My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
02-1380
Zephyrhills
>
Building Department
>
Permits
>
2002
>
02-1380
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2009 2:54:46 PM
Creation date
11/16/2006 6:32:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building Department
Building Department - Doc Type
Permit
Permit #
02-1380
Building Department - Name
1ST BAPTIST CHURCH
Address
3830 5TH AV
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />J. HOSTER MOBILITY <br /> <br />3209 W. Woodlawn Ave. <br />Tampa, Florida 33607 <br />Phone/Fax (813) 637-8252 <br /> <br />4912 Sunset Blvd. <br />Port Richey, Florida 34668 <br />Phone/Fax (727) 848-7660 <br /> <br />Bill Burges <br />Building Inspector <br />City of Zephyrhills <br />5335 8th Street <br />Zephyrhills, FL 33542 <br /> <br />RE: Transportation Impact Fees for the First Baptist Church Ancillary Building <br /> <br />Dear Bill: <br /> <br />Pursuant to our telephone conversation regarding the transportation impact of the church's <br />ancillary building, the following information is provided. The ancillary building is only used for <br />Sunday School classes, with the first session having commenced the last Sunday in February. <br /> <br />Traffic counts at the entrances to the parking lot (which has not been enlarged) were not available <br />prior to the opening of the new building. Therefore, conducting traffic counts after the building <br />was in use would not provide meaningful evidence as to the possible additional traffic generation <br />associated with the new building. Sunday School attendance as a surrogate for traffic counts is a <br />reasonable assumption since other factors, such as auto occupancy and the proportion of Sunday <br />School attendees that stay for the church service, would remain constant and not be affected by <br />the construction of the new building. The church keeps detailed records of Sunday School <br />attendance; attached is a copy of that data from January 2000 through the third Sunday in March <br />2003. Also, attach is a graph showing average monthly attendance for the time period. The first <br />three Sundays in March provides the first period of normal operations after the grand opening <br />Sunday. While average weekly attendance was higher for 2003 than 2002 it is below the average <br />for the four year period. There appears to be no significant change in attendance since the new <br />building opened, which substantiates the assumption that traffic entering and exiting the area did <br />not increase as a result of the new building. <br /> <br />Since the purpose of impact fees is to help mitigate the impact of new development and that there <br />must be an nexus between the impacts created by the development and the fees that are charged, <br />imposing a transportation impact fee for a building that does not generate increased traffic does <br />not appear to be reasonable. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.