Laserfiche WebLink
\ <br /> Guilarte Residence-Claim No.354110 <br /> HCE Report No. 100091.1 <br /> Page No. 6 <br /> Soil Sample Handling and Classification <br /> The soil samples obtained during the SPT borin s were placed in sealed containers to retain moisture and then <br /> returned to our laboratory. The samples were th n reviewed by our project engineer to confinn classifications, <br /> visually estimate the relative percentages of tl e soil's constituents (sand, clay, etc.), and identify pertinent <br /> structural feahires. The stratification lines s own on the boring records represent our interpretation of <br /> approximate boundaries between soil types. Th transition between strata may be gradual. Our classifications <br /> are based on a visual estimation of the soil prope ies and our engineering experience with the soils found in this <br /> geologic area. <br /> Floor Level Survey <br /> A floor level survey was conducted using a water evel manoineter. The manoineter used a tripod supported water <br /> reservoir connected to water filled clear tubing. The tubing tenninates along a graduated stadia,and the water <br /> level at the stadia is the same as the level at the eservoir. Consequently,the floor elevation at designated data <br /> points throughout the structure could be meas ed relative to the elevation of the manometer reservoir. The <br /> elevation from the data points were adjusted for different floor covering elevations, and then reduced to reflect <br /> the elevation relative to the lowest points. The enclosed porch and .garage were surveyed separately. <br /> Approximate lines of equal elevations were dra n to the nearest tenth of an inch and are shown on the results <br /> which are attached in�pendix D.Fi zrg �•e 4 of t iis report. <br /> LAB RATORY TESTS <br /> Laboratory tests are commonly perfonned on soi samples to inore definitively establish their physical properties. <br /> Laboratory tests often inchide;organic content, noisture content,percent material finer than No.200 sieve,and <br /> Atterberg limits. Eight samples were tested to d tennine fines and moisture content and to detennine the correct <br /> classification. These sainples consisted of shallo clayey soils. The results of these laboratory tests are presented <br /> below in the Results section. <br /> RESULTS <br /> Ground Penetratin�Radar <br /> After receipt of the GPR report,tliis author revie ed the GPR survey results,including the digital profile imagery, <br /> to review the findings. Upon coinpletion of th invasive testing,the GPR digital profiles were reviewed again <br /> with the findings of the borings to re-evahiate t e initial interpretations of the GPR profiles. <br /> The GPR survey was perfoi7ned on the interio and exterior of the structure and did not identify any a�parent <br /> geologic features of interest. For a more deta led discussion of the results of the GPR survey, the reader is <br /> referred to the Ground Penetrating Radar Repo in�vendix C. <br /> Borin s <br /> SPT Borings <br /> SPT boring B-1 was perfonned near the fi•ont ri ht corner of the residence near dainage observed to the structure. <br /> The boring encountered loose to dense fine san to clayey fine sand,with N-values ranging from 6 to 34 blows <br /> per foot,fi•om the ground surface to a depth of 8 feet and again from a depth of 48 to 53 feet. From a depth of <br /> 3 8 to 48 feet the boring encountered very loose t loose clayey fine sand with liinestone fraginents,with N-vahies <br /> of 2 and 5 blows per foot. Very stiff clay with imestone fraginents,with an N-value of 21 blows per foot,was <br /> encountered from a depth of 53 to 57 feet,und -lain by very hard lunestone,with an N-value of 50 blows for 6 <br />