Laserfiche WebLink
April2l, 20i 1 <br /> 190 Ft Self-Supporting Tower Structural Ana/ysis A2G0082A Pasco County (VS) <br /> Project Number 110908, Revision 1 Page 4 <br /> Table 2- Design Antenna and Cable Information <br /> Mounting Center Line Quanity of Antenna Antenna Model Quantity Coax Coax <br /> Level (ft) Elevation (ft) Antennas Manufacturer Coax Size Location <br /> � 190 190 12 ; CSA PCSA 060-19 ( <br /> - - - - - - -- - - --- ---------- - -- <br /> i 175 � 175 ! 12 i CSA � PCSA 060-19 Unknown Unknown Unknown � <br /> - - - -- - <br /> � <br /> ; 155 - �-- - 1_55 - j 12 ; _CSA - --- - PCSA 060-19 --- <br /> - - - - ----- -- ------ - - ---- --- -.� <br /> 3) ANALYSIS PROCEDURE <br /> Table 3 - Documents Provided <br /> Document Remarks Reference Source <br /> Valmont dated November 13, 1998, <br /> Design Drawings - T-Mobile <br /> � Order Number iM337-01/MF40659 <br /> �- -- <br /> _ _ _ --- - - --------- ----------- --- --- - - - --- -___ <br /> LJ Nodarse & Associates, Inc dated December 15, 1996, <br /> �Geotechnical Report , - T-Mobile <br /> Project Number 96T-107J-9 � <br /> . - - - -------- -- ---- -- -- ---- - - - - -- - ---- - - <br /> SMGBI Report � SiteMaster dated October 28, 2007 � - �T-Mobilel <br /> Correspondence from T-Mobile with regards to the existing, � <br /> Correspondence - T-Mobile� <br /> proposed, and future loading, SAW dated April 14, 2011 ( <br /> 3.1) Analysis Method <br /> RISATower (version 5.4.2 0), a commercially available analysis software package, was used to create <br /> a three-dimensional model of the tower and calculate member stresses for various loading cases. <br /> Selected output from the analysis is included in Appendix A. <br /> 3.2) Assumptions <br /> 1) Tower and structures were built in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. <br /> 2) The tower and structures have been maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's <br /> specification. <br /> 3) The configuration of antennas, transmission cables, mounts and other appurtenances are as <br /> specified in Table 1 <br /> 4) TEP assumed the following material properties: <br /> a) Legs: ASTM A572 Gr. 50 <br /> b) Bracing• ASTM A36 <br /> c) Anchor Bolts: ASTM A354-BC <br /> 5) Serviceability with respect to antenna twist, tilt, roll, or lateral translation, is not checked and is <br /> left to the carrier or tower owner to ensure conformance. See Table 6. <br /> 6) This report is not a construction document. <br /> 4) ANALYSIS RESULTS <br /> Table 4- Component Stresses vs. Capacity <br /> Sectlon Elevation (it) Component Type Slze Crftical P �� b � F'P allow °� Pass / Fall <br /> No. Element (Ib) Capaclty <br /> T1 190 - 180 Leg PIPE 2.5 STD (SCH 40) 1 -8899.960 57361.699 15.5 Pass <br /> � T2 ( 180 - 160 Le PIPE 3.5 STD 20 43362.699 104062.000 41 7 Pass <br /> 1 - - � 9 ( r- -----f _ r � - r <br /> �- - - - � ---- - - - - -- - i I I - - - - <br /> T3 ( 160 - 140 � Leg ( Pipe 5 STD (SCH40) r 50 �-88242.000 f 169274 000 ( 52.1 ( Pass <br /> � � f - <br /> ' T4 140 - 120 I Leg i Pipe 5 STD (SCH40) � 74 f� 43050.000 f 169274 000 � 84.5 � Pass <br /> c <br /> , � , <br /> T5 � 120 - 100 Leg PIPE 8 STD (SCH40) � 9$ �� gg� 17_000 358212.000 55.6 � Pass � <br /> RISATower Report - version 5 4.2.0 <br />