My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
14-15557
Zephyrhills
>
Building Department
>
Permits
>
2014
>
14-15557
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2015 8:08:49 AM
Creation date
8/19/2015 8:08:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building Department
Building Department - Doc Type
Permit
Permit #
14-15557
Building Department - Name
GUILARTE,WILDER & MARIVEL
Address
39302 6TH AVE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Guilarte Residence-Claim No.354110 <br /> HCE Report No. 100091.1 <br /> Page No. 9 <br /> EVA UATION <br /> Definition of Sinkholes <br /> This exploration was perfoi-�ned with an einphasis o sinkhole development as a cause of ground subsidence. <br /> Sinkholes have typical characteristics which include ones of very soft or loose soil sediments that have washed <br /> downward into pre-existing cavern networks within t�ie bedrock. This very soft or loose soil zone is corrunonly <br /> called a raveling zone. The raveling zone originat s at the limestone surface as the overlying soils begin to <br /> collapse or inove vertically downward into the soluti n features within the liinestone. The loosening occurs in <br /> an upward vertical inotion until subsidence of the gr und surface occurs. The essential criteria for establishing <br /> the presence of sinkhole development as a probable ause of subsidence and structural damage include; <br /> • A cylindrical or cohimnar zone of very sof or loose soil that extends from the top of the limestone <br /> fonnation to the ground surface. <br /> • The presence of significant voids within the imestone. <br /> • A complete loss of drilling fluid circulation in the over-burden soils at significant distance above the <br /> liinestone fonnation. <br /> • A loss of soil density with increasing depth f penetration,generally observed for a distance of tens of <br /> feet. (the loss of soil density with increasing depth of penetration should be represented by a trend and <br /> not isolated individual samplings). <br /> • Stnicture dainage, a surface ground depre sion or other obvious observable indications of ground <br /> inovement inust be present in the immediate 1 cation. Generally when a structure is affected by sinkhole <br /> activity,the dainage is concentrated in speci ic areas and not widespread. <br /> The presence of one of the individual characteristic above does not establish reasonable evidence of damage <br /> caused by sinkhole. Damage caused by sinkholes m ist include multiple criteria from above. <br /> Site Specific Conclusions <br /> The results of our exploration and the SPT borings p rfonned at this site encountered conditions consistent with <br /> the definition of sinkholes as described in the criteria rovided in the previous section of this report. SPT borings <br /> B-3,and B-41ost complete drilling fluid circulation at ignificant depths(21 and 32 feet)above the hard limestone <br /> foi7nation,which can be an indication of downward ra eling ofthe overburden soils. SPT boring B-1 experienced <br /> a slight loss of density with depth froin a depth of 23 to 48 feet,with N-values generally decreasing froin 23 to <br /> 2 blows per foot. The floor level survey showed that small amount of subsidence inay have occurred at the right <br /> rear corner of the structure. <br /> Based on the results of this exploration,it is our pr fessional opinion that sinkhole activity can not be ruled <br /> out as a possible contributing factor to damag at this residence, within a reasonable professional <br /> probability. <br /> The cracks in the driveway and front porch tile,as we 1 as the hairline cracks in the terrazzo floor,are apparently <br /> the result of concrete shrinkage,which is common an occurs when concrete shrinks as it dries/cures. There are <br /> not adequate control joints in the driveway. Contro' joints are typically placed in concrete slabs to provide a <br /> location for shrinkage cracics to occur. Control jo nts should be spaced no fiirther than 8 feet apart in the <br /> horizontal and vertical directions of concrete slabs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.