Laserfiche WebLink
ZEPHYRHILLS HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MINUTES <br /> A Historic Preservation Board Meeting was held on Wednesday, February 16, 2011, in <br /> the conference room at the Municipal Building. Chairman Geiger called the meeting to order <br /> 5:05 p.m. as a quorum was present. Roll call was taken. Present were members Bill Back, <br /> John Geiger, and Tracy Sullivan. Jason Aiken was unable to attend. <br /> New Business <br /> 1. Reauest for a Certificate of Ap�rooriateness submitted bv Thomas & Marsha Sauer for <br /> replacement of their roof at 5527 11 Street <br /> Chairman Geiger explained that they wish to install shingles to the roof at this location. <br /> There has not been very much information submitted as work had already begun when the roof <br /> contractor applied for the permit. The contractor explained to staff that he had not realized this <br /> was a historic house and because it had been leaking the owners were very anxious to get the <br /> work done. The contractor provided a piece of material (rolled on roofing brushed with tar) that <br /> he had removed from the roof. <br /> Vice Chair Back commented that just because he provides a sample it doesn't <br /> necessarily mean that it is accurate / original as this house is from 1928 and this sample doesn't <br /> mean that this product was what was originally on the house. Mr. Back explained his issue is <br /> that the H. P. Board is being asked to make a decision on here-say with very little supporting <br /> evidence. He stated that if the Board reviewed 500 cases a year then we would have a <br /> precedent but now there are so few cases this is the first time this issue has come up. If we <br /> approve one now there are so few that in six months from now if another case comes through <br /> we should handle it exactly the same way. He emphasized that if we let applicants slide on <br /> providing the supporting information, which we require in the first place, then where does it stop. <br /> Mr. Back said the contractor at minimum could take a picture up in the attic showing the boards <br /> of the roof, if they are basically touching each other then evidence would support, yes there was <br /> probably some other type of roofing, besides 5-V metal, etc. But simply because of the board <br /> spacing, to automatically say the H. P. Board finds that is what belongs on the house, he would <br /> rather have an opinion from someone that is an expert on that vernacular who would say it <br /> could be one of these 3 or 4 things. He feels that the supporting information the contractor has <br /> provided is incomplete. Mr. Back said if we let this one case go through under these <br /> circumstances, he is afraid it could snow ball and we will face this again and again. Mr. Back <br /> stated that during inspections he can look from the attic underneath and determine the nailing <br /> pattern that holds the decking boards / plywood. One or two pictures that shows what kind of <br /> boards support the roof and how far apart they are (decking) should be submitted with the <br /> application. Along with the pictures, the contractor should submit a sample, a product <br /> reference, a MSDS sheet or something that says what the product is made of and what it looks <br /> like, i.e. three-tab shingles, dimensional shingles, etc. <br /> After further discussion, Tracy moved to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness with <br /> the conditions that supporting documents indicating the proposed type of roof to be installed and <br /> photos showing the size and spacing of the boards be presented to be reviewed by the Board. <br /> Motion was seconded by Bill Back. Motion passed unanimously. <br /> Meeting was adjourned at 5:30 p.m. <br />