My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
01-0500
Zephyrhills
>
Building Department
>
Permits
>
2001
>
01-0500
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2009 2:41:48 PM
Creation date
10/18/2006 10:38:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building Department
Building Department - Doc Type
Permit
Permit #
01-0500
Building Department - Name
RON'S CARWASH
Address
5542 GALL BV
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Oct 23 01 01:29p <br /> <br />Stuart Rogers <br /> <br />813-782-4978 <br /> <br />p.2 <br /> <br />Mr. Doug Oemson <br />October 23,2001 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />5. There is concern on the part of some in our office who happened to drop by during one <br />of the concrete pours that the concrete used in the poured channel and walls may have <br />had a high slump, possibly because of too much water in the mix. Again, cylinder tests <br />are important to ensure the quality of concrete used. <br /> <br />6. The steel sleeves through the pond walls are at angles to the pipes installed within them. <br /> <br />7. The plans call for Link Seals between the storm pipes and the sleeves through which <br />they run. None are installed. <br /> <br />8. As was previously mentioned, the blocks within curved sections of the pond walls are <br />stacked, not laced. The structural ramifications of this are not known. We recommend <br />evaluation by a structural engineer. <br /> <br />9. There is no way of knowing if adequate reinforcing was placed on the top course of the <br />retention pond retaining walls. As indicated in our last letter, during previous <br />observations it was noted that only one bar was placed on top of the wall as opposed to <br />two as called for by the plans. <br /> <br />10. During recent observations while driving by the site, it appeared that the curved section <br />of the retaining wall facing 7th Street leans toward the inside of the pond at the top. <br /> <br />11. The small radii of the pond are constructed with half-blocks. Extra reinforcing probably <br />should have been used in these areas. <br /> <br />12. There appears to be no vibrating equipment on the site for use in ensuring adequate <br />filling of the block cells. . <br /> <br />13. Reinforcing bars in the south wall of the building are not spaced in accordance with the <br />foundation plan drawings between window openings. <br /> <br />14. Reinforcing bars appear to be missing in the offset block wall for vending machines. <br /> <br />15. During a recent stop at the site we noted a large hole in the middle of the pad area for <br />the vending machines. We were told this was the tooter excavation. The footer should <br />be centered with respect to the proposed wall and reinforced in accordance with the <br />plans. <br /> <br />16. There are still washouts on the neighboring car wash site. All disturbed earth on the <br />neighboring side should be restored, compacted, shaped and sodded as soon as possible, <br />both for safety and aesthetic considerations. <br /> <br />17. We have noted various broken blocks within the walls, particularly the header course. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.