My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
14-15183 (2)
Zephyrhills
>
Building Department
>
Permits
>
2014
>
14-15183 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2015 8:14:36 AM
Creation date
3/17/2015 8:14:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building Department
Company Name
ZEPHYR COMMONS
Building Department - Doc Type
Permit
Permit #
14-15183
Building Department - Name
SF ZEPHYR COMMONS LP
Address
7880 GALL BLVD REVISION
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dale, I am ok with the sign being altered to address the issues identified below and that they will still confirm with the <br /> sign standards as originally approved. If you would like to discuss further plead let me know and I will copy the Building <br /> Department on this issue. <br /> Thanks, <br /> j �, � <br /> �:,�.. <br /> � `gwaun�k�. <br /> �odd.�-f: `Vande Berg <br /> Director of Planning <br /> Planning Department <br /> City of Zephyrhills <br /> 5335 8th Street <br /> Zephyrhills, FL 33542 � <br /> Phone: 813.780.0006 <br /> Fax: 813.780.0005 <br /> vandeber�@ci.zephvrhills.fl.us <br /> "It's not the P/an that's important.... it's the Planning" <br /> From: Dale Johnson [mailto:DaleJohnsonCa�mail.primericagroupone.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, ]une 03, 2014 4:21 PM <br /> To: Todd Vandeberg <br /> Subject: FW: Zephyr Commons Signage - Mattress Firm <br /> Todd: <br /> Following our last conversation regarding the Mattress Firm sign visibility issue, I visited the site and was very surprised <br /> to see that the sign is literally in the hole. It is totally obscured by the buffer and topography. We are having leasing <br /> issues as a result of the visibility concerns. As a result of my site visit, I reviewed the development plans/signage plans <br /> and realized the signage did change in its type description, but the design height was not amended to accommodate a <br /> combined monument sign/multi-tenant sign. I copied you on my e-mail, which is below for your review. After talking <br /> with a landscape architect about redesigning the buffer, we agreed that would not solve the visibility issue. A majority <br /> of the tenant panels are below the retaining wall and will never be visible. <br /> I contacted the sign company to get a quote to raise the sign 5 feet so the height would conform to combined tenant <br /> monument sign height requirement of 16 feet. This will be an expensive renovation to the sign, but finally having some <br /> out parcel activity is important synergy. <br /> Please let me know your thoughts and let me know how best to proceed. <br /> Regards, <br /> Dale W.Johnson <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.