opinion tha t the dele tion 0 f the rE: ference :0 "churches" from ~ 553.505, Fla. Stat. (1995) by Ch. 97-7cr Fla. ~aws, relieved bUildings used for communal religious observilrJ~es from the accessi- bili. ty requi rerr,ents of -:.he Act. T~ese ....ould include cl",urches, synagoques, temples, mosques and other bUildings intended for con- gregations to gather for the performance of religious ceremonies. The exception did not relieve institutio~s SUCh as ~ospitals owned by religious orga~izat1ons from compliance with the accessibil~ty requirements in the Act. .. cc: S~zanne H, Schmith Richard N. Dixon BrUce R. Ketcham Mf;.MO, Ie F I l I /i 3. Educat~(}nal Building For Colonial !hptist Church: Mi. Pfeiffer asked that !\1r. Murdock take the floor as Chw. He state,i that he ha.d some comments with regard to this application that he would prefer to make ss a member of the CommiBsion rather than as Chair. Ms. Bernhart advised the Commission that the Council reconunender:1 denying the applicant's request for a waiver from providing vertical ..cc~ssibility to t.b: second floor of a two~story church educational building with respect to the toilet rooms. The Council relcoOllnends granting the request for installation of an. elevator und! the second iloor is complf.lted mth the provisions that the elevator shaft be CO:.1structed at the time the fi:-st floor is bebg built. Mr. Gat), McDonald and Pastor Les Warren were present to repre!ent the applicant who Wi$ requesting a waiver from providing vertical accessibility for a proposed 10.000 square feot, twe-story church educational building which will be adjacent (connected) to the existing worship/educational building. This facility. 'with an estimated p~ojec1 b'Jdget ofS400,OOO will be utilized for church Sunday schooi and office in conjunction with worship services. The applicant is alae! requesting an exemption from the installation ofan enlarged water closet on the second floor of the proposed facility. Mr. McDonald stated the hardship was created because the building Wa.!1 dedgned with the understanding that churches were exempt. After the design and during the process, they were made aware. of Mr. Brasg's memo stating that some build~s owned by churches are not exempt. Mi'. McDonald felt that because tbe building is used as a chure!"... it '"iould b~ deserving of an exemption. For financial reaSO:1S, addi."lg the c~gense of w elevator l!iJld other items is a major challenge. M..r. Warren stated that the building was designed to be 8::cessibIe to everyone; there is notJ'lJng on the second floor that is not duplicated on the first floor. :Mr. Pfeiffer stated that he believed that the apptica.'1t and this facility are ex.empt from the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities A~ (.~A) and the Iijorida Disability Act (FDA). He said he would like to make a. statement and adviseoihe Com..nission ti.at he was making the statement V'vith much reluctance because it is contrary to the opinion Md the counsel of his colleague, A1 Bragg. Mr. Pfeiffer commented that Mr. Bragg understands because in their profession. disagreement is part of what they anticipate. In fact, without di$3,grecment. attorneys wouldn't ever make any money. He said he has a great dea.!. of confidence in 'Mr. Bragg and regards him as a trusted advisor and goed fric.nd'l~ever, he disagrees with Mr. Braggls interpretation ofthe Statute. Mr. Pfeiffer said it was :5 opbion that the Legislative intent was to make churches exempt to the wne extent that they are in the provislons of ADA. The exemption for churches exist in Florida law. The forme:- exemption exist because the Legislature had inserted the word "churches" into the act and specifically made churches by that ll=tion subject to requirements of the Florida Speciiic Accessibility Requirements. In 1997 the Legislature removed that word. Mr. Pfeiffer said he thought the Legislature believed it w.u making churches exempt from the Florida Specific Requirements and making accessibili.ty re~~irement& applicable to churches only to the extent that they are applicable under the ADA.Fhat being the case, Mr. Pfeiffer believes the CO.m.mission is without authority to issue an exelnption for trus church facility, and should instead issue a final order. This order would state tha! the church is exempt, no exemption is required and the Comm.ission doesn't have the authmity to gra.,.-lt an exemption because none is needc,U ;;t~ ~ ...b lvfr. Lipka ql.1estioned the t4SC of the propeny. :.\ls. Berrlllart said it w'ill be utilized for f\ churd~ Sunday school and office in conjunction with worship servicc~:l. .'vft. Murdock asked Ms. .' ; , / r . 'f' hi " A 1"\' . Jd .. h h' T"'ver wa::. "CS .:.~ ..,ern,lart 1.: swas sttiC::JY an :-UJ.'-\ ISSU{:, WOu tillS r.. ure ;:,e cxerrut. "C: a.l1S,. J. There was disr.:ussion iCf,arding access :0 t~:e second fJoo~' and equal participation. Mr. Shaw said he ~r.ought equal \"'f.S aniy equal if you could get there. He alf,O asked to here \1.". Bragg's interpretation. Ivir. Bragg said he only has th:ee trungs to say; (J) He does no: recede from the opinions express()ci in his Augl.l&t 16, 1998 i.1ernorandum, (with no disrespect tc the Chair:nar" he and I hS'/c disagreed cn issues before anc ~nti1 one or both 0[1,;5 is brair. dead, I expect we wit; contin:.Je to disagree on is;;ul:s as long as we know each other); (2) I cJncede in the August 16, opinion and I concede today that the issue is en eX1remel~' close one. J believe the Chairmlll1 and I can agree 0:'1 that. I therefDre would also state tha: the Pastor Uld Mt. McDcnald were quite reasonable in their assumption that the church, liS an Lnstituticn, carm: within the exemption of October 1 1997; (3) lA.s I recall, the questions propounc\ed to me whic.h led to the preparatiun of '1: the AUg'Js: 16 mer:1~dum ciea.:t v...ith outside facilities owned by religious organizations (such as elementary a.1d ~econdary scheels, and hospitals that were not really l::1tegra1 to religious devotions). This is a $lJnday Schooi and therefore, presents yet a clos~r q\Jestion that was not sqiJarely disposed of by the August 16 memorandum. Dr. Richardsml asked Mr. Bragg to clarify his position. M(. Bragg said the rule of interpretation that he relied 011 in the August 16 memorandull1 was that exemptions or excepti.:Hl3 from the general ruh~ i:1 a stat'Jte are to be narroloNly construed. A rule of interpretation the Supreme Court has a;pplied time after time. If I had to take a chan~e on anyone interpretatiol"" I WQuld say t4at the S':mday Sfhool is also subje~t to the accessibility requirements because I cor.stiUed churches as mea::t1ng the 'literal house of worship, but' not the buildings which pro....ide st:condary functions. ~er discussion regarding -K-" church ov.ned buildi."lgs and outside buiJdi:lgs en the church propertj', Mr. Pfeiffer said it was his ~ view that churChes are exempt from Florida S pecific !'~quirements to the same extent that they ~. e exempt from Federal ADA requirements.~.lt. Wiggins f~lt the Legislature intended the same )'f" purpose as the FederaJ Congress by enacting exemptio~'f.)r churches ~U1d similarly, that churches have.tax exempt status. 11r. Wiggins s.a.id he thought Legisla~ion have left it up to the instir..xtions ofworshjp \l,:hether t~.e}' want to provide f~l1y for accessibility in their 0....'l1 free conscious or whether they wa.nt to be n;a..'1dated by Government. He L~ought L1e Florida Statute had been clear in that regard. 1v1'.r. Wiggings asked Mr. Warren if their Sunday School was pa..rt of the worship for the chl:fch. Mr. Wa.rren said they considered the worship a.'1d the trai.r.i..-:.g equally valuable nnd imponant and therefore is part of the church. There needs to be trab.i.ag in order to be i..ltelligent worship l'vir. Walthour as!ced ifit was an occupancy cl~.ssification. Mr. Kopczynski asked~. Bragg if it mattered whether or not there was fi.!lanci.d gain. Mr. Bragg s.aid only if you first determine that this building does n.ct come 'Mthin any exemption. Mr, Bragg said he wanted to make a couple more comments; (1) In iesponse to Mr. Wiggins, if the Legislature had used the same I angl..\ age Congress used, it would have beer. dear. We would;'l't be holding this conversation at all and these two gentlemen wouldn't be here; (2) In response to t\.~L'. Walthcur, I did view it as an occupancy classification rather that an Institution; (3) To Mr. Kopczynski, I wou~d say that the presence or absence offinancia1 gain ',1,'culd be material to the presen(;e or absence' ofhe.rdsrup, but hardship is not an issue if the Commission determines that Ihty come within the exemption in the Erst place. lfthey come within the ex.cm~ticn, the piesence o. absence of hardship is immaterial. ~fr. Bragg said the Ol'jy other CO;t'.me~'. he wanted to make was. whe~her the Sl.!nda.y School is integral to the process of worship; (1) It's ar. iss'-le of fact fox the Commission t:) determine; it is r~c.t 2.r. issue of law fer me to :tdvise Or!; (2) r believe the Pastor and the church he represents are uniquely qualified to r.1a.i.;e that det;:rmination. ! do not beli.eve any of us can second ." J t.. J' ;: / guess it. J),-. Richardson made <i motion to g'a.:lt tr:e :equest for a ';~l;J.'/er from venical acces!>ibilit)' On the bases that they a,;-e pan of the church. A se~ond was received from 1vfr, Shaw ~lvir, Murdock said ifth3.~ was tt:e CO:-:liensus ('1fthe Commission rne:-nber5, the ch:Jrch doesn't need /\ Eo waiver. The Commission caIl't grar:! !he:n a waIver, but we can $,'lY that We fee! t~1ey sho~ldn't be here in :he first place, and be finLi order will .say that they are exempt 3..'1 a church. Ms. Murdock asked if that ,.vas the m:Hicr: a.rld Ms. Richardson said yes. 'r:"le seoond to the motior. also agreed. Mr. Kopczynski ashd Dr, Richardson to ~luifY her motion statL.1.g that the applicam should be eKemp1: as a church, Ms. Ric~ardson said that in liStCnLT1i ':0 the P:utor it see::ns as though what's going the Sunday School fu:1cticn is part of the church, The question was called and the vote of the Corrunis~ion: "YEA" 9 "NAY" 4 I. hYLs I UNl TfiJ) jE/I.fc6- V-.}/iCL C' (-.Jufc~CH R~\)tiI2.r 'Yp,VlfurJmtJ 6-F-N ,C.OA!TItt4<:...r.-:..f\.. . C-t1uvLc- H- " .~. .... . . sa. P=E!T ~ .. .. ....CIIUw.; --- '2 lloo t 5L, i;:;,0 ',- S O"IH!!R.AIII!A V-BL._ .. ,. . YAUlAna. s . J -- s s fJl fr - s - Os N/fr s' '7u, CD 2 (c.c,C) s 2-/. (00 IJ ',2-10 fWL lift, ';)~ P-. I /.l.... i I( 2J be. TlJ'~~~ Z i 710 'I gt:> r , Whole Building Performance Method for Commercial Buildings Form 400A-97 ENERGY EFFICIENCY CODE FOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION Florida Department of Community Affairs FLA/COM-97 Version 2.2 BUILDING TYPE: _Assembly CONSTRUCTION CONDITION: Existing Building DESIGN COMPLETION: _Addition CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA; _2124 MAX. TONNAGE OF EQUIPMENT PER SYSTEM; ____ COMPLIANCE CALCULATION: PROJECT NAME 1ST UNITED PENTECOSTAL CHUR ADDRESS; _ZEPHYRHILLS, FLORIDA c:;- ~ "/0 - / q cr..JI ,;iT. OWNER: _TBD AGENT; PERMITTING OFFICE: _Zephyrhills CLIMATE ZONE: _4 PERMIT NO: TBD JURISDICTION NO:_611600 NUMBER OF ZONES: 2 METHOD A ----------------- A. WHOLE BUILDING PRESCRIPTIVE REQUIREMENTS: LIGHTING EXTERIOR LIGHTING LIGHTING CONTROL REQUIREMENTS HVAC EQUIPMENT COOLING EQUIPMENT 1. SEER 2. SEER HEATING EQUIPMENT 1. Et 2. Et AIR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM INSULATION 1. Without Insulated R 2. Without Insulated R REHEAT SYSTEM TYPES USED NO REHEAT SYSTEM is USED WATER HEATING EQUIPMENT PIPING INSULATION REQUIREMENTS 5 DESIGN CRITERIA RESULT 64.53 100.00 PASSES 140.00 150.00 PASSES PASSES 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 PASSES PASSES 1.00 1.00 REQUIREMENTS 6.00 6.00 N/A N/A 0.00 0.00 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I hereby certify that the specifications lation are in Florida Ener PREPARED BY; DATE; I hereby certify that this building is in compliance with the Florida Energy Efficiency Code. '1/ Review of the plans and specifica- tions covered by this calculation indicates compliance with the Florida Energy Efficiency Code. Before construction is completed, this building will be inspected for compliance in accordance with Section 553.908, Florida Statutes. BUILDING OFFICIAL:~ DATE; OWNER/AGENT: DATE: I hereby certify(*) that the system design is in compliance with the Florida Energy Efficiency Code. SYSTEM DESIGNER REGISTRATION/STATE ARCHITECT : MECHANICAL: PLUMBING ELECTRICAL: LIGHTING (*) Signature is required where Florida law requires design to be performed by registered design professionals. Typed names and registration numbers may be used where all relevant information is contained on signed/sealed plans. ===========================================================~================ PROVISOS: 1. ZONE 1 IS FED FROM EXISTING 2 TON AIR HANDLER. 2. WINDOWS SHALL BE DOUBLE GLASED. 401.------GLAZING--ZONE Elevation Type BUILDING ENVELOPE SYSTEMS COMPLIANCE CHECK l------------------------------------.------______v_ U SC VLT Shading Area (Sqft) North South --------- --------------- -------------- ---------- Cormnercial Cormnercial 0.92 .82 .5 Continuous Ove 36 0.92 .82 .5 Continuous Ove 36 Total Glass Area in Zone 1 = 72 2-------------------------------------------_____v_ U SC VLT Shading Area (Sqft) 401.------GLAZING--ZONE Elevation Type North South --------- --------------- -------------- ---------- Cormnercial Cormnercial 402.------WALLS--ZONE Elevation Type 0.92 .82 .5 Continuous Ove 48 0.92 .82 .5 Continuous Ove 48 Total Glass Area in Zone 2 = 96 Total Glass Area = 168 1--------------------____________________________ U Insul R Gross (Sqft) --------- -------------------------------- ----- ------- ----------- North South West 8"BLOCK/INS/DRYWALL 8"BLOCK/INS/DRYWALL 8"BLOCK/INS/DRYWALL 402.------WALLS--ZONE Elevation Type .085 7 88 .085 7 88 .085 7 24 Total Wall Area in Zone 1 = 200 2------------------______________________________ U Insul R Gross (Sqft) --------- -------------------------------- ----- ------- ----------- North South East 8"BLOCK/INS/DRYWALL 8IJBLOCK/INS/DRYWALL 8"BLOCK/INS/DRYWALL 403.------DOORS--ZONE Elevation Type .085 7 384 .085 7 384 .085 7 288 Total Wall Area in Zone 2 = 1056 Total Gross Wall Area = 1256 1--------------__________________________________ U Area (Sqft) North South --------- ------------------------------------------ ----- ---------- No doors No doors 403.------DOORS--ZONE Elevation Type 0.00 0 0.00 0 Total Door Area in Zone 1 = 0 2----------------________________________________ U Area (Sqft) --------- ------------------------------------------ ----- ---------- North 1-3/4 Steel Door-Paper Honeycomb core 0.56 18 South 1-3/4 Steel Door-Paper Honeycomb core 0.56 18 Total Door Area in Zone 2 = 36 Total Door Area = 36 404.------ROOFS--ZONE 1---------------_________________________________ Type Color U Insul R Area (Sqft) ------------------------------------ ------ ----- ------- .---------- Shngl/l/2"WD Deck/WD Truss/91J B Medium 0.027 30 585 Total Roof Area in Zone 1 = 585 404.------ROOFS--ZONE 2---------------_______________________,__________ Type Color U Insul R Area (Sqft) ------------------------------------ ------ ----- ------- ~---------- Shngl/1/2"WD Deck/WD TrusS/9" B Medium 0.027 30 1728 Total Roof Area in Zone 2 = 1728 Total Roof Area = 2313 405.------FLOORS-ZONE 1------------____________________________________ Type Insul R Area (Sqft) ------------------------------------------------ -------"'l""-- Slab on Grade/Uninsulated ------------------------------------------------ o 585 Total Floor Area in Zone 1 = 585 2----------------________________________________ Insul R Area (Sqft) 405.------FLOORS-ZONE Type Slab on GradejUninsulated 0 1728 Total Floor Area in Zone 2 = 1728 Total Floor Area = 2313 406.------INFILTRATION----------_________________________________________ I CHECK Infiltration Criteria in 406.1.ABCD have been met. MECHANICAL SYSTEMS CHECK --------------------------------------------------------------'----/----- HVAC load sizing has been performed. (407.1.ABCD) 407.------COOLING SYSTEMS----------------_____________________.__________ Type No Efficiency IPLV Tons ---------------------------- ---------- ----- -------------- 1. Split System 2. Split System 408.------HEATING Type -------------------------------- 1 10 0 1.50 1 10 0 5.00 SYSTEMS---------------________________________________ No Efficiency BTUjhr 1. Electric Resistance 1 1 17050 2. Electric Resistance 1 1 51150 409.------VENTILATION-------____________________________________________ I CHECK Ventilation Criteria in 409.1.ABCD have been met. 410.-----AIR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM--------------__________________________ CHECK ----~~~~-~i;i~~-~~d-d~~i~~-~~~~-b~~~-~~~f;~~d~-(~~~~~~~~~)------I----- AHU Type Duct Location R-value ---------- -------------- ----------------------------------- ---------------------- ------- 1. Air Conditioners Without Insulated Ro 6 2. Air Conditioners Without Insulated Ro 6 CHECK ----~~~~i~~-~~d-b~l~~~i~~-~ili-b~-~~~f;~~d~-(~~~~~~~~~)---------1----- 411.-----PUMPS AND PIPING-ZONE _________________________________________ Basic prescriptive requirements in 411.1.ABCD have been met. I PLUMBING SYSTEMS 411.-----PUMPS AND PIPING-ZONE 1--------------_________________________ Type R-valuejin Diameter Thickness ------------------------ 1. Non-Circulating 411.-----PUMPS AND PIPING-ZONE Type ---------- -------- --------- ------------------------ 2--------------_________________________ R-valuejin Diameter Thickness 1. Non-Circulating 412.-----WATER HEATING SYSTEMS-ZONE 1-------------_____________________ Type Efficiency StandbyLoss InputRate Gallons ---------- -------- --------- ------------------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- 412.-----WATER HEATING SYSTEMS-ZONE 2---------------____________________ Type Efficiency StandbyLoss InputRate Gallons ------------------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------1 ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS 413.-----ELECTRICAL POWER DISTRIBUTION----------__________________ _____ Metering criteria in 413.1.ABCD have been met. 414.-----MOTORS--------___________________________________________ _____ Motor efficiencies in 414.1.ABCD have been met. 415.-----LIGHTING SYSTEMS-ZONE 1-------------_______________.___________ Space Type No Control Type 1 No Control Type 2 No Watts Area(Sqft) CHECK -------------- -------------- --- ------ ---------- Corridor lOn/Off 2 None 0 600 396 Total Watts for Zone 1 = 600 Total Area for Zone 1 = 396 2--------------_________________________ No Control Type 2 No Watts Area(Sqft} 415.-----LIGHTING SYSTEMS-ZONE Space Type No Control Type 1 Auditorium Inactive S lOn/Off 2 On/Off -------------- ------ ---------- 2 On/Off 6 2634 1528 2 None 0 172 200 Total Watts for Zone 2 = 2806 Total Area for Zone 2 = 1728 Total Watts = 3406 Total Area = 2124 CHECK Lighting criteria in 415.1.ABCD have been met. 16. Operation/maintenance manual will be provided to owner. (102.1) --------------------------------------------------------------.---- ----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. 5 . 6. ~~~~~~~~l~'IIIIIIII'III"'IIIIIIIIIII 11111111I1111 NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT State of - . i-/C'Jtl OIQ County of p(J~(' 0 THB tmnE~SXGNP~ hereby gives notice that improvement will be made to c~rtain real property, and in accordance with Chapter 713, Florida Statutes, the following infor~ation is provided in this Notice of Commencement: 1. , II I(~ --' 2. General Description of Improvement 1.1 rlr! tT, 'CI .U ~ IkJLV ~h, \ rJ /1>...;1 -I- / S 7' O! ~J -t 3. Owner Information: Name Rept: 551475 DS: 0.00 12/17/01 ri(:'$T (.",vir~o FfiJT(c(.IS:I~t C HLJ/1..C (t u J' J:}CTS Ree: 6.00 IT: 0. 00 Dpty Clerk l~ddress S"5i\l/6 l8''t-C; STEFl City -z -eft.., II {.,;If s State r-=-l- Interest in Property: L; U , I..yf. 1'- JED PITTMAN~ PASCO COUNTY CLERK 12/17/01 0~:4~m 1 of 913 OR BK 480'1 PG 10 Name of Fee Simple Titleholder: (If other th~n owner) Address City State Coo <?,..c, ~0097 Contractor: Name Rnbe 1... T Y Ill?-R./JJC 7 01....) , U Address 0l0' t../;;L P~AJAJl'..tf. e. ~( c.T City Dv If>iVt:J ':1- R State ~ Surety: Name fJ,Pt Address City State Amount of Bond: $ Lender: Name AlA Address City State 7. Persons within the State of Florida designated by Owner upon whcm notices or o~her documents may be served as provided by Section 713.13(1)(a)(7), Florida Statutes: R 8. tJC1me ReI/ L / ~ f F 0 A ..12.-. tJ... L.. 0 V,- u ~ r(. - ( '.A Address ,<,L/o 9 ct 5/Rc~ City 2~.aj~"Li h, (rlS In addition to himself, Owner designates V.II of to receive a copy of the Lienor's Notice as provided in Section 713.l3(1)(b), Florida Statutes. State "PI- 33SC(D 9. r:xp.i..rnti'm d"te or Not.lce of Commencement. (the expiration date is 1 yeCir fr~m the date of recording unless a different date is specified.) Signature of Owner: t1f1"'t"- ~ ~~ Sworn to and subscribed before me this Q ~rhL1 J14 day of ~4-""ber ~~OD / . Not.lry Public: ~~ My C:):ni,Li ssion Expires J:31d-.)() I PC93053048 ~G,~~ l~\';f.~:rt.~~ MARTHA~. TALBERT !.: AJ:.i MY COMMISSiIJN I CC 715736 \,;... ~} fXPI'1r- vch 2. 2002 ":( a. . .,' BCIP"". '. Ilndetwlll8l1 II._~ \:~- . -f G ' ~ 't' ,.... 1) , .' .~"/ ..(ItIJ 1 v . C'LGJ~t' -- ,1:.5''''''- -HI ~ /0 'J ;~ .;P "1' (j ~r .! b 'I - : 5 r..- r(J,v J 80.0 I-L 't $ :1V 1.01. J S9'LZ $ %~ C S~'L8L'Z $ %66 "". OS'V9L'Z $ : S. =' I 1. I - $1%<.' I - $ . %<.L6 - $ :SdIS I 8l:.St'6 $ lVJ.OJ.-ans I J - $1~31.3V11 NOIl:9'81~~1 I - $ :~3.L3V11 ~3l.VM - $ :'''.10.1 - $ :NOll. VE>I~~I - $ :~31.VM - $ :~3M3S 8Z"S1r6 $ '''.10.1 09'~Z $ :NOO~ OO.OL $ :'''=>'N''H=>3W - $ :9N'BWn'd S~'06 $ :'''=>,W,=>3'3 O~n:9L $ :.1'03H=> SS:n 9N'O"na - $ :.1'03H=> Og'89L $ :9N'O"nB - $ A VM3^I~O - $ SS3~OOV OO.60g $ l.33HS 33=' OO.OZ8'U ~ $ NOI1.Vnl'9'^ - $ :~3Hl.O OO'g~ $ :='OO~ ~30Nn V3~V ~3H1.0 OO'Zg $ 09~'Z :8NI^1l ~O NIVVII 3:>R:ld J.33:1 "OS 'IS Ifl8J. - OV8S If:unll:> ,BJs0:>>8JU8d paJ!un JSJ!=1 JO;J:JxeJJuo:> ,eJ8U89 "Jr uoJljufJJeA :J,J8qoH