My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
17-18046
Zephyrhills
>
Building Department
>
Permits
>
2017
>
17-18046
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2018 10:28:47 AM
Creation date
7/26/2018 1:35:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building Department
Company Name
VILLAGE WALK OF ZEPHYRHILLS
Building Department - Doc Type
Permit
Permit #
17-18046
Building Department - Name
VILLAGE WALK OF ZEPHYRHILLS LTD
Address
6012 VILLAGE WALK 6025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
489
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_ �� . <br /> Jacqueline Boges � � , � '���� <br /> , . __. � <br />' From: Rodney Corriveau _ , �; <br /> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2018 1:2�-I? <br /> To: Ashley Sweat; Kerrie N p�li�� �� <br /> Cc: Todd Vandeberg; Ross�Hayne��; Warren Romine; Paul Massengill; Jacqueline Boges <br /> Subject: RE: village walk - � ', <br />' Hi Ashley, ` <br /> Please see me comments in green. <br /> Thanks, Rod � <br /> From:Ashley Sweat<ashley.sweat@formulaconstruction.com> <br /> Sent:Wednesday, March 28, 2018 4:45 PM <br /> To: Rodney Corriveau <RCorriveau@ci.zephyrhills.fl.us>; Kerrie Napoli<kerrie.napoli@formulaconstruction.com> <br /> Cc:Todd Vandeberg<tvandeberg@ci.zephyrhills.fl.us>; Ross Haynes<ross.haynes@formulaconstruction.com>; Warren <br /> Romine<Warren.Romine@greyco.com>; Paul Massengill<paul.massengill@formulaconstruction.com> <br /> Subject: RE:village walk <br /> Good Afternoon Rodney, <br /> I would like to request clarification on a few of the items noted below.Any guidance you can provide would be greatly <br /> appreciated. <br /> 1) What very little landscaping that was actually planted had died. All dead landscaping shall be replaced and a <br /> ONE YEAR WARRANTY on the landscaping will be provided in order to ensure the plantings are well rooted.We <br /> can look at replacing the plants around the dumpster surrounds noted in the photos, however we typically do <br /> not provide a ONE YEAR WARRANTY for landscaping on properties which do not have irrigation systems as we <br /> have no control on how they are watered or maintained. Our landscaper does provide the attached with <br /> instructions on how often to water,etc. Is this an acceptable plan of action?Yes, remove all dead <br /> landscaping. Wait on direction of owner/management company for replanting and watering schedule to get <br /> thought the dry season. Sounds like maintenance will care for new plantings. <br /> 2) All landscaping that was to be provided around each of the a/c condenser units shall be installed and,as above, <br /> a ONE YEAR WARRANTY shall be provided by the contractor to ensure they are well rooted. I am a little unclear <br /> with this one. I believe what is intended to say is the existing plants around the condensers were not removed as <br /> per the approved drawings. I have attached the approved landscape plans which clearly state these are to be <br /> removed. Please clarify the request is to have these existing plantings around the condenser pads removed per <br /> the drawings?Yes, remove landscaping around condenser pads. <br /> 3) The parking spaces need to be repainted, as indicated on site plan.The spaces were re-striped per the drawings <br /> originally. We will review this and re-stripe any pavement markings with substantial fading. No clarification <br /> needed. OK <br /> 4) Some of the ADA accessible ramps are not painted properly.The photo documentation provided for this item <br /> appears to be for an existing RA ramp that is not located along a designated accessible path.The old HC striping <br /> has been whited out as to not confuse with an accessible parking space. I am unclear what action needs to be <br /> taken hear. Our understanding is that RD requested these existing RA ramps to remain in place. Please confirm if <br /> leaving this RA ramp in place is acceptable? If it is not to current ADA standards, it must be removed. <br /> � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.