Laserfiche WebLink
Beverly Jones <br /> From: A 1 inspectionsinc@verizon.net <br /> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11.45 AM <br /> To: Beverly Jones <br /> Subject: Re: Shingle Specks <br /> Beverly, as per the Historical Preservation Board <br /> meeting Feb. 02-16-11, I/ we have reviewed the C.A. application. The circumstances with this case <br /> are "less than desirable" as we have expedited our review in less than three days from the time we <br /> were first notified. For the record, the supporting documentation is incomplete, i.e. no shingle color, <br /> nor specific description was provided, i.e. three-tab, dimensional, five-tab, etc. and more importantly, <br /> the project was started / partially finished prior to obtaining a proper roofing permit. This creates <br /> issues with review and making an appropriate ruling as material evidence has been destroyed / <br /> disposed of. It also appears the property owner is not understanding of this process. Therefore, on a <br /> one time basis, I/ we will approve this application, but conditionally, "Under Protest". I will personally <br /> be submitting proposed changes to the review process which include significant fines to both the <br /> owners and contractors who fail to adhere to requirements for "historic contributing structures". <br /> Professionally , William Back H.P.B. "Vice Chairman" <br /> -----Original message----- <br /> From: Beverly Jones <bjones@ci.zephyrhills.fl.us> <br /> To: a 1 inspectionsinc@verizon.net <br /> Sent: Thu, Feb 17, 2011 21:08:16 GMT+00:00 <br /> Subject: FW: Shingle Specks <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Donotreply@ci.zephyrhills.fl.us <br /> [mailto: Donotreply@ci. zephyrhills. fl.us] <br /> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 4:49 PM <br /> To: Beverly Jones <br /> Subject: Shingle Specks <br /> i <br />